vg|52nd EBTC-BBO3,OPEN-RR14,I,17,32,DENMARK,0,NETHERLANDS,0| rs|2SW-1,3CN-3,3NE+1,3NE=,3NE+1,3NE+1,1NW=,1NW+1,7HE=,7SE=,2CS+1,1NE-1,4SS=,3HN-4,4CE-1,4SE=,4SS+1,3CEx-5,3NN+2,6DN=,3SW-4,3HN-3,5DN-2,5HEx-3,3NN+2,4SN+1,1NN+2,1NN+2,4SE=,4SW=,5SW-1,6HSx-3| pn|M BILDE,DE WIJS,D BILDE,B MULLER,VERHEES Jr,ASKGAARD,VAN PROOIJ,KONOW|pg|| qx|o17|st||md|3SK84HAK93DJ942CK6,SAQ9652H7DAT3C975,SJT7H82DK86CAJT83,S3HQJT654DQ75CQ42|sv|o|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|2S!|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sJ|pc|s3|pc|s4|pc|sQ|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s7|pc|h4|pc|s8|pg|| pc|s9|pc|sT|pc|h5|pc|sK|pg|| pc|d2|pc|d3|pc|dK|pc|d5|pg|| pc|d8|pc|d7|pc|d4|pc|dA|pg|| pc|h7|pc|h2|pc|hQ|pc|hK|pg|| pc|d9|pc|dT|pc|d6|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|hA|pc|s5|pc|h8|pg|| pc|c7|pc|cJ|nt|pelu: wellcome to the topmatch in Gr B : No 1 (NL) against No 3 (Denmark)|pg|| pc|c2|pc|c6|pg|| pc|c3|pc|c4|pc|cK|pc|c5|pg|| pc|dJ|pc|s2|pc|c8|pc|h6|pg|| pc|c9|pc|cA|pc|cQ|pc|h3|pg|| pc|cT|pc|hT|pc|h9|pc|s6|pg|| pg|| qx|c17|st||md|3SK84HAK93DJ942CK6,SAQ9652H7DAT3C975,SJT7H82DK86CAJT83,S3HQJT654DQ75CQ42|sv|o|mb|p|nt|vugraphzdc: welcome everybody!|pg|| mb|2D!|mb|d|nt|ahollan1: both pairs playing a Strong 1@C|pg|| nt|ahollan1: and that about ends the comparison|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 2@D = (5)6+@H/@S, 2-9 hcp|pg|| mb|r|nt|ahollan1: DBL = a) 13-16, BAL b) 15+, takeout c) 19+ d) strong, forcing|pg|| mb|3C|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: RDBL forces 2@H to play own suit|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|pc|s3|pc|s4|pc|sQ|pc|s7|pg|| pc|sA|pc|sJ|pc|h4|pc|s8|pg|| pc|s2|pc|sT|pc|c2|pc|sK|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d2|pc|dA|pc|d6|pg|| pc|h7|pc|h2|pc|hT|pc|hA|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c5|pc|c3|pc|c4|pg|| pc|c6|pc|c7|pc|cJ|pc|cQ|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|hK|pc|c9|pc|h8|pg|| nt|ahollan1: kaboom|pg|| pc|s9|mc|6|pg|| qx|o18|st||md|4S87652H94DJTCQJT6,SJHAQT7DKQ654C853,SK93HK862DA87C974,SAQT4HJ53D932CAK2|sv|n|mb|1N!|an|12-15|mb|p|mb|2C|mb|p|nt|pelu: NS play a naturel system with 5 card major 4 card D and strong NT|pg|| mb|2S|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|pelu: sorry total wrong DK no 4 and NL no 7 - sorry|pg|| pc|cQ|nt|pelu: EW play Tarzan precision - and I hope for help fron dutch kibs to explain:)|pg|| nt|pelu: NL and Denmark are No 1 and 3 in Women :):)|pg|| nt|pelu: I had exp to see that match on BBO|pg|| pc|c3|pc|c9|pc|c2|pg|| pc|cT|pc|c5|pc|c7|pc|cK|pg|| pc|h3|pc|h4|pc|hQ|pc|hK|pg|| nt|pelu: oh I see c- fine :) that is also very complex|pg|| pc|sK|pc|sA|pc|s8|pc|sJ|pg|| pc|d2|pc|dT|pc|dK|pc|d7|pg|| pc|h7|pc|h2|pc|hJ|pc|h9|pg|| pc|d3|pc|dJ|pc|dQ|pc|dA|pg|| pc|h6|pc|h5|pc|s2|pc|hT|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h8|pc|s4|pc|s5|pg|| mc|10|pg|| qx|c18|st||md|4S87652H94DJTCQJT6,SJHAQT7DKQ654C853,SK93HK862DA87C974,SAQT4HJ53D932CAK2|sv|n|nt|ahollan1: we started this match with Denmark 4th Netherlands 7th|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 3 matches tomorrow to determine which 9 teams advance|pg|| mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2C|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: both pairs 1N=14-16|pg|| mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|cQ|nt|ahollan1: NS carding udca, odd/even, smith|pg|| nt|Aurora: Hello all, welcome to a new session – Round 14|pg|| nt|Aurora: Live video from this table here on Channel 4: http://livebridge.net/youtube/|pg|| pc|c3|nt|Aurora: Here you can see the players and their CC: http://livebridge.net/bbo/wbf/match.php?eventid=1024&sessionid=18&matchid=BBO-2|pg|| pc|c9|nt|ahollan1: EW carding udca, reverse smith|pg|| pc|c2|pg|| nt|Aurora: Running scores here Open group A: http://www.eurobridge.org/repository/competitions/14Opatija/microsite/RunningScores/Asp/RoundTeamsConditStatClassicMod.asp?qtournid=1023&qshowflag=1|pg|| pc|h4|pc|h7|pc|hK|pc|h3|pg|| pc|h2|pc|hJ|pc|h9|pc|hT|pg|| pc|d2|pc|dT|pc|dK|pc|d7|pg|| pc|sJ|pc|s9|pc|s4|pc|s6|pg|| pc|c5|pc|c4|pc|cK|pc|c6|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s2|pc|d4|pc|s3|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|s5|pc|d5|pc|sK|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|o19|st||md|1SQJ75HJ842D6CAQJ9,ST86HAQ75DQ32C854,SK432HT6DT74CK763,SA9HK93DAKJ985CT2|sv|e|mb|1C|an|2+|mb|p|mb|1S|mb|2D|mb|2S|mb|3D|nt|rhelle: not an easy 3NT to reach now|pg|| mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|rhelle: East found courage!