vg|D EC 2011 Open Teams Swiss _,1_7,I,11,20,Angelini Team,0,Kanin,0|
rs|4HW-2,2HE+3,3CN+2,5HWx-2,2HS-1,2HS=,6HS-1,6HS-1,4SW=,4SW+1,6DNx-1,5SE=,3NE=,4SW=,4SN+1,4SN+1,4SW=,4SW+1,4SE-1,3NE-1|
pn|Greco,Hoiland,Hampson,Kvangraven,FUGLESTAD,BROGELAND,BREKKA,ANGELINI|pg||
qx|o11|st||md|1SK53HQT6DKQT73CT8,ST874HK97432DJCAQ,SQJ96HA8D98654C92,SA2HJ5DA2CKJ76543|sv|o|nt|vugraphpl2: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|santyclz: There are currently 8 vg tables running, to watch multiple tables:  www.bridgebase.com/mobile  Open 1 browser window/table.|pg||
mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|2C|an| |mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|3C|nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
mb|p|mb|3H|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sQ|nt|santyclz: Touch and go 4@h here.  The @s lead probably beats it.|pg||
nt|snorre: 3NT a bit easier to play..   :)|pg||
nt|santyclz: My kind of 3nt, 9 top tricks.|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s4|pg||
pc|h5|pc|h6|pc|hK|pc|hA|pg||
pc|s6|pc|s2|pc|sK|pc|s7|pg||
pc|hQ|nt|santyclz: The defense isn't cutting them any slack.|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h8|pc|hJ|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
pc|s5|pc|s8|pc|s9|pc|c3|pg||
pc|d6|pc|dA|pc|d3|pc|dJ|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c8|pc|cA|pc|c2|pg||
pc|h9|pc|d4|pc|c5|pc|hT|pg||
nt|santyclz: Now he gets out for -2.|pg||
mc|8|pg||
qx|c11|st||md|1SK53HQT6DKQT73CT8,ST874HK97432DJCAQ,SQJ96HA8D98654C92,SA2HJ5DA2CKJ76543|sv|o|nt|hedyg: voila!|pg||
nt|hedyg: i will get their CC|pg||
nt|roswolf: wildish bd to start with|pg||
nt|hedyg: afraid i have no CC for NS. lets assume Polish @c ?|pg||
nt|roswolf: blacks v reds|pg||
nt|roswolf: ok hedy|pg||
nt|jbgood: ...and with 2 honors:)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: enjoy :)|pg||
mb|1N!|an| |mb|2D|an| |mb|p|nt|grebrof: mini-nt from S|pg||
nt|rcerreto: 2@d = one major?|pg||
nt|grebrof: I think 8-12 or something 1st seat nonvul 1st/2nt favourable|pg||
nt|jbgood: and 3 NT on for EW|pg||
mb|2H|an| |nt|hedyg: Angelini's own version of strong @c: http://www.ecatsbridge.org/documents/files/ConventionCards/2008Pau-european/OpenTeams/Italy/angelini-sementa.pdf|pg||
nt|grebrof: 2@d porbably one major|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: 3@C should show spade tolerance|pg||
nt|hedyg: EW CC: http://www.ecatsbridge.org/documents/files/ConventionCards/2010Ostend-european/OpenTeams/germany/piekarek-smirnov.pdf|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: strong @c system|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: now south has not got much to guide him|pg||
nt|grebrof: 2nd...|pg||
pc|dK|nt|hedyg: yes Geoffrey agree with 3 @c|pg||
nt|rcerreto: 2@h (pass or correct) was a little pessimistic maybe|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|d9|nt|roswolf: a good bd for the german pair|pg||
pc|dA|pg||
nt|hedyg: yes they are playing 2@c= majors, 2@d= 1 M, 2@H/S nat +minor|pg||
nt|jbgood: often called multilandy|pg||
pc|h5|nt|hedyg: well they play X= hcps which is not multilandy, thats why i didnt call it by a name|pg||
pc|h6|nt|MolvaM: 4s could have played quite nicely|pg||
nt|hedyg: no more ruffs of @d|pg||
nt|odysseus69: good afternoon all = welcome to the last of 7 round robin with 3 from 8 teams qualifying for Swiss A|pg||
nt|runnerup: hi all -ew leading his group|pg||
nt|odysseus69: bidding does not appear to match the hands|pg||
nt|stc: hi|pg||
nt|grebrof: and now J of @h? - here, just play trumps - need only 8 tricks|pg||
pc|h9|nt|stc: sometthing is fishy here :)|pg||
nt|odysseus69: had problems in round 5 with wrong hands- maybe same again|pg||
nt|odysseus69: at least South has the 4 of diamonds|pg||
pc|hA|pg||
nt|odysseus69: Roland will sort it out|pg||
pc|d5|pc|d2|pc|d7|pc|h2|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h8|pc|hJ|nt|jbgood: spade might have worked better|pg||
pc|hQ|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|h4|pc|d4|pc|c3|pg||
nt|jbgood: instead of a di return|pg||
pc|hK|pc|c9|pc|s2|pc|hT|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c2|pc|c4|pc|c8|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|d6|pc|cK|pc|cT|pg||
nt|grebrof: more optimism at the other table|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|d3|pc|s4|pc|d8|pg||
nt|hedyg: in OR there was no mini NT and W opened 1@H|pg||
pc|c7|nt|rcerreto: but in the wrong denomination|pg||
pc|s3|pc|s7|pc|s6|pg||
nt|hedyg: @s was never bid|pg||
mc|11|nt|jbgood: not sure about the optimism when you can put down 9 tops in NT|pg||
nt|rcerreto: first 7 imps to Angelini then|pg||
nt|hedyg: Brogeland not expecting imps for 2@H|pg||
pg||
qx|o12|st||md|2SA542H72DQ543CQJ6,ST63HAKJT6D97CT83,S987H9DAKJCAK9742,SKQJHQ8543DT862C5|sv|n|nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl  |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
mb|p|nt|santyclz: Needed a @d lead, a @h to the 9 and no @s switch.  Not very likely.|pg||
mb|2C|an| |mb|p|mb|2D|an| |mb|p|mb|2S|an| |mb|p|mb|3C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sK|pc|sA|pc|s6|pc|s7|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|c3|pc|c2|pc|c5|pg||
pc|c6|pc|c8|pc|cA|pc|h3|pg||
pc|cK|pc|h5|pc|cJ|pc|cT|pg||
pc|c7|pc|h4|pc|h2|pc|h6|pg||
pc|c9|pc|d6|pc|h7|pc|d7|pg||
pc|c4|pc|d2|nt|santyclz: In the other room in 2@h they got a @d lead, led a @h to the 9 and ended up making 5.|pg||
mc|11|nt|santyclz: To see how a board was played at the other table with the download version, click "Movie", then "(other) Room",|pg||
