vg|D EC 2011 Open Teams Swiss _,2_7,I,21,30,Zaleski,0,Greece,0|
rs|6DE+1,6CE+1,4SN=,4SN-1,6SE=,4SW+2,4HS+2,4HS+2,2HN-1,3DW-1,4SN=,4SN=,4SW=,4SW-1,5DE-2,3NE-1,2HW+1,3HW-1,4HN=,4DS+1|
pn|D Avossa,Eidi,Intonti,Vroustis,DOXIADIS ,VERSACE,KANNAVOS,LAURIA|pg||
qx|o21|st||md|3ST65432HKJ83D8C62,SQHQDAJT6542CAQ73,SKJ97H9642DQ3CT94,SA8HAT75DK97CKJ85|sv|n|mb|p|mb|1N|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|kirp:  Interesting hand to start off with, 13 trix|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
mb|2N|an| |mb|p|nt|kirp:  2N a trf!|pg||
mb|3D|nt|bernix: hi all|pg||
mb|p|mb|3H|mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: hi :)|pg||
nt|bernix: welcome to the last round for today of semifinal A of European Open|pg||
mb|4C|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|4N|mb|p|mb|5D|mb|p|nt|kirp:  Key card should get them there easily now|pg||
nt|bernix: 27 teams from semi A + 5 from semi B proceed to knock-out stage |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|kirp:  do either of these teams have a chance of making the KO?|pg||
nt|bernix: they're the bottom 2 teams but still 27 out of 46 teams qualify. both need a comprehensive victory|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: Eidi is still thinking :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: what a fascinating board for the beginning :)|pg||
nt|kirp:  Wondering if he needs Q@D|pg||
nt|bernix: if 3@d promises a fit, he certainly won't need her|pg||
mb|6D|mb|p|mb|p|nt|bernix: coward :)|pg||
mb|p|pc|c6|nt|kirp:  5N here would have asked for any outdie K|pg||
nt|kirp:  outside not outdie|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
pc|c3|pc|c9|pc|cJ|pg||
mc|13|nt|kirp:  Each table had a chance for a pickup, no swing|pg||
nt|bernix: i returned from poznan yesterday (played only mixed). wonderful city |pg||
pg||
qx|c21|st||md|3ST65432HKJ83D8C62,SQHQDAJT6542CAQ73,SKJ97H9642DQ3CT94,SA8HAT75DK97CKJ85|sv|n|nt|hedyg: voila!|pg||
nt|hedyg: i will get their CC|pg||
nt|roswolf: wildish bd to start with|pg||
nt|hedyg: afraid i have no CC for NS. lets assume Polish @c ?|pg||
nt|roswolf: blacks v reds|pg||
nt|roswolf: ok hedy|pg||
nt|jbgood: ...and with 2 honors:)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: enjoy :)|pg||
mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|nt|grebrof: mini-nt from S|pg||
nt|rcerreto: 2@d = one major?|pg||
nt|grebrof: I think 8-12 or something 1st seat nonvul 1st/2nt favourable|pg||
nt|jbgood: and 3 NT on for EW|pg||
nt|rcerreto: hi all|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: hi everyone! :)|pg||
nt|rcerreto: a grand just to start|pg||
mb|3S|nt|hedyg: Angelini's own version of strong @c: http://www.ecatsbridge.org/documents/files/ConventionCards/2008Pau-european/OpenTeams/Italy/angelini-sementa.pdf|pg||
nt|grebrof: 2@d porbably one major|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: 3@C should show spade tolerance|pg||
nt|hedyg: EW CC: http://www.ecatsbridge.org/documents/files/ConventionCards/2010Ostend-european/OpenTeams/germany/piekarek-smirnov.pdf|pg||
nt|rcerreto: let's how Lauria-Versace's system works|pg||
nt|rcerreto: let's see|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: last session for today |pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: enjoy!|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: :)|pg||
nt|rcerreto: thanks Simona|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html |pg||
mb|4C|nt|hedyg: strong @c system|pg||
nt|rcerreto: don't know what 3@s means, sorry|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: now south has not got much to guide him|pg||
nt|grebrof: 2nd...|pg||
mb|4D|nt|hedyg: yes Geoffrey agree with 3 @c|pg||
nt|rcerreto: 2@h (pass or correct) was a little pessimistic maybe|pg||
mb|p|mb|4H|nt|roswolf: a good bd for the german pair|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: yes they are playing 2@c= majors, 2@d= 1 M, 2@H/S nat +minor|pg||
nt|jbgood: often called multilandy|pg||
mb|4S|nt|hedyg: well they play X= hcps which is not multilandy, thats why i didnt call it by a name|pg||
mb|d|nt|MolvaM: 4s could have played quite nicely|pg||
nt|hedyg: no more ruffs of @d|pg||
nt|odysseus69: good afternoon all = welcome to the last of 7 round robin with 3 from 8 teams qualifying for Swiss A|pg||
nt|runnerup: hi all -ew leading his group|pg||
nt|odysseus69: bidding does not appear to match the hands|pg||
nt|stc: hi|pg||
nt|grebrof: and now J of @h? - here, just play trumps - need only 8 tricks|pg||
mb|r|nt|stc: sometthing is fishy here :)|pg||
nt|odysseus69: had problems in round 5 with wrong hands- maybe same again|pg||
nt|odysseus69: at least South has the 4 of diamonds|pg||
mb|p|nt|odysseus69: Roland will sort it out|pg||
mb|4N|nt|vugraphpl3: i dont know too sorry... they told but i didnt heard|pg||
mb|p|mb|5D|nt|rcerreto: don't you mind|pg||
mb|p|mb|5S|mb|p|nt|rcerreto: I've been tolf that 3@s showed minors, at least 5-4|pg||
nt|rcerreto: told|pg||
nt|rcerreto: then, 4@c sets @c|pg||
nt|rcerreto: 4@d/@h/@s are cuebids|pg||
nt|granguru:  HI ALL|pg||
nt|Walddk1: Welcome to John and Cengiz|pg||
nt|arigun: hi all|pg||
nt|rcerreto: rdbl is 1st round control in @s|pg||
nt|rcerreto: 4NT shows extra strength|pg||
nt|granguru:  7@C OR 7@D |pg||
nt|granguru:  7nt |pg||
nt|rcerreto: 5@d is cue in @D, forward going|pg||
mb|5N|nt|jbgood: spade might have worked better|pg||
mb|p|mb|6C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|jbgood: instead of a di return|pg||
nt|rcerreto: missed|pg||
pc|h3|pc|hQ|nt|granguru:  3@S is the problem...|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h5|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c9|pc|cJ|pc|c2|pg||
pc|c5|pc|c6|pc|cA|pc|c4|pg||
nt|grebrof: more optimism at the other table|pg||
nt|rcerreto: can't tell what went wrong|pg||
nt|granguru:  it ensures 5-4 so 9 tricks if all minor cards are won|pg||
nt|rcerreto: but something did, clearly|pg||
mc|13|pg||
qx|o22|st||md|4S432HK84DK976CJ95,SK6HT53DQT542CKT2,SAQJ87HAQ96DCQ743,ST95HJ72DAJ83CA86|sv|e|nt|vugraphpl2: it's nice to hear that :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: i live in poznan since i borned :)|pg||
mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: and i love this city :)|pg||
nt|kirp:  this hand looks like a part score|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|1S|an| |mb|p|mb|2S|nt|bernix: 2@s most likely|pg||
nt|kirp:  maybe 4@S|pg||
mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|bernix: closed room more optimistic|pg||
nt|kirp:  probably goes down on @C lie|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|kirp:  still, not easy to defend|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|bernix: even on a favourable @c distr. 4@s not a great game. might get tapped in @ds|pg||
mb|3H|mb|p|nt|kirp:  can probably make 4@S if @Cs are played counter-intuitively, on 2nd @C, need E to win it|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|kirp:  very lucky lie of K@S|pg||
pc|sT|nt|kirp:  N says ty E|pg||
pc|s2|nt|vugraphpl2: :)|pg||