|pg|| pc|sQ|nt|pelu: well bid by E with the actual layout @cs 4-4 and fine @hs in dummy|pg|| pc|s6|pc|s2|pc|sA|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d6|pc|d2|pc|d4|pg|| pc|h3|pc|h2|pc|hA|pc|h6|pg|| pc|dQ|pc|d7|pc|d5|pc|s5|pg|| pc|d3|pc|dT|pc|dK|nt|pelu: running scores: http://www.eurobridge.org/repository/competitions/14Opatija/microsite/results.htm|pg|| nt|pelu: 4@s a perfect save over 3NT|pg|| pc|h4|pg|| pc|dJ|pc|c9|pc|c4|pc|c3|pg|| pc|d9|pc|cQ|pc|c5|pc|hT|pg|| pc|d8|pc|sJ|pc|c8|pc|c6|pg|| mc|11|pg|| qx|c19|st||md|1SQJ75HJ842D6CAQJ9,ST86HAQ75DQ32C854,SK432HT6DT74CK763,SA9HK93DAKJ985CT2|sv|e|mb|1D!|mb|p|mb|1S|nt|ahollan1: 1@D = 10-15 hcp, 0+@D MANY hand types|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 1@S usually less than game force|pg|| mb|1N|mb|2S|mb|d|nt|ahollan1: 2@S can be 4 or 5@S 1@D can be 4+@D 5+@S [canape]|pg|| mb|p|mb|3D|mb|3S|nt|ahollan1: now the only hand that verhees can't have is 4@S weak NT|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 4@S(441) and 4@D 5@S still possible|pg|| mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphzdc: claim?|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|s6|pc|s2|nt|ahollan1: great job by EW to find 3N|pg|| pc|sA|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d6|pc|d2|pc|dT|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: although they started with 1 NT, not very descriptive imo|pg|| mc|10|nt|ahollan1: other room also got there after 2@D overcall and west raise|pg|| pg|| qx|o20|st||md|2SQ73HKJ7DT9653CA6,SJT2H653DA2CKT942,SK654HQT4DK874CJ5,SA98HA982DQJCQ873|sv|b|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D!|an|2+|mb|p|nt|pelu: but also missed in CR|pg|| mb|1N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|s5|pc|s8|pc|sQ|pc|s2|pg|| pc|s7|pc|sT|pc|s4|pc|s9|pg|| pc|c4|pc|c5|pc|cQ|pc|cA|pg|| nt|pelu: why not play @d with that dummy?|pg|| pc|s3|pc|sJ|pc|sK|pc|sA|pg|| pc|c3|pc|c6|pc|c9|pc|cJ|pg|| pc|s6|pc|h2|pc|d9|pc|h3|pg|| pc|h4|pc|hA|pc|h7|pc|h5|pg|| pc|c7|pc|d6|pc|cK|pc|d4|pg|| pc|cT|pc|d7|pc|c8|pc|d3|pg|| pc|c2|pc|hQ|pc|h8|pc|d5|pg|| pc|h6|pc|hT|pc|h9|pc|hJ|pg|| pc|hK|pc|d2|pc|d8|pc|dJ|pg|| pc|dT|pc|dA|pc|dK|pc|dQ|pg|| pg|| qx|c20|st||md|2SQ73HKJ7DT9653CA6,SJT2H653DA2CKT942,SK654HQT4DK874CJ5,SA98HA982DQJCQ873|sv|b|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D!|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: 1@D = 2+@D, 10-15, maybe longer @C if BAL, 11-13|pg|| mb|p|pc|s4|nt|ahollan1: lead is 4th|pg|| pc|s8|pc|sQ|pc|sT|pg|| pc|s7|pc|sJ|pc|s6|pc|s9|pg|| pc|cT|pc|c5|pc|cQ|pc|cA|pg|| nt|ahollan1: did @S10 make it easier or harder for verhees?|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s2|pc|s5|pc|sA|pg|| pc|c8|pc|c6|nt|ahollan1: seems just an issue of overtricks|pg|| pc|cK|pc|cJ|pg|| pc|c9|nt|ahollan1: assuming Askgaard guesses @C|pg|| mc|8|nt|vugraphzdc: claimed asking about @D finesse|pg|| pg|| qx|o21|st||md|3SJT9HT7DQ42CKJT95,SA5HKJ5DAKJ75CA63,S87H862DT963CQ872,SKQ6432HAQ943D8C4|sv|n|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|1S!|an|gameforcing|mb|p|mb|1N!|mb|p|mb|2C!|an|asking|nt|pelu: 1@h opening can have 5+ @s :)|pg|| mb|p|mb|2S|an|5+!H5+!S|mb|p|mb|2N!|an|asking|mb|p|mb|3D!|an|6511/5611|nt|pelu: 1@s = relay - and then I give up :)|pg|| mb|p|mb|3H!|an|asking|mb|p|nt|pelu: we can see the 7 NT is a make (and /@h/@s)|pg|| mb|4C!|an|6511|mb|p|nt|pelu: 2@s = 5-5, 2Nt asking - 3@d same lengh in minor - so 6-5|pg|| mb|4D!|an|asking|mb|p|nt|pelu: so now he know distribution and can start asking for keycards|pg|| mb|5D!|mb|p|nt|pelu: both major Qs are importens - but could make 7@h even missing @sQ|pg|| nt|pelu: playing this system I would need a tablet in my backpocket :)|pg|| nt|pelu: or in front of me on the table :)|pg|| mb|7H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|pelu: if @ss 4-1 declarer need singleton on the hand with only 2@hs|pg|| pc|d2|mc|13|pg|| qx|c21|st||md|3SJT9HT7DQ42CKJT95,SA5HKJ5DAKJ75CA63,S87H862DT963CQ872,SKQ6432HAQ943D8C4|sv|n|mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: 1@S limited by failure to open 1@CC|pg|| mb|1N|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: 1N = game force relay|pg|| mb|2C!|nt|ahollan1: 2@C = 14-15 HCP, not 5M 5m|pg|| mb|p|mb|2D!|mb|p|mb|3N!|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: 2@D asks more info 3N = 6@S 5@H|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 4@C asks for exact shape that can be followed by keycard ask or maybe 4N keycard ask immediately|pg|| mb|4D!