nt|santyclz: click on the board you wish to review, and click “Next” to step through the play. With the Browser version tit |pg||
pg||
qx|c12|st||md|2SA542H72DQ543CQJ6,ST63HAKJT6D97CT83,S987H9DAKJCAK9742,SKQJHQ8543DT862C5|sv|n|nt|MolvaM: and could bring the advantage of pushing opps to 5@h|pg||
nt|hedyg: on an A@S lead N could have played K@S and then..............the result would be -2|pg||
nt|jbgood: 5@c excellent here|pg||
nt|rcerreto: careful defense needed to set 5@c|pg||
mb|2H|nt|hedyg: K@S preferential for @D of course|pg||
nt|roswolf: a trappy bd for n/s|pg||
nt|roswolf: too easy to play in 3nt|pg||
nt|hedyg: 5@H -2 as well|pg||
mb|3C|mb|4H|nt|odysseus69: they played board 10|pg||
nt|odysseus69: this loks very dubious too|pg||
nt|rcerreto: a @s lead shouldn't be difficult to find|pg||
mb|d|an| |nt|runnerup: very weak opening or problems here also|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: which may well make with the diamonds 3-3|pg||
nt|Walddk1: Patience please|pg||
nt|Walddk1: Operator catching up'|pg||
nt|Walddk1: They started with board 10 here for some reason|pg||
nt|Walddk1: We think the operator redealt to the werong board|pg||
nt|Walddk1: but that everything is OK now|pg||
nt|odysseus69: got the right players in the right seats - all we need is the right cards- we are patient tolerant sympathetic and understanding|pg||
nt|rcerreto: then, blockage in @d sets|pg||
mb|5C|nt|hedyg: Angelini is on lead with KQJ@S, he should find the lead|pg||
nt|rcerreto: Angelini might be thinking to bid 5|pg||
nt|jbgood: not over yet...|pg||
nt|hedyg: he has a double with those @ss?|pg||
mb|5H|nt|hedyg: EW are by some considered to now be the best European pair|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|roswolf: certainly they have some fine results in their locker:)|pg||
nt|jbgood: no Hedy|pg||
nt|hedyg: no you are right ofc|pg||
mb|d|nt|hedyg: 5@H is insurance|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: they sure do|pg||
nt|roswolf: might take the heart finesse first|pg||
nt|hedyg: i am having problems connecting to BBO Mobile, is it only me?|pg||
nt|MolvaM: everything works|pg||
nt|hedyg: or better, problems connecting to a table|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: ok :(|pg||
mb|p|nt|rcerreto: a cheap save, too bad it's a phantom|pg||
nt|hedyg: N might have void in @H|pg||
pc|dK|nt|Walddk1: West's name is   Westra|pg||
nt|Walddk1: North's is  Matushko|pg||
nt|Walddk1: East and West are correct|pg||
nt|Walddk1: N-S are from Russia|pg||
nt|odysseus69: doesnt look like way to play 3NT|pg||
nt|odysseus69: guess the contract is a new test|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: auction is wrong... but contract is good|pg||
nt|odysseus69: not that 3NT is a likely spot - 4C possibly but then why heart king|pg||
nt|runnerup: good -but not makeable |pg||
pc|d2|nt|MolvaM: even clubs|pg||
nt|odysseus69: probably trick 2 was losing club finesse|pg||
pc|d5|pc|d7|pg||
nt|toral5: hello all|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c5|pc|cQ|pc|c3|pg||
nt|roswolf: strange looking line|pg||
pc|s7|pc|sJ|nt|MolvaM: combine chances in the minors and avoid the@h finesse|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s3|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d9|pc|dJ|pc|d6|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|o13|st||md|3S5HAK983DQ7643C75,SQJ984HQT72DA95C8,SAT732HJDJTCAQJT2,SK6H654DK82CK9643|sv|b|nt|santyclz: “Other Table”, click on the board and use the single arrow in the bottom right to step through.|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|mb|1N|an| |mb|p|mb|2C|an| |nt|santyclz: (pardon the finger-checks...)|pg||
mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
mb|2H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl  |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins |pg||
pc|s4|pc|sA|pc|s6|pc|s5|pg||
nt|toral5: hello all|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: hi :)|pg||
nt|santyclz: Another tricky contract and once again, the @s lead gives the defenders the best chance to beat it.  I must confess I would have led the @sq which would have allowed a make.|pg||
nt|toral5: where do we find the current scores?|pg||
nt|santyclz: Namaste Sapan.|pg||
nt|toral5: hello santy:)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswT1.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|santyclz: The key for this session seems to be "lead @ss."|pg||
pc|s2|pc|sK|pc|h3|pc|s9|pg||
nt|toral5: declarer will lead a @D|pg||
nt|toral5: plan will be to hook @C and ruff out as many @S as possible|pg||
nt|toral5: but as the cards lie,its in vain|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d5|pc|dT|pc|dK|pg||
pc|h5|nt|toral5: nice @D king|pg||
nt|toral5: oh.i m sorry.thought he played @D from dummy:(|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h2|pc|hJ|pg||
pc|d6|pc|dA|pc|dJ|pc|d2|pg||
nt|toral5: east can enjoy a @D ruff\|pg||
nt|toral5: on the return of @S q|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|toral5: greco surely in trouble|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule  |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
pc|s8|pc|sT|pc|h6|pc|h8|pg||
nt|santyclz: Lost a tempo which may allow the contract to make.|pg||
nt|toral5: i did not like the low @S play at all|pg||
pc|c5|pc|c8|nt|santyclz: @c to the ace does it.|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|cK|pg||
nt|toral5: now down |pg||
nt|toral5: @C ace @S ruff and trump q wd have sailed him home|pg||