pc|s6|pc|sJ|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c8|pc|c9|pc|cT|pg||
nt|kirp:  good play by W|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c3|nt|bernix: west must switch to @ds now|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c5|pg||
pc|c6|pc|cJ|pc|cK|nt|kirp:  10 trix now|pg||
pc|cQ|pg||
nt|bernix: that's 10 imps to zaleski|pg||
pc|sK|pc|sA|pc|s5|pc|s3|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s9|pc|s4|pc|d5|pg||
pc|s8|pc|d3|nt|bernix: in closed room declarer pulled trumps before exiting in @cs. west switched to @ds - curtains|pg||
pc|d6|pc|d4|pg||
nt|kirp:  now a @H @D squeeze, not necessary as cards lie|pg||
pc|s7|pc|d8|pc|d7|pc|h3|pg||
pc|c7|pc|dJ|pc|d9|pc|d2|pg||
nt|bernix: just in case ..|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h2|pc|h4|pc|h5|pg||
pc|h6|pc|h7|pc|hK|pc|hT|pg||
pc|h8|pc|dT|pc|hA|pc|hJ|pg||
pc|h9|pc|dA|pc|dK|pc|dQ|pg||
pg||
qx|c22|st||md|4S432HK84DK976CJ95,SK6HT53DQT542CKT2,SAQJ87HAQ96DCQ743,ST95HJ72DAJ83CA86|sv|e|nt|MolvaM: and could bring the advantage of pushing opps to 5@h|pg||
nt|hedyg: on an A@S lead N could have played K@S and then..............the result would be -2|pg||
nt|jbgood: 5@c excellent here|pg||
nt|rcerreto: careful defense needed to set 5@c|pg||
nt|granguru:  plus all side controls E cant count 13 tricks|pg||
nt|granguru:  so W should be the captain here|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: K@S preferential for @D of course|pg||
nt|roswolf: a trappy bd for n/s|pg||
nt|roswolf: too easy to play in 3nt|pg||
nt|hedyg: 5@H -2 as well|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|odysseus69: they played board 10|pg||
nt|odysseus69: this loks very dubious too|pg||
nt|rcerreto: a @s lead shouldn't be difficult to find|pg||
mb|1S|nt|runnerup: very weak opening or problems here also|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: which may well make with the diamonds 3-3|pg||
nt|Walddk1: Patience please|pg||
nt|Walddk1: Operator catching up'|pg||
nt|Walddk1: They started with board 10 here for some reason|pg||
nt|Walddk1: We think the operator redealt to the werong board|pg||
nt|Walddk1: but that everything is OK now|pg||
nt|odysseus69: got the right players in the right seats - all we need is the right cards- we are patient tolerant sympathetic and understanding|pg||
nt|rcerreto: then, blockage in @d sets|pg||
mb|2S|nt|hedyg: Angelini is on lead with KQJ@S, he should find the lead|pg||
nt|rcerreto: Angelini might be thinking to bid 5|pg||
nt|jbgood: not over yet...|pg||
nt|hedyg: he has a double with those @ss?|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: EW are by some considered to now be the best European pair|pg||
mb|4S|mb|p|nt|roswolf: certainly they have some fine results in their locker:)|pg||
nt|jbgood: no Hedy|pg||
nt|hedyg: no you are right ofc|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: 5@H is insurance|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: they sure do|pg||
nt|roswolf: might take the heart finesse first|pg||
nt|hedyg: i am having problems connecting to BBO Mobile, is it only me?|pg||
nt|MolvaM: everything works|pg||
nt|hedyg: or better, problems connecting to a table|pg||
pc|s5|nt|hedyg: ok :(|pg||
pc|s2|nt|rcerreto: a cheap save, too bad it's a phantom|pg||
nt|hedyg: N might have void in @H|pg||
pc|sK|nt|Walddk1: West's name is   Westra|pg||
nt|Walddk1: North's is  Matushko|pg||
nt|Walddk1: East and West are correct|pg||
nt|Walddk1: N-S are from Russia|pg||
nt|odysseus69: doesnt look like way to play 3NT|pg||
nt|odysseus69: guess the contract is a new test|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: auction is wrong... but contract is good|pg||
nt|odysseus69: not that 3NT is a likely spot - 4C possibly but then why heart king|pg||
nt|runnerup: good -but not makeable |pg||
pc|sA|pg||
nt|MolvaM: even clubs|pg||
nt|odysseus69: probably trick 2 was losing club finesse|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s9|nt|toral5: hello all|pg||
pc|s3|pc|s6|pg||
pc|sJ|pc|sT|nt|roswolf: strange looking line|pg||
pc|s4|nt|rcerreto: @s behaving, @h behaving...|pg||
pc|d2|pg||
nt|MolvaM: combine chances in the minors and avoid the@h finesse|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c6|pc|c9|pc|cT|pg||
nt|rcerreto: it will make|pg||
pc|d4|nt|arigun: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html click on team names to see team members and running scores|pg||
nt|rcerreto: hmmm|pg||
nt|rcerreto: getting in trouble now|pg||
pc|c4|pc|dA|pc|d6|pg||
nt|granguru:  W didnt know apparently about the @DK..if 5@D was a cue as said..W should have bid 7|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c5|pc|c2|pc|c7|pg||
pc|c8|pc|cJ|pc|cK|pc|cQ|pg||
nt|MolvaM: board 21 was a double game swing for bessis|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|o23|st||md|1S982H9653DJ4CT632,SKQJ7HQ2DK85CK754,ST3HAJT4D7632CQJ9,SA654HK87DAQT9CA8|sv|b|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
mb|1C|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|p|nt|bernix: exciting set of hands|pg||
mb|1N|mb|p|nt|kirp:  missed slam in CR|pg||
mb|2S|mb|p|nt|bernix: intresting whether they're able to sniff out the spade slam|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl  |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins  |pg||
mb|3S|mb|p|mb|4C|mb|p|nt|bernix: fasten seat belts and off we go|pg||
mb|4D|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|nt|bernix: i dare to predict a lot of imps are going to change hands in this match|pg||
nt|kirp:  Only thing missing from W is A's|pg||
mb|4N|mb|p|mb|5D|mb|p|nt|kirp:  Good take charge by W|pg||
mb|6S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|kirp:  Match is almost even now|pg||
pc|h6|pc|h2|nt|bernix: obviously EW are playing a weak NT |pg||
pc|hA|pc|h7|pg||
pc|d6|pc|dT|pc|dJ|pc|dK|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s3|pc|s4|pc|s2|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|sT|pc|s5|pc|s8|pg||
mc|12|pg||
qx|c23|st||md|1S982H9653DJ4CT632,SKQJ7HQ2DK85CK754,ST3HAJT4D7632CQJ9,SA654HK87DAQT9CA8|sv|b|nt|odysseus69: 3rd time lucky?|pg||
nt|stc: Flat 3NT because of friendly @ds|pg||
nt|rcerreto: playing a @c to the J he could have discarded a @c on the @d return|pg||
mb|p|nt|rcerreto: but not after loosing to the 10|pg||
mb|1C|nt|hedyg: 15 imps is huge in 10 board matches|pg||
nt|hedyg: you can practically say the match is over except for a miracle|pg||
nt|jbgood: Fugleastad must be diciplined not to get too high here|pg||
mb|p|nt|MolvaM: on the positve side, they have 9 boards to recover|pg||
mb|1D|nt|hedyg: while the opps twiddle their thumbs?|pg||
nt|granguru:  6KC RCKB is well suited for these 2-suited hands, specially after a NT opening|pg||
mb|p|nt|jbgood: and she is|pg||
mb|1S|nt|stc: even 4@h would make|pg||
nt|odysseus69: mini NT is at least credible and Syayman looks OK so on track now|pg||
nt|runnerup: destany was 4 down some misfif and 10+10  |pg||
nt|odysseus69: 3NT from North will confirm all is well|pg||
nt|rcerreto: Lauria wasn't in a forgiving mood|pg||
nt|rcerreto: after playing 6+1|pg||
nt|granguru:  another slam here|pg||