|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: not sure about 4@D :( maybe force 4@H|pg|| mb|4N|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: oh maybe 4@D-4@H-4N = keycard for @H 3N-4N = keycard for @S|pg|| mb|5S|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: @HQ is huge card|pg|| nt|ahollan1: probably easier to place that card in opener's hand after discoverig 6511|pg|| nt|ahollan1: a few telling me 4@D = @S also saying 4@C=@H but i thought 4@C asks exact shape|pg|| mb|7S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sT|pc|sA|pc|s7|pc|s2|pg|| pc|s5|pc|s8|pc|sK|pc|s9|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 7N may be slightly safer contract i think it makes some times when @S4-1|pg|| mc|13|nt|ahollan1: but as cards dealt 7@H/@S/NT all making|pg|| pg|| qx|o22|st||md|4STH43DT9742CAT532,SAQ62HQ875DA53C76,SKJ75HT962DKQCKQJ,S9843HAKJDJ86C984|sv|e|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D!|an|2+|mb|d|nt|pelu: non v 1@d promise 4+, but vuln only 2+|pg|| mb|1N|mb|2C!|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|pelu: ´8-9 trick in 2@c and 1NT down 1 on 5x@c and !§s from S|pg|| pc|d3|pc|dK|pc|d6|pc|d4|pg|| pc|dQ|pc|d8|pc|d7|pc|dA|pg|| nt|pelu: Askgaard - Konow in 7@s after 6 round af bidding - 7@h a little better|pg|| pc|h7|pc|h2|pc|hA|pc|h3|pg|| pc|hK|pc|h4|pc|h5|pc|h6|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|c2|pc|h8|pc|h9|pg|| pc|sT|pc|sA|pc|s5|pc|s3|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|hT|pc|c9|pc|cT|pg|| pc|d2|pc|d5|pc|cJ|pc|dJ|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c4|pc|c3|pc|c6|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|c8|pc|c5|pc|c7|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|c22|st||md|4STH43DT9742CAT532,SAQ62HQ875DA53C76,SKJ75HT962DKQCKQJ,S9843HAKJDJ86C984|sv|e|mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: nebulous @D|pg|| mb|1D|mb|d|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|c3|pc|c6|pc|cJ|pc|c4|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c8|pc|c2|pc|c7|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|c9|pc|cA|pc|s2|pg|| pc|c5|pc|d3|pc|s5|pc|s3|pg|| pc|cT|nt|vugraphzdc: declarer asking about carding methods|pg|| pc|s6|nt|ahollan1: did i get them right? @S5 = odd = likes @S|pg|| pc|h2|pc|s4|pg|| pc|sT|nt|ahollan1: 7@S hand pushed 7@H in other room|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|sK|pc|s8|pg|| pc|dQ|pc|d6|pc|d2|pc|dA|pg|| pc|h5|pc|h9|pc|hA|pc|h3|pg|| pc|s9|pc|d4|pc|sA|pc|s7|pg|| pc|h7|pc|h6|pc|hK|pc|h4|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|d7|mc|6|pg|| qx|o23|st||md|1SKT9863HDQ8643CJ7,S7542H9DTCAQT8642,SQHAJ86543DKJ2CK9,SAJHKQT72DA975C53|sv|b|mb|3S|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|h9|nt|jesperdall: Hi|pg|| nt|pelu: wrong singleton to lead :)|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h2|nt|pelu: @d lead easy down now EW has to fight|pg|| pc|c7|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s2|pg|| pc|hK|pc|s8|pc|c6|pc|h3|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s4|pc|h4|pc|sJ|pg|| pc|sT|pc|s5|pc|h5|nt|pelu: sh make now - E can hold up @dA but @cK entry yo finess @d9|pg|| pc|h7|pg|| pc|s9|pc|s7|pc|h6|nt|jesperdall: This will be quite a swing as NS went down FOUR in 3@h at the other table!|pg|| nt|jesperdall: Would you have opened as South, Peter?|pg|| nt|jesperdall: 3@s?|pg|| pc|c3|pg|| pc|d4|pc|dT|pc|dK|nt|pelu: S has only 1 @c left - but West endplayed to give him entry on @cK - stepping stone :)|pg|| pc|d5|pg|| pc|dJ|pc|dA|pc|d3|pc|c8|pg|| nt|pelu: No I dont think so, Jesper|pg|| nt|pelu: a stepping stone endplay is not what u see every day :)|pg|| nt|jesperdall: I would - and surely have received a diamond lead ;)|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|s6|pc|c2|pc|h8|pg|| pc|cJ|pc|cA|pc|c9|pc|c5|pg|| nt|jesperdall: Fascinating, indeed|pg|| pc|c4|pc|cK|mc|10|nt|pelu: a board for my bridge collum - and for many other newspapers :)|pg|| pg|| qx|c23|st||md|1SKT9863HDQ8643CJ7,S7542H9DTCAQT8642,SQHAJ86543DKJ2CK9,SAJHKQT72DA975C53|sv|b|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|3H|nt|ahollan1: 2@S = the ONLY natural weak 2 for NS|pg|| mb|p|nt|ahollan1: 3@H = natural INV|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: multiple decades ago i read a science fiction book that introduce me to the word schlimmbesserung|pg|| nt|ahollan1: which roughly translates to an improvement that makes matters worse|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: it's a german one :)|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 3@H is a good example|pg|| pc|sA|nt|ahollan1: absolutely german i knew from 3 years of high school|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s2|pc|sQ|pg|| nt|ahollan1: i just liked the oncept|pg|| nt|ahollan1: concept|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d3|pc|dT|pc|d2|pg|| pc|d5|pc|dQ|pc|h9|pc|dJ|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c9|pc|c3|pc|c7|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|cK|pc|c5|pc|cJ|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h2|pc|d4|pc|cT|pg|| pc|dK|pc|d7|pc|d6|pc|c2|pg|| pc|h3|pc|h7|pc|s8|pc|c4|pg|| nt|ahollan1: bilde father opened 3@S bilde so raised to 4|pg|| mc|5|pg|| qx|o24|st||md|2SA6HT986542D54C94,SJT3HQJDAT3CQJ763,S9875HA73DJ876CA2,SKQ42HKDKQ92CKT85|sv|o|mb|p|nt|jesperdall: If anything, this board shows that crazy things can happen when you apply pressure in the bidding|pg|| mb|p|mb|1C!