nt|santyclz: Had to win  the @c and ruff another @s.|pg||
pc|c9|pc|c7|nt|santyclz: He played the 50% finesse rather than the @d3-3.|pg||
nt|santyclz: Although since w showed up with 5@ss, the finesse wasn't 50% any more.|pg||
pc|h7|pc|c2|pg||
pc|sJ|pc|s3|nt|toral5: had @D been not 3-3 wd west not given a @D ruff instead of @S play?|pg||
pc|h4|pc|h9|pg||
pc|hK|pc|hT|pc|cT|pc|c3|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d9|pc|s7|pc|d8|pg||
nt|santyclz: Assuming w had the long @ds, yes.|pg||
pc|d7|nt|toral5: a pik up for kalin|pg||
nt|toral5: ...|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|cJ|pc|c4|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|cA|pc|c6|pc|d4|pg||
pg||
qx|c13|st||md|3S5HAK983DQ7643C75,SQJ984HQT72DA95C8,SAT732HJDJTCAQJT2,SK6H654DK82CK9643|sv|b|nt|odysseus69: 3rd time lucky?|pg||
nt|stc: Flat 3NT because of friendly @ds|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|nt|hedyg: 15 imps is huge in 10 board matches|pg||
nt|hedyg: you can practically say the match is over except for a miracle|pg||
nt|jbgood: Fugleastad must be diciplined not to get too high here|pg||
mb|1N|nt|MolvaM: on the positve side, they have 9 boards to recover|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: while the opps twiddle their thumbs?|pg||
mb|2C|nt|jbgood: and she is|pg||
mb|p|nt|stc: even 4@h would make|pg||
nt|odysseus69: mini NT is at least credible and Syayman looks OK so on track now|pg||
nt|runnerup: destany was 4 down some misfif and 10+10  |pg||
nt|odysseus69: 3NT from North will confirm all is well|pg||
mb|2H|mb|p|nt|odysseus69: 3NT from South if 3D suggested diamonds + 4 spades|pg||
nt|rcerreto: this hand would be scary if playing "Gazzilli"|pg||
nt|jbgood: 2@d more flexible?|pg||
nt|hedyg: it is scary anyhow|pg||
nt|hedyg: surely 2@d denies 5+@hs|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|MolvaM: well, its a difficult life being a positivist :)|pg||
nt|rcerreto: but @h are stronger, moreover if you get raised you'd be happy|pg||
pc|s9|nt|roswolf: well north did bid 3@C over 2@H led to 5@CX=|pg||
nt|rcerreto: I like better 2@h|pg||
nt|jbgood: i like it better too:)|pg||
pc|sA|nt|runnerup: 3nt +1 is my guess|pg||
nt|odysseus69: some communication problems- expect a club lead|pg||
nt|stc: good defense may keep dec in 9 tricks|pg||
nt|jbgood: better than 2@s anyhow:)|pg||
pc|s6|nt|stc: just because the communication problems dec has no choice but @ds|pg||
nt|odysseus69: we can see 3-3 diamonds - declarer cant and will be a little nervous about cashing club ace|pg||
nt|stc: no need to cash the A@c, play all @d then AK@h and @H|pg||
nt|runnerup: i think also that 3 @d doent promice spades,just diamonds and forcing,because yu cant force otherways with only 5 cards|pg||
nt|odysseus69: ok as cards lie - everthing is ok- but if hearts 4-2 then danger of losing 2 hearts and 3 spades- |pg||
nt|odysseus69: however I agree that he shouldnt cash club ace|pg||
nt|stc: there is no danger to loose 2@h and 3@h because defenders has no communications|pg||
nt|runnerup: 26 was not enought to bid game in other table -so leaders will win this board -bacauce 9 at least here|pg||
nt|stc: 2@h and 3@s I mean|pg||
pc|s5|pg||
nt|hedyg: lol|pg||
pc|hJ|pc|h6|nt|odysseus69: right -no danger when diamonds 3-3 |pg||
nt|jbgood: but difficult to make|pg||
pc|h3|pc|hQ|pg||
nt|rcerreto: 2@s is where "gazzilli" would have likely landed you|pg||
pc|s4|pc|s2|nt|stc: and with @d 4-2 he needs 3@h tricks and K@s on side|pg||
pc|sK|pc|h8|pg||
nt|roswolf: team bessis have 9 more boards to score more is more likely:)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: he played a bit too quickly|pg||
nt|stc: wrong, only K@s on side|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c8|pc|cQ|pc|cK|pg||
nt|MolvaM: diamonds are usually 4-3 but today they are 5-2|pg||
pc|c3|nt|runnerup: he must trust  @d 3-3 anyway|pg||
pc|c5|nt|granguru:  hi all|pg||
pc|h2|pc|c2|pg||
nt|roswolf: west doesnt have a trump to return|pg||
nt|hedyg: he can ruff 1|pg||
pc|d5|nt|hedyg: ooooooops|pg||
nt|MolvaM: not if smirnov played a spade|pg||
nt|hedyg: ruffing 1@d is security!|pg||
pc|dT|nt|odysseus69: now he has to cash|pg||
pc|dK|pc|d3|pg||
nt|roswolf: another strange line|pg||
nt|MolvaM: roller coaster|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d4|nt|runnerup: it is not nice to play but wins |pg||
nt|stc: cash and prey |pg||
pc|dA|pc|dJ|pg||
nt|jbgood: E found the defense:)|pg||
pc|d9|pc|s3|pc|d8|nt|hedyg: could ruff 1 @d and claim 10 tricks|pg||
pc|dQ|pg||
nt|MolvaM: each side presenting the contract to the other side|pg||
nt|roswolf: indeed - maybe nerves|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h7|pc|s7|nt|odysseus69: and all is well with the world|pg||
pc|h4|pg||
pc|hK|pc|hT|mc|8|nt|hedyg: surely pd would have led @c with a singleton...|pg||
pg||
qx|o14|st||md|4SQ3HAKJ32DQT843C5,SJT2H97DK95CQ9862,SAK98HQ865DJ7CAKT,S7654HT4DA62CJ743|sv|o|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|santyclz: Everybody's 4@h...|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: we have intervention of Td, due to last round....|pg||
mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|nt|toral5: a dull 4h for us|pg||
nt|toral5: but lot of bidding for sure:)|pg||
mb|2N|mb|p|nt|toral5: @S j10 coming down STILL 6 not making:)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: ok, now we can play :)|pg||
nt|toral5: no place to park those @D|pg||
nt|toral5: jacoby or limit or better in @H?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