nt|rcerreto: yes|pg||
mb|p|mb|2H!|an| |nt|odysseus69: 3NT from South if 3D suggested diamonds + 4 spades|pg||
nt|rcerreto: this hand would be scary if playing "Gazzilli"|pg||
nt|jbgood: 2@d more flexible?|pg||
nt|hedyg: it is scary anyhow|pg||
nt|hedyg: surely 2@d denies 5+@hs|pg||
mb|p|mb|3D|nt|MolvaM: well, its a difficult life being a positivist :)|pg||
nt|rcerreto: but @h are stronger, moreover if you get raised you'd be happy|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: well north did bid 3@C over 2@H led to 5@CX=|pg||
nt|rcerreto: I like better 2@h|pg||
nt|jbgood: i like it better too:)|pg||
nt|arigun: @s and @d are friendly to establish 12 tricks easily|pg||
nt|granguru:  6@S @DJ fall make it easy to win|pg||
nt|rcerreto: a knowledgeable spec tells me that 2@h shows a GF in @s with no singleton|pg||
mb|3S|nt|runnerup: 3nt +1 is my guess|pg||
nt|odysseus69: some communication problems- expect a club lead|pg||
nt|stc: good defense may keep dec in 9 tricks|pg||
nt|jbgood: better than 2@s anyhow:)|pg||
mb|p|nt|stc: just because the communication problems dec has no choice but @ds|pg||
nt|odysseus69: we can see 3-3 diamonds - declarer cant and will be a little nervous about cashing club ace|pg||
nt|stc: no need to cash the A@c, play all @d then AK@h and @H|pg||
nt|runnerup: i think also that 3 @d doent promice spades,just diamonds and forcing,because yu cant force otherways with only 5 cards|pg||
nt|odysseus69: ok as cards lie - everthing is ok- but if hearts 4-2 then danger of losing 2 hearts and 3 spades- |pg||
nt|odysseus69: however I agree that he shouldnt cash club ace|pg||
nt|stc: there is no danger to loose 2@h and 3@h because defenders has no communications|pg||
nt|runnerup: 26 was not enought to bid game in other table -so leaders will win this board -bacauce 9 at least here|pg||
nt|stc: 2@h and 3@s I mean|pg||
mb|4S|nt|hedyg: lol|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|odysseus69: right -no danger when diamonds 3-3 |pg||
nt|jbgood: but difficult to make|pg||
mb|p|nt|rcerreto: hmmm|pg||
pc|hA|nt|rcerreto: 2@s is where "gazzilli" would have likely landed you|pg||
pc|h7|pc|h6|nt|stc: and with @d 4-2 he needs 3@h tricks and K@s on side|pg||
pc|h2|pg||
nt|arigun: versace has a max for openers first limit but he has only one key card with abalanced hand, hard to bid 6 |pg||
pc|hJ|nt|roswolf: team bessis have 9 more boards to score more is more likely:)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: he played a bit too quickly|pg||
nt|stc: wrong, only K@s on side|pg||
pc|h8|pc|h3|pc|hQ|pg||
pc|sK|nt|MolvaM: diamonds are usually 4-3 but today they are 5-2|pg||
pc|s3|nt|runnerup: he must trust  @d 3-3 anyway|pg||
pc|s4|nt|granguru:  hi all|pg||
pc|s2|pg||
mc|12|nt|roswolf: west doesnt have a trump to return|pg||
nt|hedyg: he can ruff 1|pg||
pg||
qx|o24|st||md|2SKQ7HAQT64DJ98CQ4,SAJ643HJ2DKTCT973,SHK875DAQ654CAJ65,ST9852H93D732CK82|sv|o|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|bernix: another slam ?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: 7 boards to go and only 3IMP different :)|pg||
nt|bernix: 6@h is makeable|pg||
mb|p|mb|1D|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|1S|nt|bernix: but may run into fierce competition in @ss|pg||
mb|3S|nt|kirp:  Prety good slam, needs 1 out of 2 Ks to come home|pg||
mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|nt|bernix: and even that may not be needed|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|pc|cT|nt|kirp:  SO on 2 out of 4 boards, missed salm her, however in CR missed 3 slams on 4 boards|pg||
nt|bernix: i think trumps 2/2 OR 1/2 finesses|pg||
pc|c5|pc|cK|pc|c4|pg||
nt|bernix: but only if played by north :)|pg||
pc|s2|pc|sQ|pc|sA|pc|h5|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h3|pc|h4|pc|h2|pg||
pc|h7|pc|h9|pc|hA|pc|hJ|pg||
mc|12|pg||
qx|c24|st||md|2SKQ7HAQT64DJ98CQ4,SAJ643HJ2DKTCT973,SHK875DAQ654CAJ65,ST9852H93D732CK82|sv|o|nt|hedyg: thuse he does not have 1|pg||
nt|hedyg: thus*|pg||
nt|rcerreto: it's not up to their reputation to miss two slam in a row|pg||
nt|arigun: lauria has a pretty good 17 but i think he was affraid of trump quality|pg||
mb|p|nt|granguru:  NS are beating the 1993 world champions|pg||
nt|hedyg: the ruff was a coincidence|pg||
mb|1D|mb|p|nt|stc: how many teams qualify for the Swiss A phase ?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: 3 :)|pg||
nt|odysseus69: unusual to pass on South as in OR |pg||
nt|runnerup: ew has board this qwuite cheap--ns has 8-9 in majors |pg||
nt|odysseus69: most moderns bid 1S but maybe playing strong club|pg||
mb|1H|nt|granguru:  well in fact a kib rectifies me ..only westra was on that team|pg||
nt|stc: great result for EW in OR|pg||
mb|1S|nt|granguru:  Muller also a memeber is playing in the winning Netherlands red team|pg||
mb|3S|an| |nt|hedyg: yes but he must have though E has A@D not A@S!!|pg||
nt|hedyg: since S did not try a @d finesse nor to ruff out K@D|pg||
nt|MolvaM: but whouldnt declarer have started the diamonds right away?|pg||
nt|hedyg: so why did he play small to the J?|pg||
nt|MolvaM: anyway. its history now and bessis got another 12|pg||
nt|hedyg: it was only obvious to us who saw all cards i think|pg||
nt|MolvaM: right hedy :)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: 3@c trial?|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes the play is so important at this level -you must take care in all contracts|pg||
mb|p|nt|granguru:  Fantoni Nunes also missed both slams|pg||
nt|rcerreto: hard times for Italian players!!|pg||
nt|arigun: another slam hand, for ns this time|pg||
nt|granguru:  players who used 4 suit transfers went easily to 7 through 1NT -3@C way|pg||
nt|rcerreto: it's unclear whether 7-4 is a two-suiter, really|pg||
nt|granguru:  6@H is an excelent slam|pg||
nt|arigun: makes even 7 and no way to go wrong since @dKT is onside|pg||
mb|4C|nt|roswolf: seems obvious|pg||
nt|granguru:  at the time they were the youngest team ever to win a BB|pg||
nt|stc: NS may cash the first 10 tricks here !!|pg||
nt|odysseus69: spade lead works well|pg||
nt|rcerreto: lack of control in @d should keep away from slam|pg||
nt|rcerreto: maybe not|pg||
nt|hedyg: how will they know?|pg||
mb|p|mb|4H|nt|jbgood: difficult to pass 4 NT:)|pg||
mb|p|nt|runnerup: tis is 4- some down -is s! out|pg||
mb|p|nt|MolvaM: on the positive side there are 7 more boards to play :)|pg||
nt|stc: petit appel :)|pg||
nt|odysseus69: 2 down |pg||
nt|stc: but sry, only 8 tricks|pg||
nt|runnerup: can he see it ?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrleaderb.html|pg||
nt|hedyg: difficult to know S does not have KQ@D|pg||
nt|rcerreto: even with the friendly @s layout...|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: well showing his shortage(if he could)may have worked better|pg||
nt|granguru:  what is going on here? |pg||
pc|dT|nt|hedyg: the E hand is limited by not opening 1@c (16+)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: but Kx in trial suit is a nice holding no?|pg||
nt|hedyg: you want to be in game opposite max 15?|pg||
nt|stc: if left alone, dec can make max 6 tricks, still -1|pg||