|mb|2H|mb|d!|nt|jesperdall: Now Peter, would u have bid 2@h here as South? ;)|pg|| mb|3H|mb|d|mb|p|nt|pelu: against a strong @c YES - for me 2@H = 6+ @h or 5-4 in black|pg|| mb|4C|nt|jesperdall: Peter, you naughty boy|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|pelu: 3@h down 1 - and NS has 3 Aces against a minor game|pg|| pc|hT|nt|pelu: so perfect stop by EW|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|hA|pc|hK|pg|| nt|jesperdall: Always impressive to stop in four of a minor - particularly when it's right|pg|| nt|pelu: @s to A and @s = down 1|pg|| pc|s8|pc|s4|pc|sA|pc|s3|pg|| pc|s6|pc|sT|pc|s5|pc|sQ|pg|| pc|c5|pc|c4|pc|cQ|pc|cA|pg|| pc|s7|pc|s2|pc|c9|pc|sJ|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|c24|st||md|2SA6HT986542D54C94,SJT3HQJDAT3CQJ763,S9875HA73DJ876CA2,SKQ42HKDKQ92CKT85|sv|o|mb|1D!|nt|ahollan1: yet another precision 1@D of the yuk variety|pg|| mb|p|mb|1S|mb|3H|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|d|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|nt|vugraphzdc: K&R (JT3 QJ AT3 QJ763) = 8.55 |pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: wow i thought it was MY job to run KnR :)|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: (because I doubted wests hand evaluation)|pg|| nt|ahollan1: http://www.jeff-goldsmith.org/cgi-bin/knr.cgi|pg|| pc|hT|nt|ahollan1: not me -- i knew it was awful hand :)|pg|| pc|hJ|pc|hA|pc|hK|pg|| nt|ahollan1: KnR REALLY hates quacks [queens & jacks] and honors in short suits|pg|| nt|ahollan1: can't imagine any endplay that can gain a trick for declarer|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c5|pc|c4|pc|c3|pg|| pc|c2|pc|cT|pc|c9|pc|c6|pg|| pc|s2|pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s5|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: south changed from @S A to 6, but Ace was already seen at the table|pg|| mc|10|pg|| qx|o25|st||md|3SQ2HAQ9DKT65CKQT9,SJ73HT862DQ932C72,SKT9865HJ74DAJ4C8,SA4HK53D87CAJ6543|sv|e|mb|p|mb|2C!|mb|2N|nt|pelu: danish kib: lets stop the match now :)|pg|| mb|p|nt|pelu: 29 IMP = 16.5-3.5|pg|| mb|3H!|nt|jesperdall: The Danes did a splendid job to bid and make 4@s at the other table on 24|pg|| mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|c7|pc|c8|nt|pelu: but no hard defense against 4@s - to Ace and now @cA and @c - and both defenders were looking for the @c-ruff :)|pg|| pc|cA|pc|cT|pg|| nt|jesperdall: ;)|pg|| pc|h5|nt|bebechira: Peter Lund http://livebridge.net/bbo/wbf/player.php?wbf=191|pg|| nt|bebechira: Jesper Dall http://livebridge.net/bbo/wbf/player.php?wbf=5658|pg|| nt|pelu: if he take @hA and try to take 2@c tricks he will later have to find @dQ|pg|| nt|jesperdall: Great link, thanks - where did they get that picture from? 1996? ;)|pg|| pc|h9|pc|hT|pc|hJ|pg|| pc|s5|pc|s4|pc|sQ|pc|s3|pg|| pc|s2|pc|s7|pc|sT|pc|sA|pg|| nt|pelu: wd|pg|| mc|11|pg|| qx|c25|st||md|3SQ2HAQ9DKT65CKQT9,SJ73HT862DQ932C72,SKT9865HJ74DAJ4C8,SA4HK53D87CAJ6543|sv|e|mb|2S|mb|3C|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sQ|nt|ahollan1: even with better spots in trump suit -- konow would be in trouble with the overcall|pg|| nt|ahollan1: but he won't be the only one to make that bid|pg|| pc|s3|pc|s5|nt|ahollan1: Great Shuffler having a good laugh|pg|| pc|s4|pg|| pc|s2|pc|s7|pc|s6|pc|sA|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c9|pc|c2|pc|c8|pg|| pc|c4|nt|ahollan1: @S5 encouraging @S6 suit pref for @D|pg|| pc|cT|pc|c7|pc|s8|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: making 3 - on NS|pg|| pc|cK|pc|sJ|pc|s9|pc|c3|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|h2|pc|sT|pc|c5|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d2|pc|dJ|pc|d7|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d8|pc|d6|pc|d3|pg|| pc|sK|pc|c6|pc|dT|pc|d9|pg|| pc|h3|pc|h9|pc|hT|pc|hJ|pg|| mc|4|nt|Aurora: Live video from this table here on Channel 6: http://livebridge.net/youtube/|pg|| nt|Aurora: Running scores for this table - Open group B: http://www.eurobridge.org/repository/competitions/14Opatija/microsite/RunningScores/Asp/RoundTeamsConditStatClassicMod.asp?qtournid=1024&qshowflag=1|pg|| nt|ahollan1: in college we called -1400 "going for avogadro"|pg|| pg|| qx|o26|st||md|4SA4HDAQJ8754CAT72,ST732HJTDK93CKJ53,SKQ9HKQ9753DTCQ84,SJ865HA8642D62C96|sv|b|mb|p|nt|Aurora: Live video from this table here on Channel 5: http://livebridge.net/youtube/|pg|| nt|pelu: 2 x Bilde is the ancher pair on the danish team - they have played the first 14 matches|pg|| mb|1D|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|nt|Aurora: Running scores for this table - Open group B: http://www.eurobridge.org/repository/competitions/14Opatija/microsite/RunningScores/Asp/RoundTeamsConditStatClassicMod.asp?qtournid=1024&qshowflag=1|pg|| mb|3D!