nt|toral5: oh my god.other room bid and made 6:(|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|toral5: ahhh.correction.1 down:)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins |pg||
nt|santyclz: Whew, the world is spinning properly again...|pg||
mb|3C|mb|p|nt|toral5: so many top pairs play natural responses on jacoby 2nt|pg||
mb|3D|mb|p|mb|3N|nt|toral5: 3@D=relay(range inquiry)|pg||
mb|p|nt|toral5: a lot of refinement in jacoby|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|santyclz: So many changes I wonder if it's still Jacoby.|pg||
mb|4C|mb|p|nt|toral5: no 4@D cue from south means no slam for them|pg||
nt|toral5: how many matches on bbo 2nite?|pg||
nt|santyclz: Unfortunately we can't see the closed room bidding because the score had to be corrected.|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: 4matches :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: 8 table :)|pg||
mb|4D|mb|p|mb|4H|nt|santyclz: I suspect the 4@d was alerted...|pg||
nt|toral5: i mean how many more matches 2nite aftr this?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|santyclz: 1 more|pg||
nt|toral5: ok|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: :)|pg||
nt|santyclz: Starts about 45 min from now.|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
mb|p|mb|5H|mb|p|nt|santyclz: Uh oh.  |pg||
mb|6H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: the same in the closed room :)|pg||
nt|toral5: ouch|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|santyclz: One would think that at this level this type of disaster would be rare rather than duplicated.|pg||
pc|c2|nt|toral5: exactly|pg||
nt|toral5: irony of this hand is no @D lead,@S j10 falling,still no discard|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c3|pc|c5|pg||
nt|santyclz: Needs the qj- of @cs as well.|pg||
nt|toral5: i thought he ll insert @C 10 hopeing for every possible miracle|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c4|pc|d3|pc|c6|pg||
pc|cT|pc|c7|pc|h2|pc|c8|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h7|pc|h5|pc|h4|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h9|pc|h6|pc|hT|pg||
nt|toral5: now will try for @D honour stiff after elimination|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s2|pc|s8|pc|s4|pg||
pc|s3|pc|sT|pc|sA|pc|s5|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s6|pc|d4|pc|sJ|pg||
pc|s9|pc|s7|pc|d8|nt|toral5: west will be screaming after seeing discards:)|pg||
pc|d5|pg||
mc|11|nt|toral5: but he doesnt know the value of those immaterial discards:)|pg||
pg||
qx|c14|st||md|4SQ3HAKJ32DQT843C5,SJT2H97DK95CQ9862,SAK98HQ865DJ7CAKT,S7654HT4DA62CJ743|sv|o|nt|hedyg: thuse he does not have 1|pg||
nt|hedyg: thus*|pg||
mb|p|nt|granguru:  NS are beating the 1993 world champions|pg||
nt|hedyg: the ruff was a coincidence|pg||
mb|1H|mb|p|nt|stc: how many teams qualify for the Swiss A phase ?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: 3 :)|pg||
nt|odysseus69: unusual to pass on South as in OR |pg||
nt|runnerup: ew has board this qwuite cheap--ns has 8-9 in majors |pg||
nt|odysseus69: most moderns bid 1S but maybe playing strong club|pg||
mb|2N|an| |nt|granguru:  well in fact a kib rectifies me ..only westra was on that team|pg||
nt|stc: great result for EW in OR|pg||
mb|p|nt|granguru:  Muller also a memeber is playing in the winning Netherlands red team|pg||
mb|3D|nt|hedyg: yes but he must have though E has A@D not A@S!!|pg||
nt|hedyg: since S did not try a @d finesse nor to ruff out K@D|pg||
nt|MolvaM: but whouldnt declarer have started the diamonds right away?|pg||
nt|hedyg: so why did he play small to the J?|pg||
nt|MolvaM: anyway. its history now and bessis got another 12|pg||
nt|hedyg: it was only obvious to us who saw all cards i think|pg||
nt|MolvaM: right hedy :)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: 3@c trial?|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes the play is so important at this level -you must take care in all contracts|pg||
mb|p|mb|4N|nt|roswolf: seems obvious|pg||
nt|granguru:  at the time they were the youngest team ever to win a BB|pg||
nt|stc: NS may cash the first 10 tricks here !!|pg||
nt|odysseus69: spade lead works well|pg||
nt|rcerreto: lack of control in @d should keep away from slam|pg||
nt|rcerreto: maybe not|pg||
nt|hedyg: how will they know?|pg||
mb|p|mb|5H|nt|jbgood: difficult to pass 4 NT:)|pg||
mb|p|nt|runnerup: tis is 4- some down -is s! out|pg||
mb|6H|nt|MolvaM: on the positive side there are 7 more boards to play :)|pg||
nt|stc: petit appel :)|pg||
nt|odysseus69: 2 down |pg||
nt|stc: but sry, only 8 tricks|pg||
nt|runnerup: can he see it ?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrleaderb.html|pg||
nt|hedyg: difficult to know S does not have KQ@D|pg||
nt|rcerreto: even with the friendly @s layout...|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: well showing his shortage(if he could)may have worked better|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: the E hand is limited by not opening 1@c (16+)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: but Kx in trial suit is a nice holding no?|pg||
nt|hedyg: you want to be in game opposite max 15?|pg||
nt|stc: if left alone, dec can make max 6 tricks, still -1|pg||
mb|p|nt|odysseus69: his partner did encourage I assume - |pg||
pc|c2|nt|runnerup: no but still down 1 |pg||
nt|rcerreto: you're still short|pg||
nt|rcerreto: aren't you?|pg||
nt|hedyg: better to show short on 2NT, then N knows AK@C are wasted values|pg||