nt|rcerreto: I'm surprised, why not 4@d from N?|pg||
nt|arigun: maybe @c lead is problem to get 13 trick while playing 6, most probably 12 trick with a high percentage play line|pg||
nt|granguru:  4@D is a must with N hand|pg||
pc|dA|nt|odysseus69: his partner did encourage I assume - |pg||
nt|rcerreto: and...|pg||
pc|d2|nt|runnerup: no but still down 1 |pg||
nt|rcerreto: you're still short|pg||
nt|rcerreto: aren't you?|pg||
nt|hedyg: better to show short on 2NT, then N knows AK@C are wasted values|pg||
nt|jbgood: a cue bid sequence may find a lack of di controls... this was too hasty by Kaninen|pg||
pc|d8|pg||
nt|rcerreto: come on!!!|pg||
pc|h5|nt|rcerreto: what 4@c meant?|pg||
pc|h3|pc|hA|nt|roswolf: yes but hedy's point is valid too -nv probably no big deal anyway|pg||
pc|h2|pg||
nt|granguru:  Good lead by versace|pg||
pc|hQ|nt|stc: wd|pg||
pc|hJ|pc|h7|pc|h9|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|dK|pc|d4|nt|hedyg: with 18+ for sure he opened 1@c|pg||
nt|hedyg: they play a multiway 1@c|pg||
pc|d3|pg||
nt|stc: 7 more IMP|pg||
nt|runnerup: yes declarer had 6 but didnt take those so -2|pg||
nt|granguru:  wwill win 1 IMP? or lose 11?|pg||
mc|12|pg||
qx|o25|st||md|3SKT8742HK6DJ87CJ3,SA3H3DKT65432CA72,S6HAQ7542DAQ9CT95,SQJ95HJT98DCKQ864|sv|e|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|kirp:  hard to value the S hand on last board after splinter from pard|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule  |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins |pg||
nt|kirp:  these hands are not dull|pg||
nt|bernix: after a couple of slams now a delicate misfit hand|pg||
mb|1H|an| |mb|p|mb|1S|mb|2D|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|hJ|nt|bernix: good lead. deprives declarer of a @c ruff|pg||
nt|kirp:  8 trix should still be doable|pg||
nt|kirp:  but closer than you one might think|pg||
nt|bernix: i am sill looking for a way to chalk up 8 tricks|pg||
nt|kirp:  need help from opponents, best to duck the @S play towards dummy, then maybe endplay EW|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: N is still thinking...|pg||
pc|h6|pc|h3|pc|hQ|pg||
pc|s6|pc|sQ|pc|sK|pc|sA|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c5|nt|kirp:  think he is down 1 now,|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|c3|pg||
nt|bernix: now he's got a chance for a push|pg||
pc|h8|pc|hK|pc|s3|pc|h2|pg||
nt|kirp:  W cant pitch 2@D?|pg||
nt|kirp:  may regret that|pg||
nt|kirp:  @S pitch|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|d2|pc|d9|nt|bernix: 4  more imps to greece|pg||
pc|h9|pg||
pc|cK|pc|cJ|pc|c7|nt|bernix: now partner can't make a mistake :)|pg||
pc|c9|pg||
pc|c4|pc|d7|pc|cA|pc|cT|pg||
mc|7|pg||
qx|c25|st||md|3SKT8742HK6DJ87CJ3,SA3H3DKT65432CA72,S6HAQ7542DAQ9CT95,SQJ95HJT98DCKQ864|sv|e|nt|odysseus69: didnt get chance to take|pg||
nt|hedyg: Simona?|pg||
nt|hedyg: are you sure of the result?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: its now ok?! |pg||
nt|jbgood: down 1 registered|pg||
nt|rcerreto: ok|pg||
nt|hedyg: ok now yes, ty|pg||
nt|rcerreto: Zalesky is leading|pg||
nt|rcerreto: 1st board was a push, 6@d+1|pg||
nt|granguru:  I meant win 11..sorry|pg||
mb|1H|mb|p|nt|MolvaM: results page http://www.poznan2011.pl/results|pg||
nt|roswolf: that 2@H SEEMS TO BE A 1 SUITER|pg||
nt|roswolf: needs a 2 suited overcall|pg||
nt|MolvaM: 3nt and 5@d are ok|pg||
nt|rcerreto: let me say: undeservedly|pg||
mb|1S|nt|chilloncan: very aggressive reopening double there, at all green and facing a PH. risk-reward ratio not obviously in favor of action|pg||
nt|roswolf: a firm 3@D followed by a firmer 3nt!?|pg||
mb|2D|nt|rcerreto: after all, there was a tiny chance that she didn't appear to have tested|pg||
nt|jbgood: 8-12 balanced|pg||
nt|jbgood: 2@d|pg||
nt|rcerreto: with @s behaving, one stiff honour in @d would have allowed to make|pg||
nt|granguru:  agree|pg||
mb|2H|nt|roswolf: even if for t/o dont like dbl|pg||
mb|p|nt|odysseus69: looks a flattie|pg||
nt|rcerreto: after elimination|pg||
mb|p|nt|rcerreto: since Lauria-Versace are my friends, I think I can tease them a little :)|pg||
mb|d|nt|MolvaM: what would happen if smirnov could bid 4@h? would olech bid 4@s?|pg||
nt|roswolf: we will never know|pg||
nt|stc: slam is not good but decent here|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: n/s will miss 3nt|pg||
nt|MolvaM: maybe olech should have bid 3NT now|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes i think so|pg||
nt|hedyg: Piek wont let them play anyhow|pg||
nt|MolvaM: so difficult for south to bid it from his side|pg||
nt|granguru:  Bubbo de Boer, westra, Leufkens, Peter jansen, Westerdorf, Muller, Jaap trounborst were the boys|pg||
nt|rcerreto: but it wasn't the case here|pg||
mb|2N|nt|roswolf: may try 3@S -YUK!?|pg||
nt|hedyg: and Smirnov will..........pass|pg||
nt|roswolf: WELL PROBABLY BUT EAST MAY THEN TRY A T/O DBL!?:)|pg||
nt|hedyg: imo when opps want to play in your 6 card suit you should let them :p|pg||
nt|roswolf: south knows he is being mugged but ...........|pg||
nt|hedyg: that independant caps key again Geoff?|pg||
nt|MolvaM: both N/S players created problems and now its a guess if they can reach a makable game|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes it has a life of its own:)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: or the devil made you do it? :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: lol|pg||
nt|roswolf: :)|pg||
nt|roswolf: south hopefully will bid soon|pg||
nt|odysseus69: a fraction better than spade finesse|pg||
nt|stc: slam needs K@s + @s 2-2 or some sort of friendly @c, about 40% I guess|pg||
nt|hedyg: running scores: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|jbgood: can even afford 2 trump losers now since clubs behave|pg||
nt|rcerreto: several alternatives to evaluate|pg||
nt|rcerreto: we can see that any sensible line of play wins|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: would you start with A@S?|pg||
nt|rcerreto: but he has to think|pg||
nt|rcerreto: I wouldn't but it could be right|pg||
nt|jbgood: @s ace and a small one is surely an alternative|pg||
nt|hedyg: ace in any case and think some more :p|pg||
nt|jbgood: but so many other ways|pg||
mb|3D|nt|MolvaM: hands must be bid on the same day that they were dealt :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: so much for 3NT|pg||
nt|roswolf: well 5@D is not a bad spot looking at the n/s cards alone|pg||
nt|hedyg: depending on the lead|pg||
nt|hedyg: i dont play lower level lightners, only vs slam|pg||
nt|roswolf: in the other room 3NTreached with simple elegance|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|roswolf: disaster looms|pg||
nt|hedyg: the timid double by E in OR did not help the defense|pg||
nt|odysseus69: luckier to play from South when club queen would give contract|pg||
nt|granguru:  More amendments: Wubbo de Boer, Enri leufkens, Piet Jansen and ans|pg||
nt|granguru:  old italian systems 8and players) were extremely precise on the slam bidding zone|pg||
pc|s6|nt|roswolf: fielders choice almost|pg||