|an|less than 3card !H|mb|p|nt|jesperdall: I am not sure, but 3@d may deny 3@h support|pg|| nt|pelu: prob 3Nt by N now|pg|| mb|3N|nt|pelu: but if N bid 3@h then 3NT in S|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|s5|nt|pelu: how to play on @s-lead?|pg|| nt|jesperdall: Well, Holland struck back - we missed an adventure on 24, -1400 for the Danes in CR|pg|| nt|jesperdall: Sporting|pg|| nt|pelu: @sA and @d from top?|pg|| nt|jesperdall: sorry, board 25|pg|| pc|s4|nt|jesperdall: No, win in hand, run the 10 of @d|pg|| pc|sT|nt|pelu: the dutch use penalty D - not good for the danish EW in B 25|pg|| pc|sK|pg|| pc|dT|pc|d2|pc|d4|nt|jesperdall: I thought penalty doubles went out of fashion long ago|pg|| pc|dK|pg|| nt|pelu: spec after 2@s - 3@c D - for 90% = take out|pg|| nt|jesperdall: Here, even if De Wijs ducks, Dennis Bilde is home safe against diamonds 4-1|pg|| pc|hT|pc|hQ|pc|hA|pc|c2|pg|| nt|pelu: bvut when u bid obn a @c-suit as bad as AJ6 5 4 3 on 3-level u risk that (-1400) vuln against non vuln :)|pg|| pc|h6|mc|11|nt|jesperdall: I have seen strong players bid 2@h on 10xxxxxx recently...vulnerable|pg|| pg|| qx|c26|st||md|4SA4HDAQJ8754CAT72,ST732HJTDK93CKJ53,SKQ9HKQ9753DTCQ84,SJ865HA8642D62C96|sv|b|mb|p|mb|1C!|mb|p|mb|1N!|nt|ahollan1: 1@C = 16+ unbal 17+ bal|pg|| mb|p|nt|vugraphzdc: you had bridge in your college? lucky you|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 1N = 12-14, unbal [and some restrictions]|pg|| mb|2C|nt|ahollan1: well not so lucky if you look at my grades away from the bridge table|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: at mine, there's only witchcraft saga etc|pg|| mb|p|mb|2D|nt|ahollan1: 2@D = natural breaks the relays|pg|| mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|2N|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: oh that's better 2@C = RELAY|pg|| mb|3H|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: 3@H = exactly 3613|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: easy bidding, they use every bid that's available|pg|| nt|ahollan1: the goal is to have EW run out of PASS cards|pg|| mb|4D|nt|vugraphzdc: they re well equipped|pg|| mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: i should clarify in college bridge was NOT part of the curriculum it was my set of duplicate boards and a dedicated group of players cutting class and staying awake to the ...|pg|| nt|ahollan1: wee small hours|pg|| mb|6D|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|hA|pc|d4|pc|hT|pc|h3|pg|| pc|d5|nt|ahollan1: i think 4@D was natural slam try 4@S rejection|pg|| nt|ahollan1: @HA very good lead for declarer|pg|| pc|dK|pc|dT|pc|d2|pg|| nt|ahollan1: i've been corrected the ONLY lead for declarer|pg|| mc|12|nt|vugraphzdc: neth coming back!|pg|| nt|ahollan1: the last 4 boards ALL double-digit swings|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 14, 10, 14, 12|pg|| pg|| qx|o27|st||md|1ST632HA9D54CQT862,SK9HQJ84DK932CA54,SQ4HKT7652DQJ6CK7,SAJ875H3DAT87CJ93|sv|o|mb|p|mb|1N|an| |mb|2D!|an|1 major, constructive|mb|3H!|an|spades inv+|mb|d|mb|p!|mb|p|mb|r!|mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|h5|nt|jesperdall: My wife is asking me what I am doing...what should I tell her? Trying to predict the unpredictable?|pg|| pc|h3|pc|hA|pc|h4|pg|| nt|jesperdall: close match now!|pg|| nt|pelu: B26 E found the only klead to give away 6@d: @hA - +12 to NL all other leads +13 to Denmark |pg|| pc|h9|pc|hQ|pc|hK|pc|s5|pg|| nt|pelu: so a unlucky action by East cost 39 IMP in 2 boards :(:(|pg|| pc|sJ|pc|s2|pc|s9|pc|sQ|pg|| nt|pelu: @cK will work fine now|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c3|pc|c2|pc|cA|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s4|pc|s7|pc|s3|pg|| pc|d3|pc|dQ|pc|dA|pc|d4|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s6|pc|c4|pc|h2|pg|| pc|d7|pc|d5|pc|d9|pc|dJ|pg|| pc|c7|pc|c9|pc|cT|pc|c5|pg|| pc|sT|pc|d2|pc|d6|pc|s8|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|dK|pc|h6|pc|cJ|pg|| pc|c6|pc|h8|pc|h7|pc|d8|pg|| pc|c8|pc|hJ|pc|hT|pc|dT|pg|| nt|jesperdall: down four, just as predicted...