nt|jbgood: a cue bid sequence may find a lack of di controls... this was too hasty by Kaninen|pg||
mc|13|nt|rcerreto: come on!!!|pg||
pg||
qx|o15|st||md|1SJ87HK654DT94CAT5,SAQT542HQJDKCKQ93,SK6H8732DQJ72C876,S93HAT9DA8653CJ42|sv|n|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2C|mb|p|mb|2D|an| |mb|p|mb|2S|an| |mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|toral5: can declarer go down on a @H lead and trump misguess?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
pc|dQ|nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|santyclz: Not on a @d lead.|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
nt|toral5: without @H lead declarer is at liberty to play @S ace and than lead a low @S from dummy|pg||
pc|d3|pc|dT|pc|dK|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c8|pc|cJ|pc|cA|pg||
nt|toral5: do u like this play?|pg||
pc|c5|pc|cK|pc|c6|pc|c2|pg||
nt|toral5: seems he is playing for @C 3-3|pg||
nt|toral5: or 10x|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h2|pc|hA|pc|h4|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d4|pc|hJ|pc|d2|pg||
pc|s3|pc|s7|pc|sQ|pc|sK|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c4|pc|cT|pc|cQ|pg||
mc|10|pg||
qx|c15|st||md|1SJ87HK654DT94CAT5,SAQT542HQJDKCKQ93,SK6H8732DQJ72C876,S93HAT9DA8653CJ42|sv|n|nt|odysseus69: didnt get chance to take|pg||
nt|hedyg: Simona?|pg||
nt|hedyg: are you sure of the result?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: its now ok?! |pg||
nt|jbgood: down 1 registered|pg||
nt|rcerreto: ok|pg||
nt|hedyg: ok now yes, ty|pg||
mb|p|mb|1C|nt|MolvaM: results page http://www.poznan2011.pl/results|pg||
nt|roswolf: that 2@H SEEMS TO BE A 1 SUITER|pg||
nt|roswolf: needs a 2 suited overcall|pg||
nt|MolvaM: 3nt and 5@d are ok|pg||
mb|p|nt|chilloncan: very aggressive reopening double there, at all green and facing a PH. risk-reward ratio not obviously in favor of action|pg||
nt|roswolf: a firm 3@D followed by a firmer 3nt!?|pg||
mb|2D|nt|rcerreto: after all, there was a tiny chance that she didn't appear to have tested|pg||
nt|jbgood: 8-12 balanced|pg||
nt|jbgood: 2@d|pg||
nt|rcerreto: with @s behaving, one stiff honour in @d would have allowed to make|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: even if for t/o dont like dbl|pg||
mb|4S|nt|odysseus69: looks a flattie|pg||
nt|rcerreto: after elimination|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|MolvaM: what would happen if smirnov could bid 4@h? would olech bid 4@s?|pg||
nt|roswolf: we will never know|pg||
nt|stc: slam is not good but decent here|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: n/s will miss 3nt|pg||
nt|MolvaM: maybe olech should have bid 3NT now|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes i think so|pg||
nt|hedyg: Piek wont let them play anyhow|pg||
nt|MolvaM: so difficult for south to bid it from his side|pg||
nt|granguru:  Bubbo de Boer, westra, Leufkens, Peter jansen, Westerdorf, Muller, Jaap trounborst were the boys|pg||
nt|rcerreto: but it wasn't the case here|pg||
pc|dQ|nt|roswolf: may try 3@S -YUK!?|pg||
nt|hedyg: and Smirnov will..........pass|pg||
nt|roswolf: WELL PROBABLY BUT EAST MAY THEN TRY A T/O DBL!?:)|pg||
nt|hedyg: imo when opps want to play in your 6 card suit you should let them :p|pg||
nt|roswolf: south knows he is being mugged but ...........|pg||
nt|hedyg: that independant caps key again Geoff?|pg||
nt|MolvaM: both N/S players created problems and now its a guess if they can reach a makable game|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes it has a life of its own:)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: or the devil made you do it? :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: lol|pg||
nt|roswolf: :)|pg||
nt|roswolf: south hopefully will bid soon|pg||
nt|odysseus69: a fraction better than spade finesse|pg||
nt|stc: slam needs K@s + @s 2-2 or some sort of friendly @c, about 40% I guess|pg||
nt|hedyg: running scores: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|jbgood: can even afford 2 trump losers now since clubs behave|pg||
nt|rcerreto: several alternatives to evaluate|pg||
nt|rcerreto: we can see that any sensible line of play wins|pg||
pc|d3|nt|hedyg: would you start with A@S?|pg||
nt|rcerreto: but he has to think|pg||
nt|rcerreto: I wouldn't but it could be right|pg||
nt|jbgood: @s ace and a small one is surely an alternative|pg||
nt|hedyg: ace in any case and think some more :p|pg||
nt|jbgood: but so many other ways|pg||
pc|d4|nt|MolvaM: hands must be bid on the same day that they were dealt :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: so much for 3NT|pg||
nt|roswolf: well 5@D is not a bad spot looking at the n/s cards alone|pg||
nt|hedyg: depending on the lead|pg||
nt|hedyg: i dont play lower level lightners, only vs slam|pg||
nt|roswolf: in the other room 3NTreached with simple elegance|pg||
pc|dK|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s6|nt|roswolf: disaster looms|pg||
nt|hedyg: the timid double by E in OR did not help the defense|pg||
nt|odysseus69: luckier to play from South when club queen would give contract|pg||
nt|granguru:  More amendments: Wubbo de Boer, Enri leufkens, Piet Jansen and ans|pg||
pc|s3|nt|roswolf: fielders choice almost|pg||
nt|MolvaM: the disaster started with south's double|pg||
pc|s7|pg||
nt|hedyg: now he runs to 5@D|pg||
nt|hedyg: ?|pg||
nt|granguru:  Hans Westendorf|pg||
nt|granguru:  thanks a lot|pg||
pc|hQ|nt|MolvaM: last chance to make a doubled 5@d|pg||
nt|granguru:  Hans Westerhof sorry|pg||
nt|stc: on the way to -13 IMP|pg||
nt|odysseus69: if North had cQ rather than dQ it would be huge slam|pg||