nt|MolvaM: the disaster started with south's double|pg||
pc|sQ|nt|hedyg: now he runs to 5@D|pg||
nt|hedyg: ?|pg||
nt|granguru:  Hans Westendorf|pg||
nt|granguru:  thanks a lot|pg||
nt|granguru:  one of the reasons for being world champions so many times|pg||
pc|s8|nt|MolvaM: last chance to make a doubled 5@d|pg||
nt|granguru:  Hans Westerhof sorry|pg||
nt|stc: on the way to -13 IMP|pg||
nt|odysseus69: if North had cQ rather than dQ it would be huge slam|pg||
nt|granguru:  NPC Jaap Trouwborst|pg||
nt|stc: yes, and hard to localize the unknown Q|pg||
nt|odysseus69: can make on diamond lead but dont think they will get one|pg||
nt|stc: he can't make even on @d lead|pg||
pc|s3|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c3|nt|hedyg: Q@H in case N covers|pg||
pc|cA|nt|odysseus69: Souths think shows a void and wondering how to respond -no point in showing|pg||
pc|c9|pg||
nt|hedyg: how many @ds does N need to bid them?|pg||
nt|roswolf: hmm well i have been in worse contracts|pg||
nt|stc: he got the @D lead, still -1|pg||
nt|runnerup: not huge possobilities ,now made anyway|pg||
nt|granguru:  Very Bridge Cultivated people I see....I also had the BB in my hands on that ocation, but just to take me a photograph with it!|pg||
nt|granguru:  ocasion*|pg||
nt|odysseus69: sorry - cant even make on diamond lead|pg||
nt|granguru:  should lose 1 in each black suit|pg||
nt|granguru:  no endplay|pg||
nt|granguru:  no no|pg||
nt|stc: he needs QJ@H and QJ@c in the same hand, not the caase|pg||
nt|granguru:  he can drop 2 @C|pg||
pc|d2|nt|hedyg: i am not mad about the double over 4@s|pg||
nt|roswolf: unerring|pg||
nt|granguru:  wron |pg||
nt|runnerup: ok seems impossible to get rid of 2 loosers|pg||
nt|granguru:  wrong play|pg||
pc|d9|pc|c6|nt|stc: and the @H looser ?|pg||
pc|d8|pg||
pc|c5|pc|cK|nt|rcerreto: +1|pg||
pc|cJ|nt|MolvaM: smirnov wanted to get rich instantly but this will also help|pg||
pc|c2|pg||
nt|roswolf: sensible|pg||
nt|hedyg: you know they will run if you double|pg||
nt|granguru:  superprecision was extremely efficient,,,f.i. no way to err 7@D with it..roman club was also very efective.|pg||
nt|rcerreto: I'm sure they'll speak at long on that board at dinner|pg||
nt|granguru:  after RKCB and other tools they lost part of the advaantage..|pg||
pc|s5|nt|arigun: -1 with @c ruff now|pg||
pc|s7|pc|sA|nt|granguru:  y no way|pg||
pc|dQ|pg||
nt|roswolf: just -1 and another 11 imps to team bessis|pg||
nt|MolvaM: do you want to hear my latest update on the positive side of things? :)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: still 4 more boards remain |pg||
nt|MolvaM: 5 rather|pg||
nt|roswolf: lol - 4x24imps would be enough to win 25-0 indeed|pg||
pc|cT|pc|cQ|nt|hedyg: 9 imps/bd? thats a lot|pg||
pc|d7|nt|stc: of course he has 11 tricks and defense must be awake|pg||
nt|granguru:  depended on the @S finesse or some favourable position of the @C|pg||
pc|c7|pg||
pc|sK|pc|d3|pc|dA|nt|granguru:  such as stiff @CQJ or @CH and @CHxxx|pg||
nt|granguru:  abd guessing it|pg||
nt|granguru:  and guessing it|pg||
pc|s9|pg||
nt|granguru:  once I was playing in MIami Olympiad against garozzo and forquet...they missed a 7@C slam ...|pg||
mc|8|pg||
qx|o26|st||md|4ST642HAT9643DKC97,SK8HKJ8DQ762CQ843,SQJ93H2DAJ98CAKJT,SA75HQ75DT543C652|sv|b|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl  |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
nt|kirp:  10+ trix in @S here|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|bernix: run of the mill spade game|pg||
mb|1C|an| |mb|p|mb|1D|an| |mb|p|mb|1S|an| |mb|p|nt|bernix: NS playing transfer responses Maria?|pg||
mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: sorry, but i don't know :(|pg||
nt|kirp:  4@S looks a bit aggressive here, poor trumps, pard has more than enuff himself to go on|pg||
pc|h5|nt|bernix: 1@d shows 4+ @hs and 1@s an unbalanced, good hand with 4 @ss and less than 3 @hs (i guess)|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h8|pc|h2|pg||
pc|dK|pc|d2|pc|d8|pc|d3|pg||
nt|kirp:  easy to play this hand looking at all 4|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c3|pc|cA|pc|c2|pg||
pc|dA|nt|kirp:  less easy at the table, if trumps break 4-1|pg||
pc|d4|pc|h3|pc|d6|pg||
pc|d9|pc|d5|pc|s2|pc|d7|pg||
pc|c9|pc|c4|pc|cK|pc|c5|pg||
pc|cT|pc|c6|pc|s6|pc|c8|pg||
pc|h4|pc|hJ|pc|s3|pc|h7|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|dT|pc|sT|pc|dQ|pg||
pc|s4|pc|sK|nt|kirp:  10 trix|pg||
pc|s9|pc|s5|pg||
mc|10|pg||
qx|c26|st||md|4ST642HAT9643DKC97,SK8HKJ8DQ762CQ843,SQJ93H2DAJ98CAKJT,SA75HQ75DT543C652|sv|b|nt|hedyg: well ok, just 8.5...|pg||
nt|hedyg: piece of cake|pg||
nt|roswolf: yup and very nearly impossible without the Total Improbability Drive |pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: which is a fine Concept by the late Douglas Adams|pg||
nt|odysseus69: action board|pg||
nt|granguru:  they didnt stop arguing for about 5 minutes..in loud Italian voice of course|pg||
mb|p|nt|jbgood: I am told that Angelini is also in 6@h next dorr on   14!|pg||
nt|rcerreto: 5@d in NS|pg||
nt|jbgood: door even|pg||
nt|rcerreto: but EW can get to 5@s -1|pg||
mb|p|nt|stc: a true freak now|pg||
nt|hedyg: yes Hampson in 6@H|pg||
nt|granguru:  and we were losing around 40 IMPs already|pg||
nt|rcerreto: in the while, Greece played in 6@s and got the lead|pg||
mb|1D|nt|granguru:  would you open N or E hands given the opportunity?|pg||
nt|jbgood: 5@s a good save:)|pg||
nt|rcerreto: popular slam contract|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: a chance for some imps to the polish team|pg||
mb|1H|mb|p|nt|stc: OR NS didn't discover the -2 defense|pg||
nt|odysseus69: both|pg||
nt|granguru:  I think no one would pass these days|pg||
mb|1S|nt|rcerreto: verifying you're missing AK@d proved too difficult, after all|pg||
nt|hedyg: Hampson could have stayed out of slam after Greco showed short @c over 2NT|pg||
mb|p|nt|rcerreto: yes, Garozzo and Forquet are made like that :)|pg||
nt|granguru:  of course the grans was hard to reach ..our mates bid up to 5@C|pg||
mb|3S|mb|p|nt|odysseus69: never mind these days- I would have opened 50 years ago|pg||
nt|odysseus69: its opening on balanced 11 counts that I cant master|pg||
nt|granguru:  Bertens should -1 soon if he plays the hand|pg||
mb|4S|nt|stc: in OR N lead the A@c|pg||
nt|granguru:  but NS have slam ambitions again|pg||
nt|jbgood: Brekka is an imaginative player, so you never know what to expect when he preempts green versus red|pg||
nt|jbgood: needs to take the @d trick now|pg||
mb|p|nt|granguru:  ARE WE DEFENDING OR ATTACKING?|pg||
nt|runnerup: wild one clubs never mensioned and if you guess-whitch you never do 6 clubs makes |pg||
nt|stc: 6@c are cold, double dummy|pg||
nt|runnerup: ok -it came up now|pg||
nt|granguru:  matushko did not bid 5@C but makes them appear now...|pg||
nt|granguru:  Now Bertens must decide to defend|pg||
nt|odysseus69: will South sit?? - I think no|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|roswolf: another wierd switch|pg||
pc|c2|nt|hedyg: she surely thought singleton J@H|pg||
pc|c7|nt|rcerreto: ouch!|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|cA|pg||