|pg|| pg|| qx|c27|st||md|1ST632HA9D54CQT862,SK9HQJ84DK932CA54,SQ4HKT7652DQJ6CK7,SAJ875H3DAT87CJ93|sv|o|nt|ahollan1: can we have another 1@D opener for west please?|pg|| mb|p|mb|1D!|nt|ahollan1: thank you|pg|| mb|2H|mb|2S|mb|3H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|c9|pc|cT|pc|cA|pc|c7|pg|| pc|sK|nt|ahollan1: leads 2nd/4th 9 from 9x|pg|| pc|s4|pc|s5|pc|s2|pg|| nt|ahollan1: so other worthless doubletons lead LOW|pg|| pc|d2|pc|dQ|pc|dA|pc|d4|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s9|pc|sQ|pg|| pc|d7|pc|d5|pc|dK|pc|d6|pg|| pc|d3|pc|dJ|pc|d8|pc|c2|pg|| pc|h2|pc|h3|pc|hA|pc|h4|pg|| pc|h9|pc|hJ|pc|hK|pc|c3|pg|| mc|6|pg|| qx|o28|st||md|2S73HADAJ943CAQ753,SJ4HK98742D65CK84,SQT98652H5DK82CJ2,SAKHQJT63DQT7CT96|sv|n|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|4H|nt|pelu: if u had predicted that then u sh very fast go for a lotto-coupon, Jesper :)|pg|| nt|jesperdall: ;)|pg|| mb|4N|mb|p|mb|5D|mb|p|mb|p|nt|jesperdall: Anyway, great to watch a very lively set in this match|pg|| mb|p|pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s4|pc|s8|pg|| nt|pelu: 4@h down 2 - so wise by W not to bid 5@h - 5@d looks down 1|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s7|pc|sJ|pc|sT|pg|| nt|pelu: N has no entry to the fine @s-suit|pg|| nt|jesperdall: Good decision by East here - easy to support with SUPPORT|pg|| pc|cT|nt|pelu: as u can see 4@s the best chance but inpossible to bid for NS|pg|| nt|jesperdall: I agree - after 2@h, I can't see a way to 4@s for NS|pg|| nt|vugraphzcz: probably Bilde sees that he soo doesnt need this finesse but there is no 2 entries to his hand to finesse diamond and pulling spades|pg|| nt|pelu: N has a weak 2@s but over weak 2@h u dont bid on weak hands|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c4|pc|c2|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d5|pc|d2|pc|d7|pg|| pc|d3|pc|d6|pc|dK|pc|dT|pg|| pc|sQ|nt|pelu: down 2 now|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|c28|st||md|2S73HADAJ943CAQ753,SJ4HK98742D65CK84,SQT98652H5DK82CJ2,SAKHQJT63DQT7CT96|sv|n|mb|2D!|nt|ahollan1: 27 just trying to keep up the high imp exchange rate|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 2@D = (5)6+@H/@S, 2-9 hcp |pg|| mb|3S|nt|ahollan1: dennis did not bid over natural 2@H opener|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: most pairs play 3 @S as strong here|pg|| mb|4H|nt|ahollan1: 3@S is supposed to be "sound preempt"|pg|| nt|ahollan1: the idea being that you do NOT preempt against a preempt|pg|| mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|5H|nt|ahollan1: for the natural preemptors 2@H-P-4@H-4N//P-? 5@D?|pg|| nt|ahollan1: Louk Verhees must think this is NS hand|pg|| mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|hA|pc|h2|pc|h5|pc|h3|pg|| pc|s3|pc|sJ|pc|sQ|nt|ahollan1: Ed Manfield would definitely approve of DBL |pg|| pc|sA|pg|| nt|ahollan1: http://www.bridgeace.com/lessons/BOLS/1987_Manfield_Five_Level.pdf|pg|| nt|ahollan1: i highly recommend reading the other BOLS tips at that site|pg|| pc|sK|pc|s7|pc|s4|pc|s5|pg|| pc|hT|pc|d3|pc|hK|pc|s9|pg|| pc|d5|pc|d8|pc|dT|pc|dJ|pg|| nt|ahollan1: does Verhees need to break @C now?|pg|| pc|d4|pc|d6|pc|dK|pc|d7|pg|| nt|ahollan1: that would make defense easier for van Prooijen|pg|| pc|d2|pc|dQ|pc|dA|pc|h4|pg|| pc|h7|pc|s2|pc|hQ|pc|c3|pg|| pc|cT|pc|c5|pc|c4|pc|cJ|pg|| mc|8|nt|vugraphzdc: netherlands leading!|pg|| pg|| qx|o29|st||md|3SKQJ963HK53DA63C6,SA852HT9DJT875CQ8,S7HAJ4DQ942CAT543,ST4HQ8762DKCKJ972|sv|b|mb|1C|mb|1H|mb|1S!|an|5+|mb|p|nt|jesperdall: How about the 1@h overcall, Peter?|pg|| mb|1N|mb|p|nt|pelu: now prob 4@s by S|pg|| mb|2D!|an|gf relay|mb|p|nt|pelu: 2@d = GF - ask for distribution|pg|| mb|3D|mb|p|nt|pelu: I dont understand why asking and not just bid 4@s|pg|| nt|jesperdall: I would overcall 1@h all the time - despite threats from several of the kibitzers|pg|| mb|3S|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|jesperdall: On 28, Denmark bid 5@h down three|pg|| nt|pelu: ok even a @c-lead cany defeat 3NT|pg|| pc|h2|pc|h3|pc|h9|pc|hJ|pg|| nt|jesperdall: East leading hearts knowing that North has clubs for real. Hmm...|pg|| pc|s7|pc|s4|pc|sK|pc|s2|pg|| pc|sQ|nt|pelu: but nthat was over 4@s - a lucky make|pg|| pc|s5|pc|c3|pc|sT|pg|| pc|sJ|pc|sA|pc|d4|pc|c7|pg|| nt|pelu: over 2@d (multi) the dutch N could jump to 3@s weak - special agreement that worked fine here|pg|| pc|cQ|mc|11|nt|vugraphzcz: Dennis claimed but Netherlands wanted to give them a trick since the king of diamonds was singleton|pg|| pg|| qx|c29|st||md|3SKQJ963HK53DA63C6,SA852HT9DJT875CQ8,S7HAJ4DQ942CAT543,ST4HQ8762DKCKJ972|sv|b|mb|1D!