nt|granguru:  NPC Jaap Trouwborst|pg||
nt|stc: yes, and hard to localize the unknown Q|pg||
nt|odysseus69: can make on diamond lead but dont think they will get one|pg||
nt|stc: he can't make even on @d lead|pg||
pc|h2|pc|hA|pc|h4|pg||
nt|hedyg: Q@H in case N covers|pg||
pc|dA|nt|odysseus69: Souths think shows a void and wondering how to respond -no point in showing|pg||
pc|d9|nt|hedyg: how many @ds does N need to bid them?|pg||
nt|roswolf: hmm well i have been in worse contracts|pg||
nt|stc: he got the @D lead, still -1|pg||
nt|runnerup: not huge possobilities ,now made anyway|pg||
nt|granguru:  Very Bridge Cultivated people I see....I also had the BB in my hands on that ocation, but just to take me a photograph with it!|pg||
nt|granguru:  ocasion*|pg||
nt|odysseus69: sorry - cant even make on diamond lead|pg||
nt|granguru:  should lose 1 in each black suit|pg||
nt|granguru:  no endplay|pg||
nt|granguru:  no no|pg||
nt|stc: he needs QJ@H and QJ@c in the same hand, not the caase|pg||
nt|granguru:  he can drop 2 @C|pg||
pc|hJ|nt|hedyg: i am not mad about the double over 4@s|pg||
nt|roswolf: unerring|pg||
nt|granguru:  wron |pg||
nt|runnerup: ok seems impossible to get rid of 2 loosers|pg||
nt|granguru:  wrong play|pg||
pc|d2|pg||
pc|s9|nt|stc: and the @H looser ?|pg||
pc|s8|pc|s4|pc|sK|pg||
nt|rcerreto: +1|pg||
pc|d7|nt|MolvaM: smirnov wanted to get rich instantly but this will also help|pg||
pc|d8|nt|roswolf: sensible|pg||
nt|hedyg: you know they will run if you double|pg||
pc|dT|pc|s2|pg||
pc|sQ|nt|granguru:  y no way|pg||
pc|h3|nt|roswolf: just -1 and another 11 imps to team bessis|pg||
nt|MolvaM: do you want to hear my latest update on the positive side of things? :)|pg||
nt|MolvaM: still 4 more boards remain |pg||
nt|MolvaM: 5 rather|pg||
nt|roswolf: lol - 4x24imps would be enough to win 25-0 indeed|pg||
pc|d5|pc|sJ|pg||
nt|hedyg: 9 imps/bd? thats a lot|pg||
pc|cQ|nt|stc: of course he has 11 tricks and defense must be awake|pg||
nt|granguru:  depended on the @S finesse or some favourable position of the @C|pg||
pc|c6|pc|c2|pc|c5|pg||
pc|sT|nt|granguru:  such as stiff @CQJ or @CH and @CHxxx|pg||
nt|granguru:  abd guessing it|pg||
nt|granguru:  and guessing it|pg||
pc|h7|pc|h9|pc|h5|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c7|pc|cJ|pc|cA|pg||
mc|11|nt|stc: or as i said a sqz @H/@C, just move the J@h in W and he makes|pg||
pg||
qx|o16|st||md|2S95HAK2DQ64CKT983,SAK82HQ8754D92CQJ,SHJT93DAKJT753C64,SQJT7643H6D8CA752|sv|e|nt|toral5: hoiland wd ve been relieved to see no @C ruff|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
mb|1H|mb|4D|mb|4S|mb|5D|mb|p|mb|p|nt|toral5: how did west make 5@S?|pg||
mb|5S|mb|p|mb|p|nt|santyclz: Hover your mouse pointed over the closed room result to see the bidding there.|pg||
nt|toral5: but how it was made?|pg||
nt|toral5: this will surely be a 13 imp pick up for angelini|pg||
mb|6D|mb|d|mb|p|nt|santyclz: @d lead, pitched the @h cashed the @sa and hooked the 9 (not in that order) lost a @c and a @s.|pg||
nt|toral5: pitched?|pg||
nt|toral5: both have @D|pg||
nt|henryb:  Apparently S led @hAK|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|pc|h6|nt|toral5: this also a super save against the score in the other room|pg||
nt|santyclz: Oh, I thought you were talking about last hand.|pg||
nt|toral5: 1 down is still 11 imps|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h4|pc|h3|pg||
pc|d4|pc|d9|pc|dK|pc|d8|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c5|nt|toral5: or is it making?|pg||
pc|cT|pc|cJ|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|toral5: thank god east did not panic.else 6 was made|pg||
pc|sK|pc|d7|pc|s3|pc|s5|pg||
pc|dT|pc|s4|pc|d6|pc|d2|pg||
pc|c6|pc|cA|pc|c3|pc|cQ|pg||
mc|11|pg||
qx|c16|st||md|2S95HAK2DQ64CKT983,SAK82HQ8754D92CQJ,SHJT93DAKJT753C64,SQJT7643H6D8CA752|sv|e|nt|hedyg: well ok, just 8.5...|pg||
nt|hedyg: piece of cake|pg||
nt|roswolf: yup and very nearly impossible without the Total Improbability Drive |pg||
mb|1H|nt|roswolf: which is a fine Concept by the late Douglas Adams|pg||
nt|odysseus69: action board|pg||
mb|4D|nt|jbgood: I am told that Angelini is also in 6@h next dorr on   14!|pg||
nt|rcerreto: 5@d in NS|pg||
nt|jbgood: door even|pg||
nt|rcerreto: but EW can get to 5@s -1|pg||
mb|4S|nt|stc: a true freak now|pg||
nt|hedyg: yes Hampson in 6@H|pg||
mb|5D|nt|granguru:  would you open N or E hands given the opportunity?|pg||
nt|jbgood: 5@s a good save:)|pg||
nt|rcerreto: popular slam contract|pg||
mb|5S|nt|roswolf: a chance for some imps to the polish team|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|stc: OR NS didn't discover the -2 defense|pg||
nt|odysseus69: both|pg||
nt|granguru:  I think no one would pass these days|pg||
mb|p|nt|rcerreto: verifying you're missing AK@d proved too difficult, after all|pg||
nt|hedyg: Hampson could have stayed out of slam after Greco showed short @c over 2NT|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h4|pc|hJ|nt|odysseus69: never mind these days- I would have opened 50 years ago|pg||
nt|odysseus69: its opening on balanced 11 counts that I cant master|pg||
nt|granguru:  Bertens should -1 soon if he plays the hand|pg||
pc|h6|pg||
nt|stc: in OR N lead the A@c|pg||
nt|granguru:  but NS have slam ambitions again|pg||
nt|jbgood: Brekka is an imaginative player, so you never know what to expect when he preempts green versus red|pg||
nt|jbgood: needs to take the @d trick now|pg||
pc|hA|nt|granguru:  ARE WE DEFENDING OR ATTACKING?|pg||