pc|d8|nt|jbgood: couldnt be singleton jack|pg||
nt|rcerreto: she didn't expect pd to have 4@h|pg||
pc|d3|pc|dK|nt|stc: X was giving the wining line in 6@C !!|pg||
nt|granguru:  WESTRA made a big error |pg||
nt|runnerup: south did but run him self hmm..|pg||
nt|odysseus69: intersting now|pg||
pc|d2|pg||
nt|granguru:  thinking no slam was there he doubled 6@C|pg||
nt|runnerup: north i mean the bidder|pg||
nt|josj: E should have X'd 6@H for the lead...|pg||
nt|stc: and next big error, on the way to +1 now|pg||
nt|josj: and we can see now why...|pg||
nt|odysseus69: East failed to double - which might have alerted partner to club lead|pg||
nt|granguru:  only way to beat was to lead a @C..double dummy|pg||
nt|runnerup: this makes or + 1 now|pg||
nt|stc: about 25 IMP was hanging on the lead|pg||
pc|s2|nt|rcerreto: the save proved *very* good|pg||
nt|jbgood: they play low-high as come on - and E wouldnt bid 4@s with 4 hearts?|pg||
nt|jbgood: heart J was discouraging. Period.|pg||
pc|s8|pc|sJ|nt|hedyg: now a @d|pg||
pc|sA|pg||
nt|hedyg: ok no @d :(|pg||
pc|c5|nt|rcerreto: if J can't be doubleton, then playing 2 rounds is strange|pg||
nt|hedyg: he might with 6 good @ss and 4 bad @hs|pg||
nt|rcerreto: playing upside-down...|pg||
nt|jbgood: a concentration lapse|pg||
nt|rcerreto: likely|pg||
nt|hedyg: they seem to be playing standard count|pg||
pc|c9|nt|hedyg: from what i can see|pg||
pc|c3|pc|cK|pg||
pc|d9|nt|jbgood: but like almost all Norwegians, low-hi encouraging|pg||
pc|d4|nt|rcerreto: moreover, if declarer has so many hearts, maybe you don't need a ruff to set|pg||
nt|rcerreto: either A@d or K@c should score the 3rd trick|pg||
pc|s4|pc|d6|pg||
pc|s6|nt|granguru:  but now KHolkhlov has to make the deep finesse to win|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s3|nt|odysseus69: Ace of spades maybe more sensible choice|pg||
nt|stc: -1 was 7 for EW, now 17 for NS|pg||
nt|granguru:  @SA was also an opportunity to beat...if @C were then followed.|pg||
nt|granguru:  But there was a great chance that it will be ruffed|pg||
pc|s5|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h2|pc|h5|nt|stc: After A@s @c is mandatory|pg||
pc|hA|pg||
mc|10|pg||
qx|o27|st||md|1S632H832DAT9CKQJ5,SAK5HTD7642CT9873,S84HKJ95DQJ5CA642,SQJT97HAQ764DK83C|sv|o|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
mb|1N|an| |mb|p|nt|kirp:  4@S here went down in CR, need 2 lead a trump|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
mb|p|mb|2C|mb|p|nt|bernix: will they reach 4@s after opp's open 1n (9-11???)|pg||
mb|2S|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|kirp:  this may work if N does not lead a @S|pg||
pc|s4|nt|kirp:  good lead|pg||
nt|kirp:  think he can still make it after @H finesse|pg||
nt|bernix: versace certainly didnt open 4@s in CR. this must be an error|pg||
nt|kirp:  VG lost the auction probably|pg||
nt|kirp:  win the K, finesse Q@H, A@H, ruff, ruff @C, ruff @H, ruff @C, pull last trump|pg||
nt|bernix: double dummy it's on i was thinking along the same lines|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|kirp:  then @H is good|pg||
nt|kirp:  works either with or withou a trump lead|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: so i get a message that in CR in 27th board auction was longer|pg||
nt|kirp:  so much for my quick analysis!!|pg||
pc|s7|pc|s2|nt|bernix: i had an uneasy sens of that|pg||
pc|sK|pg||
pc|hT|pc|hJ|pc|hQ|pc|h3|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: but VG in CR didn't notice this auction|pg||
nt|kirp:  so Greece should boost it lead her to 17 imps|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: so wrote 4@S for Versace :)|pg||
nt|bernix: he may still go wrong but i doubt it|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h2|nt|bernix: now he wont|pg||
pc|c3|pc|h5|pg||
pc|h4|pc|h8|pc|s5|pc|h9|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c2|pc|s9|nt|bernix: intonti's J of heats was a clever card but to no avail|pg||
pc|c5|pg||
pc|h6|nt|bernix: 10 well earned imps|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|kirp:  NS play a very weak NT, 10 hcp here|pg||
pc|d9|nt|bernix: he can even try a @d to the king for an overtrick (that doesnt materialize)|pg||
pc|sA|pc|hK|pg||
pc|d4|pc|d5|pc|dK|pc|dA|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c8|pc|c4|pc|sT|pg||
pc|d3|pc|dT|pc|d2|pc|dJ|pg||
nt|bernix: ?|pg||
mc|10|pg||
qx|c27|st||md|1S632H832DAT9CKQJ5,SAK5HTD7642CT9873,S84HKJ95DQJ5CA642,SQJT97HAQ764DK83C|sv|o|nt|roswolf: but still 2 imps to the trailing team|pg||
nt|hedyg: those 2 imps wont help them a lot|pg||
nt|hedyg: easy for us|pg||
mb|p|nt|rcerreto: as usual|pg||
nt|hedyg: J@H was not a helpful card|pg||
nt|jbgood: Easy for lady Bird too - but she had a black out|pg||
nt|jbgood: and that happens to us all|pg||
nt|hedyg: 1@c= 16+ any|pg||
mb|4S|nt|rcerreto: Yarborough in N|pg||
mb|p|nt|rcerreto: not even a 10|pg||
mb|p|nt|stc: 6@s played by E are always -2 for a loss of 8IMP|pg||
nt|hedyg: 2@c= @d?|pg||
nt|rcerreto: I think that *N* opend 1@c|pg||
nt|granguru:  was N|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: ty Simona!|pg||
nt|rcerreto: and E bid 2@d to show a major two suiter|pg||
pc|s4|nt|jbgood: dont know - perhaps @d or majors...|pg||
nt|granguru:  lol|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: sorry|pg||
nt|granguru:  final contract of course|pg||
nt|rcerreto: np|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: :( |pg||
nt|arigun: np simona|pg||
nt|rcerreto: a big thanks to our operators which are doing a great job|pg||
pc|s7|nt|rcerreto: can't believe Versace opened 1@c|pg||
nt|rcerreto: is that for real?|pg||
pc|s6|nt|vugraphpl3: hi all|pg||
nt|rcerreto: some mistake is impossible to avoid|pg||
pc|sA|pg||
pc|hT|nt|vugraphpl3: np @H|pg||
nt|rcerreto: thanks :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: now im not...|pg||
pc|hJ|nt|vugraphpl3: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrleaderb.html|pg||
nt|rcerreto: SImona?!?|pg||
nt|rcerreto: you sure?|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h2|pg||
nt|odysseus69: Queen a bad idea|pg||
nt|hedyg: next match supposed to start in 30 minutes..|pg||
nt|granguru:  yes...players usually dont care much about operating problems|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h3|nt|granguru:  Wshould have simply passed 6@C|pg||
pc|c3|nt|hedyg: really K@S?|pg||
pc|h5|pg||
pc|h6|pc|h8|pc|s5|pc|h9|pg||
nt|chilloncan: hi all:)|pg||
nt|chilloncan: welcome to cloudy poznan|pg||
pc|d4|nt|stc: and hopy on a @s lead|pg||
pc|d5|nt|stc: hope|pg||
pc|dK|pc|dA|pg||
pc|dT|nt|granguru:  they have ro be concentrated on the game|pg||
pc|d7|pc|dJ|pc|d3|pg||
nt|arigun: and normal after that much of stressful hands :) lot of slams and grands :)|pg||
pc|s8|pc|s9|nt|roswolf: hmm let through as well|pg||
pc|s2|nt|hedyg: a @s to dummy and then 10@c looked right|pg||
nt|hedyg: but he is the champ and we again see why!|pg||
pc|sK|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c2|pc|sT|pc|c5|pg||