|mb|1H|nt|ahollan1: if i'm awake -- declarer did have chance there to save a trick|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: and... 1 @D again|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 1@D = 10-15, 0+@D many hand types|pg|| mb|2D|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: 2@D = 6@S a) FG b) non-inv|pg|| nt|ahollan1: sorry verhees would still hold @CAQ so no endplay|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: I'm not awake, I didn't see that chance|pg|| mb|2S|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: the potential was there if @CJ @CQ exchanged|pg|| mb|4C|nt|ahollan1: 2@S = to play opposite the weak variety|pg|| mb|p|nt|ahollan1: 4@C splinter|pg|| mb|4H|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: 6 losers opposite hand willing to play 2@S opposite weak hand|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: what are chances vanProoijen can have 5 of 6 needed cover cards?|pg|| nt|ahollan1: for slam|pg|| pc|c7|nt|ahollan1: i guess there is remote possibility of something like x Axx KQxxx Axxx|pg|| nt|ahollan1: not really sure of the cutoff for where opener will NOT bid 2@S|pg|| pc|c6|pc|cQ|pc|cA|pg|| nt|ahollan1: oh and if singleton @S must hope @S10 or it falls|pg|| pc|s7|pc|s4|pc|sK|pc|s2|pg|| nt|ahollan1: i'm trying to talk myself out of 2@S-4@S but not doing a very good job|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|sA|pc|c3|pc|sT|pg|| pc|hT|pc|h4|pc|h2|pc|hK|pg|| pc|sJ|pc|s5|pc|c4|pc|h6|pg|| pc|s9|pc|s8|pc|c5|pc|c2|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d8|pc|d2|pc|dK|pg|| pc|d3|pc|dT|pc|dQ|mc|11|pg|| qx|o30|st||md|4ST84HA762DKT98CQT,S962HKQJDJ73CJ643,SAJ5HT5DA6542CA92,SKQ73H9843DQCK875|sv|o|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|d|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|p|nt|pelu: I am told that "weak-over-weak" has been very popular in Netherlands the last few years|pg|| mb|p|pc|c5|nt|pelu: we have all told our students: dont bid weak over weak :)|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|c4|pc|c9|pg|| pc|dK|pc|d3|pc|d2|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|d8|pc|d7|pc|d5|pc|s3|pg|| pc|d9|pc|dJ|pc|dA|pc|h3|pg|| pc|d4|pc|h4|pc|dT|pc|s6|pg|| pc|s4|pc|s2|pc|sJ|pc|sQ|pg|| pc|c7|pc|cT|pc|cJ|pc|cA|pg|| pc|sA|pc|s7|pc|s8|pc|s9|pg|| pc|d6|pc|h8|pc|h2|pc|c3|pg|| pc|h5|pc|h9|pc|hA|nt|pelu: danish women +1 against the strong french team, and danish seniors down 2 against Ireland|pg|| pc|hJ|pg|| mc|9|pg|| qx|c30|st||md|4ST84HA762DKT98CQT,S962HKQJDJ73CJ643,SAJ5HT5DA6542CA92,SKQ73H9843DQCK875|sv|o|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|d|nt|ahollan1: another multi-meaning 1@D|pg|| mb|r|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: RDBL = 4+@H|pg|| nt|ahollan1: PASS would make for a very interesting board|pg|| mb|1N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: 1N = 11-13|pg|| pc|sK|nt|vugraphzdc: @SK too aggressive for my taste, but that's why I'm operator and not player, as spec pointed out last match|pg|| pc|s4|pc|s2|pc|sA|pg|| pc|d2|pc|dQ|pc|dK|pc|d3|pg|| pc|d8|pc|d7|pc|d4|nt|ahollan1: restricted choice wins over "8-ever 9-never"|pg|| pc|h3|pg|| pc|d9|pc|dJ|pc|dA|pc|c5|pg|| nt|ahollan1: essentially east might play @DQ or @DJ from original QJ but MUST play @DQ from singleton|pg|| nt|ahollan1: so odd favor the finesse|pg|| pc|d5|pc|c7|pc|dT|pc|c3|pg|| pc|sT|pc|s6|pc|s5|nt|ahollan1: restricted choice is a topic that you should all try to study [it takes more than one reading]|pg|| nt|ahollan1: if you're lucky you have access to Terence Reese's "Expert Play" or "Master Play"|pg|| nt|ahollan1: same book but different title depending upon which side of the pond you're on|pg|| pc|s3|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: I have "Reese on Play"|pg|| pc|cQ|pc|c4|pc|c2|pc|cK|pg|| pc|sQ|pc|s8|pc|s9|pc|sJ|pg|| pc|s7|nt|ahollan1: that book on most list of Top 10 Classics on Play|pg|| pc|h2|pc|hK|pc|h5|pg|| pc|h4|pc|hA|pc|hJ|pc|hT|pg|| pc|cT|pc|c6|pc|c9|pc|c8|pg|| mc|9|nt|ahollan1: no way he absolutle overtook with @CA|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: sorry, quick play in the end, maybe I got a trick wrong|pg|| pg|| qx|o31|st||md|1SKQTHT84DQ62CJ985,SJ8652H97DAJT84C7,S94HKQJ653DK97CQ2,SA73HA2D53CAKT643|sv|n|mb|p|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|2N|mb|p|mb|3H!