nt|runnerup: wild one clubs never mensioned and if you guess-whitch you never do 6 clubs makes |pg||
nt|stc: 6@c are cold, double dummy|pg||
nt|runnerup: ok -it came up now|pg||
nt|granguru:  matushko did not bid 5@C but makes them appear now...|pg||
nt|granguru:  Now Bertens must decide to defend|pg||
nt|odysseus69: will South sit?? - I think no|pg||
pc|h5|pc|h3|nt|roswolf: another wierd switch|pg||
pc|s3|pg||
nt|hedyg: she surely thought singleton J@H|pg||
pc|s6|nt|rcerreto: ouch!|pg||
pc|s5|pc|sA|pc|d3|pg||
nt|jbgood: couldnt be singleton jack|pg||
nt|rcerreto: she didn't expect pd to have 4@h|pg||
pc|sK|pc|d5|nt|stc: X was giving the wining line in 6@C !!|pg||
nt|granguru:  WESTRA made a big error |pg||
nt|runnerup: south did but run him self hmm..|pg||
nt|odysseus69: intersting now|pg||
pc|s4|nt|granguru:  thinking no slam was there he doubled 6@C|pg||
nt|runnerup: north i mean the bidder|pg||
nt|josj: E should have X'd 6@H for the lead...|pg||
nt|stc: and next big error, on the way to +1 now|pg||
nt|josj: and we can see now why...|pg||
nt|odysseus69: East failed to double - which might have alerted partner to club lead|pg||
nt|granguru:  only way to beat was to lead a @C..double dummy|pg||
nt|runnerup: this makes or + 1 now|pg||
nt|stc: about 25 IMP was hanging on the lead|pg||
pc|s9|pg||
nt|rcerreto: the save proved *very* good|pg||
nt|jbgood: they play low-high as come on - and E wouldnt bid 4@s with 4 hearts?|pg||
nt|jbgood: heart J was discouraging. Period.|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h9|nt|hedyg: now a @d|pg||
pc|d8|nt|hedyg: ok no @d :(|pg||
pc|h2|pg||
nt|rcerreto: if J can't be doubleton, then playing 2 rounds is strange|pg||
nt|hedyg: he might with 6 good @ss and 4 bad @hs|pg||
nt|rcerreto: playing upside-down...|pg||
nt|jbgood: a concentration lapse|pg||
nt|rcerreto: likely|pg||
nt|hedyg: they seem to be playing standard count|pg||
pc|s2|nt|hedyg: from what i can see|pg||
pc|d7|pc|s7|pc|d4|pg||
nt|jbgood: but like almost all Norwegians, low-hi encouraging|pg||
mc|11|nt|rcerreto: moreover, if declarer has so many hearts, maybe you don't need a ruff to set|pg||
nt|rcerreto: either A@d or K@c should score the 3rd trick|pg||
pg||
qx|o17|st||md|3S43HAKDAK542CT976,SQJ762HJT54D9CKQ5,S95H98732D763C842,SAKT8HQ6DQJT8CAJ3|sv|o|nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
mb|p|nt|toral5: a flat @S game coming up|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
mb|1N|nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: 3 boards to go... 10IMP different...|pg||
nt|santyclz: Hefty nt with only 2 cards below an 8.|pg||
mb|d|an| |nt|toral5: dbl=?|pg||
mb|p|mb|2C|mb|p|mb|2D|nt|santyclz: Perhaps a 1 suiter as in DONT.|pg||
nt|toral5: dbl and pass both needs explaination|pg||
nt|toral5: ok|pg||
mb|3D|nt|toral5: 2@D x is not gr8 for ew|pg||
mb|p|nt|santyclz: Holland is taking no risk of a pnlty pass.|pg||
mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|toral5: why is east hiding his 4 card @S suit?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl  |pg||
pc|dA|pc|d9|nt|toral5: or would have taken 3@D=bid 3nt with @D stop|pg||
pc|d3|nt|santyclz: DONT (Disturb Opponents NT) gains an imp.|pg||
pc|d8|pg||
nt|toral5: east should be thanked for that:)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: Open Teams Swiss (round 2) should begin at 18:45, so in 30minutes...|pg||
nt|toral5: greco will cash his 4 tricks|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: so players are late...|pg||
pc|c6|nt|toral5: and surprisingly gain an imp|pg||
pc|c5|pc|c8|pc|cJ|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|dK|nt|toral5: now cash out time|pg||
pc|h4|pc|d6|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h5|pc|h2|nt|toral5: wel done|pg||
pc|h6|pg||
pc|hK|nt|toral5: presumming he cashes @H king|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|c17|st||md|3S43HAKDAK542CT976,SQJ762HJT54D9CKQ5,S95H98732D763C842,SAKT8HQ6DQJT8CAJ3|sv|o|nt|roswolf: but still 2 imps to the trailing team|pg||
nt|hedyg: those 2 imps wont help them a lot|pg||
nt|hedyg: easy for us|pg||
mb|p|nt|rcerreto: as usual|pg||
nt|hedyg: J@H was not a helpful card|pg||
nt|jbgood: Easy for lady Bird too - but she had a black out|pg||
nt|jbgood: and that happens to us all|pg||
nt|hedyg: 1@c= 16+ any|pg||
mb|1C|nt|rcerreto: Yarborough in N|pg||
mb|2C|an|!D|nt|rcerreto: not even a 10|pg||
mb|2S|nt|stc: 6@s played by E are always -2 for a loss of 8IMP|pg||
nt|hedyg: 2@c= @d?|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: ty Simona!|pg||
mb|4S|nt|jbgood: dont know - perhaps @d or majors...|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl3: hi all|pg||
mb|p|pc|d3|nt|vugraphpl3: np @H|pg||
pc|dQ|nt|vugraphpl3: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrleaderb.html|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d9|pg||
nt|odysseus69: Queen a bad idea|pg||
nt|hedyg: next match supposed to start in 30 minutes..|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h5|nt|granguru:  Wshould have simply passed 6@C|pg||
pc|h2|nt|hedyg: really K@S?|pg||
pc|h6|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h4|pc|h3|pc|hQ|pg||
nt|chilloncan: hi all:)|pg||
nt|chilloncan: welcome to cloudy poznan|pg||
pc|d4|nt|stc: and hopy on a @s lead|pg||
pc|sJ|nt|stc: hope|pg||
mc|10|pg||
qx|o18|st||md|4S865HAJ93DAQ93C94,S92HQ864DJT6CKQJ6,SAKQJ74H5D542CA82,ST3HKT72DK87CT753|sv|n|nt|toral5: :)|pg||
mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
mb|1D|mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|nt|toral5: another duller for the spectators:(|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2H|an| |mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