pc|sJ|pc|s3|nt|chilloncan: Robson begins with a forcing defense, but when W shows spade cards must shift tack to establishing heart tricks while he still has a trump|pg||
pc|d6|mc|9|nt|rcerreto: I'm astonished|pg||
nt|rcerreto: Versace had 10 tricks|pg||
nt|granguru:  machine dealt hands have changed percentages|pg||
pg||
qx|o28|st||md|2ST542HAKDT5CQT542,SQ863HJ75DJ987CJ3,SKJ97HQT962D2CK98,SAH843DAKQ643CA76|sv|n|nt|bernix: typo |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|mb|3C|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: 3 boards to go|pg||
mb|3D|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: 17IMP different|pg||
mb|3H|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: is it enough to win the match? :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: we'll see :)_|pg||
mb|5D|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|hA|pc|h5|nt|kirp:  strange hand, NS have many trix in @S, EW have auction all to themselves|pg||
nt|bernix: it will go down to the wire|pg||
pc|h9|pc|h3|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h7|pc|h2|pc|h4|pg||
pc|s5|pc|s3|pc|sJ|pc|sA|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d5|pc|d7|pc|d2|pg||
nt|kirp:  looks like down 2, 2 imps to NS|pg||
pc|dK|pc|dT|pc|d8|pc|s7|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|c2|pc|d9|pc|c8|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|c28|st||md|2ST542HAKDT5CQT542,SQ863HJ75DJ987CJ3,SKJ97HQT962D2CK98,SAH843DAKQ643CA76|sv|n|nt|rcerreto: easy 4@s or 3NT in NS|pg||
nt|rcerreto: AQ of @h|pg||
nt|rcerreto: 3 ruffs in hand|pg||
nt|rcerreto: 5 @s in dummy|pg||
nt|rcerreto: = 10 tricks|pg||
nt|rcerreto: ah, right|pg||
nt|rcerreto: the lead was in trumps|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: Versace is slightly flurried|pg||
nt|rcerreto: sorry Alfredo|pg||
mb|p|nt|granguru:  It might be possible that they play the Slam Spade convention where a x asked for a @S lead..no double, no interest in a @S lead...|pg||
mb|p|mb|1D|nt|roswolf: should be a straightforward push|pg||
nt|runnerup: too easy looking game to give dutch any hope to get back imps|pg||
mb|p|nt|granguru:  The IMP magazine will be hard on himself in Westra's column next issue|pg||
mb|2D|nt|hedyg: stayman...and then i play over 2@d 4@c= 6@H+4@S, 4@D=6@S+4@H|pg||
mb|p|nt|odysseus69: can t see any chance of getting too high here|pg||
nt|arigun: only 8 tricks in 3nt event @h's are blocked for defense|pg||
mb|3N|nt|chilloncan: this is more like it:)|pg||
nt|roswolf: stayman with 6-4!?|pg||
nt|hedyg: sure! pd can have 4@hs|pg||
nt|hedyg: or you smolen and over 3NT you bid your singleton..|pg||
nt|odysseus69: 2 imps available for a diamond lead|pg||
nt|jbgood: and 4@s|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: all depending on agreements|pg||
mb|p|nt|granguru:  N can make 6@S |pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: a magical mystery tour|pg||
nt|hedyg: Michel Bessis just transferred @s and bid 4@s|pg||
nt|roswolf: indeed as would i|pg||
pc|c4|nt|runnerup: just east migth lead k @c so if you bid slam,even that makes but no probable |pg||
nt|granguru:  as E will probably lead a @C|pg||
nt|stc: good time for a psych @d cue bid|pg||
nt|hedyg: the score for bd 12 was not entered into the bridgemate at this table? it is not scored in the official score|pg||
nt|rcerreto: ho chose to play for @DA onside|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|cK|pc|c6|pg||
nt|chilloncan: easy to see why S bid 5C though a responsive double will probably gain when N has a 5-card major. The fact that E bid only 4D at favorable, though, might suggest to Robson that he ...|pg||
nt|chilloncan: would not be averse to defending 4M. meanwhile a very brisk 5C call might fetch a lucrative sacrifice, hopefully a phantom|pg||
pc|c9|nt|runnerup: perhaps no need for jokes|pg||
nt|odysseus69: 2/1 sequences seem t feature a 2NT bid on second round from responder - then an expression of his values|pg||
nt|rcerreto: winning with @s 4-1|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c2|pc|c3|pg||
pc|dA|nt|roswolf: save me from this sequence quick|pg||
nt|hedyg: Simone please can you send me 1 of those nice Lavazza boys i saw in the pictures? with an espresso!|pg||
nt|granguru:  now 5@S by S asks for a @D stopper.. pass = no, and the @D lead is obvious...|pg||
pc|d5|pc|d7|nt|chilloncan: 6S is another aggressive action, in light of already having bid 5C freely. But S could have plenty of hands for 5C that are not nearly this good for spades....three spades and a ...|pg||
nt|chilloncan: ruffing value, plus the whole club suit may come in. sometimes 13 would be easy|pg||
pc|d2|pg||
pc|dK|pc|dT|pc|d8|nt|chilloncan: for example, if EW had one more club and one fewer heart, this would make|pg||
pc|h6|pg||
pc|sA|nt|odysseus69: auction seems to be calling for diamond lead but no|pg||
pc|s2|mc|8|nt|arigun: he will try stiff @sK that is the only chance|pg||
pg||
qx|o29|st||md|3SJ3H986DK84CK7532,SQ7HQJT742DAT73C9,SAT964HAKDJ952CQ6,SK852H53DQ6CAJT84|sv|b|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|2H|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl  |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins  |pg||
nt|kirp:  looks like EW will get 2 high|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|bernix: a match-winning pass !!|pg||
pc|d5|pc|d6|pc|dK|pc|dA|pg||
pc|s7|pc|sA|pc|s2|pc|s3|pg||
pc|d2|pc|dQ|pc|d4|pc|d3|pg||
pc|s5|pc|sJ|pc|sQ|pc|s4|pg||
pc|d7|pc|d9|pc|h3|pc|d8|pg||
pc|sK|pc|h6|pc|hT|pc|s6|pg||
pc|dT|pc|dJ|pc|h5|pc|h8|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c9|pc|cQ|pc|cA|pg||
pc|s8|pc|h9|pc|hJ|pc|s9|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|c29|st||md|3SJ3H986DK84CK7532,SQ7HQJT742DAT73C9,SAT964HAKDJ952CQ6,SK852H53DQ6CAJT84|sv|b|nt|chilloncan: 1N-3N awaits|pg||
nt|odysseus69: my limited understanding gives me the impression that 2NT is often like 4th suit forcing only at a lower level|pg||
nt|hedyg: last 2 boards|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: next sesion 18.45|pg||
nt|granguru:  who remembers  the bidding sequence made on b 27?|pg||
nt|granguru:  P P 1@C ?|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|nt|rcerreto: another mini-notrump|pg||
nt|rcerreto: this time EW will have less problem getting to game|pg||
mb|1N|nt|granguru:  score of hand 10 is wrong hand is not played yet|pg||
nt|hedyg: micro?|pg||
mb|2H|nt|rcerreto: 2@D by E|pg||
nt|rcerreto: then... don't know|pg||
nt|arigun: 3@c by south :)|pg||
mb|p|mb|2N|mb|p|nt|roswolf: the more i see it a gambling 3nt in a minoe hasnt much to recommend it -now showing a major is a different matter|pg||
nt|hedyg: ok thanks Simona|pg||
nt|jbgood: 8-12 i belive|pg||
nt|arigun: and 4@s by V i guess|pg||
nt|granguru:  P P 1@C 2@D; 3@c X P 4@C; p 4@S|pg||
mb|3D|nt|chilloncan: 9 trix await|pg||
nt|chilloncan: since E has only 2 diamonds|pg||
nt|runnerup: ..3nt ..so nothing special|pg||
mb|p|mb|3H|mb|p|nt|hedyg: gambling, not promising those outside queens|pg||
mb|p|nt|chilloncan: oops a snag there. was expecting spade ace to block the suit|pg||
mb|p|pc|cQ|pc|cA|nt|odysseus69: same contract different route|pg||