|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|h8|nt|pelu: as I remember NS play that D of 3@h = dont play @h|pg|| pc|h7|pc|hJ|pc|hA|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c5|pc|c7|pc|c2|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c8|pc|h9|pc|cQ|pg|| pc|d3|nt|pelu: can make: 2@c @c discard a @h and then @d to 10|pg|| pc|d6|pc|dJ|pc|dK|pg|| nt|pelu: wd by EW|pg|| pc|d9|pc|d5|pc|d2|pc|dT|pg|| pc|d4|pc|d7|pc|s7|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|sA|pc|sT|pc|s2|pc|s4|pg|| pc|s3|pc|sK|pc|s5|pc|s9|pg|| mc|10|pg|| qx|c31|st||md|1SKQTHT84DQ62CJ985,SJ8652H97DAJT84C7,S94HKQJ653DK97CQ2,SA73HA2D53CAKT643|sv|n|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|ahollan1: vugraph lineup for tomorrow eventually show up at http://livebridge.net/bbo/sessions.php?eventid=1024|pg|| pc|hK|pc|hA|pc|h4|pc|h7|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c5|pc|c7|pc|c2|pg|| pc|cK|pc|c8|pc|h9|pc|cQ|pg|| pc|d3|nt|ahollan1: it does already show match-ups for session18 [RR15]|pg|| pc|d6|pc|dJ|pc|dK|pg|| pc|hQ|pc|h2|pc|h8|pc|s2|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 2@S was 5+M 5+m, 2-9 hcp|pg|| pc|dA|pc|d7|pc|d5|pc|d2|pg|| pc|d4|pc|d9|pc|s7|pc|dQ|pg|| pc|sA|pc|sT|pc|s5|pc|s4|pg|| pc|s3|mc|10|nt|ahollan1: after tomorrow top 9 from each group in Open advance bottom 9 go home|pg|| pg|| qx|o32|st||md|2SA3HQJT742DA93CJT,SKQ7652HDKQJ876C9,S4H863DT4CAKQ5432,SJT98HAK95D52C876|sv|e|mb|1S|mb|2C|mb|3C!|mb|3H|nt|pelu: ok last board - at this table we have seen very good bridge - many tx til Brigitta our operator - again u have done a perfect job|pg|| mb|3S|mb|4H|nt|vugraphzcz: tomorrow the 1st set starts at 10:00!! Good bye for now :)|pg|| mb|d|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|5C|mb|d|mb|5H|nt|pelu: 5@c easy down but can NS make 5@hS? No|pg|| mb|5S|mb|p|mb|p|nt|pelu: ols man Morten: pass (or D) :):)|pg|| nt|pelu: old|pg|| nt|pelu: 5@h: @s to Ace - @HQ to King - if E now play @s again then makign but that would be a very bad defense|pg|| mb|p|pc|cK|pc|c6|pc|cT|pc|c9|pg|| pc|cA|pc|c7|pc|cJ|pc|s2|pg|| pc|s5|pc|s4|pc|s8|pc|sA|pg|| nt|pelu: tx all see u tomorrow at 10.00!!!|pg|| mc|10|nt|Aurora: All results here: http://www.eurobridge.org/repository/competitions/14Opatija/microsite/Results.htm|pg|| nt|Aurora: Thanks to all Commentators, operators and kibitzes. See you tomorrow for another session: http://livebridge.net/bbo/session.php?eventid=1024&sessionid=19|pg|| pg|| qx|c32|st||md|2SA3HQJT742DA93CJT,SKQ7652HDKQJ876C9,S4H863DT4CAKQ5432,SJT98HAK95D52C876|sv|e|nt|ahollan1: thanks Raffael|pg|| mb|1S|mb|2C|nt|vugraphzdc: last hand board here, and it looks like it's an interesting one|pg|| mb|3D!|mb|4H|mb|4S|nt|ahollan1: who's hand is it? sure can't tell from the auction|pg|| mb|5C|nt|ahollan1: and have to look very carefully at all 4 hands to form a decent opinion|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: it's a board where I cant imagine that the final contract is not doubled - whatever it is|pg|| mb|d|mb|p|mb|5S|nt|ahollan1: too right :)|pg|| mb|5N|mb|d|nt|ahollan1: seems Konow was right with DBL seems Askgaard was wrong [assuming @CA lead] but Ricco vanProoijen not in on tht joke|pg|| nt|ahollan1: 5NX actually not a horrible result|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: best one available!|pg|| nt|ahollan1: better than 6@CX|pg|| mb|p|nt|ahollan1: i'm still not sure about play of 6@HX|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: ah, west lacking trump to ruff @C :) I see|pg|| nt|pelu: @s to Ace - @hQ to K and now @d|pg|| mb|p|mb|6H|mb|d|mb|p|nt|pelu: = down 2|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: I love those auctions with three or more doubles in a row|pg|| nt|ahollan1: and 5@CX can go down 3|pg|| nt|ahollan1: does Konow have any more DBL cards in the bid box?|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: so it was not a verschlimmbesserung :)|pg|| nt|vugraphzdc: now, doubles are gone|pg|| nt|ahollan1: Raffael was paying attention -- i should have been nervous|pg|| mb|p|mb|p|pc|dK|pc|d4|pc|d2|pc|d3|pg|| nt|Aurora: All results here: http://www.eurobridge.org/repository/competitions/14Opatija/microsite/Results.htm|pg|| nt|Aurora: Thanks to all Commentators, operators and kibitzes. See you tomorrow for another session: http://livebridge.net/bbo/session.php?eventid=1024&sessionid=19|pg|| pc|dJ|pc|dT|pc|d5|pc|dA|pg|| pc|d9|pc|dQ|pc|h8|pc|h9|pg|| nt|ahollan1: voice commentary saying start time tomorrow 30 minutes earlier so check schedule!|pg|| nt|pelu: thats correct 10.00 local time|pg|| pc|hA|pc|h2|pc|s2|pc|h3|pg|| pc|hK|nt|ahollan1: show of hands -- how many of the spectators are in same timezone as the venue|pg|| pc|h4|mc|9|nt|pelu: have a nice evening - no soccer tonight :) - and again tx brigitta|pg|| nt|Aurora: All results here: http://www.eurobridge.org/repository/competitions/14Opatija/microsite/Results.htm|pg|| pg||