pc|c2|nt|runnerup: so 1 more imp for a good lead|pg||
nt|odysseus69: this type of laydown usually takes a long time with increasing delays from about 4th club on|pg||
pc|c9|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|c7|pc|d3|pc|c6|pg||
nt|odysseus69: dummy q|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h6|nt|hedyg: wrongsided 3NT...but normal|pg||
pc|hT|pc|hK|pg||
nt|roswolf: prefer to play in 6/7@D|pg||
pc|s4|nt|hedyg: you cant LOL|pg||
pc|s2|pc|sJ|pc|sQ|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|hA|pc|h5|pc|h8|pg||
nt|arigun: nicely played |pg||
nt|rcerreto: still -1|pg||
pc|sA|nt|rcerreto: after A@s and @s|pg||
pc|s5|pc|s3|pc|s7|pg||
pc|sT|nt|arigun: yes nicely defended :)|pg||
pc|sK|nt|chilloncan: sorry all, dodgy connection here|pg||
pc|h9|pc|hJ|pg||
pc|d7|pc|d2|pc|dQ|pc|dK|pg||
pc|cK|mc|8|pg||
qx|o30|st||md|4SAT52HJ7DQT32CT64,SKJ63HT43D65CKQ98,S98HAQ986DAKJ84C2,SQ74HK52D97CAJ753|sv|o|nt|kirp:  match is a rout now|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: last board :)|pg||
nt|bernix: NS can only limit the damage if they manage to bid and make 4@h|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: I invite you for tomorrow :)|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: the next round should begin at 10AM|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|nt|bernix: i have a round of golf tomorrow|pg||
mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|nt|kirp:  5@Ds can be made, if no @S lead|pg||
mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
pc|s4|nt|bernix: in 4@h he must guess trumps correctly|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s8|pg||
nt|kirp:  % play would be to finesse twice|pg||
nt|kirp:  in @Hs|pg||
pc|hJ|nt|bernix: @s lead a little displeasing. he would have liked to start with a small heart to the jack|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h6|pc|hK|pg||
pc|s7|pc|s2|pc|sK|pc|s9|pg||
pc|s6|nt|kirp:  Cant really go down|pg||
nt|kirp:  so thx all, ttfn|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
pc|h8|pc|sQ|pc|s5|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h2|pc|h7|pc|h4|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h5|pc|c4|pc|hT|pg||
mc|10|nt|bernix: thanks all for watching. swiss continues tommorrow at 10|pg||
nt|bernix: thanks maria|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: so thank you all :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: and I invite you fo tomorrow :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bye :)|pg||
pg||
qx|c30|st||md|4SAT52HJ7DQT32CT64,SKJ63HT43D65CKQ98,S98HAQ986DAKJ84C2,SQ74HK52D97CAJ753|sv|o|nt|chilloncan: while away i reconsidered my analysis. i think now that the percentages are in fact in favor of Allfrey's playing small from dummy at trick one|pg||
nt|roswolf: :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: last board of this match now|pg||
nt|odysseus69: time saver - thank you Westra|pg||
nt|hedyg: last board now|pg||
nt|hedyg: thanks to our outstanding operator in Poznan, Simona!to my excellent fellow commentators Jon and Rodolfo for donating their time and expertise to guide us through these boards.our ...|pg||
nt|hedyg: appreciation to the EBL and the PBF for bringing this event to BBO, especially Slawek Latala  who was intrumental in organizing these broadcasts on behalf of BBO|pg||
nt|arigun: wd by south, i think he would make if @cJ was covered by K|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: thanks to our outstanding operator in Poznan, Simona!to my excellent fellow commentators Geoffrey and Murat for donating their time and expertise to guide us through these ...|pg||
nt|hedyg: boards.our appreciation to the EBL and the PBF for bringing this event to BBO, especially Slawek Latala  who was intrumental in organizing these broadcasts on behalf of BBO|pg||
nt|hedyg: special thanks to our specs for joining and for your kind and helpful comments,we hope you enjoyed the show|pg||
nt|hedyg: special thanks to our specs for joining and for your kind and helpful comments,we hope you enjoyed the show|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|chilloncan: haste makes waste:)|pg||
nt|hedyg: we will be back for the last round of the RR in 32 minutes|pg||
nt|jbgood: 1 nt= 5+ @c and positive|pg||
mb|1H|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl3: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrleaderb.html|pg||
nt|hedyg: we will be back at 18 45 CET, in 30 minutes|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|nt|hedyg: 1@c any 17+|pg||
mb|2D|nt|hedyg: 1NT= 8+, 5+ @cs|pg||
mb|p|nt|rcerreto: 5@d is a nice contract which can be set|pg||
mb|3D|nt|hedyg: 3NT looks right with the W hand|pg||
nt|roswolf: IF an early heart switch the contract should go down|pg||
nt|rcerreto: 4@h is awfull but it makes|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: good point hedy|pg||
nt|hedyg: is this early enough?|pg||
nt|roswolf: :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: Bessis in 3@HX in the OR|pg||
nt|odysseus69: switch n/s and they have an overtrick|pg||
nt|runnerup: tx all -last looks like a bit too ambitious 4 hearts but can happen here also|pg||
nt|arigun: 11 trick in @d since @hK is off side and there is no complex squeeze etc|pg||
mb|4D|nt|hedyg: 2@c relay i assume|pg||
nt|jbgood: since they play 1 NT 12-15, they have to open 1@c on 16|pg||
nt|rcerreto: they are in a game forcing situation|pg||
mb|p|nt|chilloncan: why is the team name "skwark"? Allfrey-Robson play on the Allfrey team|pg||
nt|jbgood: ace is good now|pg||
nt|rcerreto: normal lead but @d would have worked better|pg||
nt|hedyg: 2@S? controls or natural?|pg||
nt|rcerreto: if defense open @S 5@d is -1|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|odysseus69: well judged all round|pg||
nt|chilloncan: hi victor:)|pg||
pc|cA|nt|rcerreto: natural, maybe|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c8|nt|hedyg: i thought they show controls 2nd bid|pg||
nt|jbgood: 5 clubs and 4 spades|pg||
pc|c2|pg||
nt|odysseus69: spade spade defeats 4H|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c6|nt|hedyg: he was saving his father from 3@C X|pg||
pc|cK|pc|d4|pg||
nt|chilloncan: on  19 N got a reprieve when W shifted to a D. then N had to decide who had the club ace|pg||
nt|runnerup: so Lazy goes on as a winner and dutch drops out |pg||
nt|odysseus69: thx all - had a little excitement|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d7|pc|d2|nt|hedyg: E did not open there|pg||
pc|d5|pg||
pc|d8|nt|hedyg: cannot be controls|pg||
pc|d9|pc|dT|pc|d6|pg||
nt|hedyg: p-3@C-p-p-X-p-p3@H-p-p-X|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: thx everyone|pg||
pc|hJ|pc|h3|pc|h6|nt|rcerreto: ducking the lead wasn't the better choice|pg||
pc|hK|pg||
mc|11|nt|jbgood: gave away tempo|pg||
nt|rcerreto: yes|pg||
nt|rcerreto: he escaped the @d lead|pg||
nt|rcerreto: well, it's over|pg||
nt|rcerreto: thank everybody|pg||
nt|rcerreto: bye!!|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: thanks all bye!!|pg||
nt|arigun: thanks all, especialy our brilliant operator Simona|pg||
pg||