nt|santyclz: Probably a transfer back to @ss.|pg||
mb|3C|an| |nt|santyclz: Now I'm lost.|pg||
mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|nt|toral5: 3@C is just like the trfer bid on 1nt|pg||
nt|toral5: 1nt-2@H(trf)-3@C/3@D=xx in the bid suit and super accept|pg||
nt|toral5: this 3nt=serious i guess|pg||
mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
pc|h7|nt|toral5: 3rd 5th leads for ew here|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h4|pc|h5|pg||
pc|c9|pc|cJ|pc|cA|pc|c3|pg||
nt|santyclz: So a roundabout auction to the expected contract.|pg||
nt|toral5: yes|pg||
nt|henryb:  If it was serious, S would have cue bid with 4 kontrols|pg||
nt|toral5: thats what i m thinking why did he signed off 4s|pg||
nt|toral5: and what was that 3nt with xxx @D and 6 solid @S|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s5|pc|s2|pg||
pc|sK|pc|sT|pc|s6|pc|s9|pg||
mc|11|nt|henryb:  nom-serious slam try|pg||
pg||
qx|c18|st||md|4S865HAJ93DAQ93C94,S92HQ864DJT6CKQJ6,SAKQJ74H5D542CA82,ST3HKT72DK87CT753|sv|n|nt|rcerreto: easy 4@s or 3NT in NS|pg||
mb|p|nt|granguru:  It might be possible that they play the Slam Spade convention where a x asked for a @S lead..no double, no interest in a @S lead...|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|roswolf: should be a straightforward push|pg||
nt|runnerup: too easy looking game to give dutch any hope to get back imps|pg||
mb|1S|nt|granguru:  The IMP magazine will be hard on himself in Westra's column next issue|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: stayman...and then i play over 2@d 4@c= 6@H+4@S, 4@D=6@S+4@H|pg||
mb|2D|nt|odysseus69: can t see any chance of getting too high here|pg||
mb|p|nt|chilloncan: this is more like it:)|pg||
nt|roswolf: stayman with 6-4!?|pg||
nt|hedyg: sure! pd can have 4@hs|pg||
nt|hedyg: or you smolen and over 3NT you bid your singleton..|pg||
nt|odysseus69: 2 imps available for a diamond lead|pg||
nt|jbgood: and 4@s|pg||
mb|4S|nt|hedyg: all depending on agreements|pg||
mb|p|nt|granguru:  N can make 6@S |pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: a magical mystery tour|pg||
nt|hedyg: Michel Bessis just transferred @s and bid 4@s|pg||
nt|roswolf: indeed as would i|pg||
mb|p|nt|runnerup: just east migth lead k @c so if you bid slam,even that makes but no probable |pg||
nt|granguru:  as E will probably lead a @C|pg||
nt|stc: good time for a psych @d cue bid|pg||
nt|hedyg: the score for bd 12 was not entered into the bridgemate at this table? it is not scored in the official score|pg||
pc|s3|pc|s5|pc|s2|nt|chilloncan: easy to see why S bid 5C though a responsive double will probably gain when N has a 5-card major. The fact that E bid only 4D at favorable, though, might suggest to Robson that he ...|pg||
nt|chilloncan: would not be averse to defending 4M. meanwhile a very brisk 5C call might fetch a lucrative sacrifice, hopefully a phantom|pg||
pc|s7|pg||
nt|runnerup: perhaps no need for jokes|pg||
nt|odysseus69: 2/1 sequences seem t feature a 2NT bid on second round from responder - then an expression of his values|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c3|pc|c9|pc|cJ|pg||
nt|roswolf: save me from this sequence quick|pg||
nt|hedyg: Simone please can you send me 1 of those nice Lavazza boys i saw in the pictures? with an espresso!|pg||
nt|granguru:  now 5@S by S asks for a @D stopper.. pass = no, and the @D lead is obvious...|pg||
pc|s9|pc|sA|nt|chilloncan: 6S is another aggressive action, in light of already having bid 5C freely. But S could have plenty of hands for 5C that are not nearly this good for spades....three spades and a ...|pg||
nt|chilloncan: ruffing value, plus the whole club suit may come in. sometimes 13 would be easy|pg||
pc|sT|pc|s6|pg||
pc|h5|pc|h2|nt|chilloncan: for example, if EW had one more club and one fewer heart, this would make|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h4|pg||
nt|odysseus69: auction seems to be calling for diamond lead but no|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h6|pc|sJ|pc|h7|pg||
nt|granguru:  but if N says 6@S=yes, paradoxically E is inhibited to lead a @D|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: E wants Director|pg||
nt|runnerup: east  was not listening i think |pg||
nt|granguru:  Fiction bridge thou|pg||
pc|d2|nt|odysseus69: problem with explanation of 2NT maybe|pg||
pc|d7|pc|d9|pc|dJ|pg||
mc|11|pg||
qx|o19|st||md|1SA7HQJ95DJT87CJT9,SQT643HDKQ2CAQ432,SJHKT8763DA65C765,SK9852HA42D943CK8|sv|e|nt|vugraphpl2: 2 boards to go....|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|nt|toral5: i am tired of saying FLAT DULL BOARDS:(|pg||
nt|henryb:  then don't say it|pg||
mb|2N|nt|toral5: lets hope we get to see some fireworks on the last 1|pg||
mb|p|mb|4H|mb|d|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|nt|santyclz: Nice sac available in 5@hx'd, but w wouldn't sit for it.|pg||
mb|p|pc|c5|pc|cK|nt|toral5: yes |pg||
pc|cJ|pc|c2|pg||
pc|s2|pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|sJ|pg||
pc|dT|pc|dK|pc|dA|pc|d3|pg||
pc|d6|pc|d4|pc|dJ|pc|dQ|pg||
pc|s4|mc|10|nt|santyclz: Surely not.|pg||
nt|henryb:  After the double of 4@h, I think East should cross to hand to lead the @s towards dummy|pg||
pg||
qx|c19|st||md|1SA7HQJ95DJT87CJT9,SQT643HDKQ2CAQ432,SJHKT8763DA65C765,SK9852HA42D943CK8|sv|e|nt|chilloncan: 1N-3N awaits|pg||
nt|odysseus69: my limited understanding gives me the impression that 2NT is often like 4th suit forcing only at a lower level|pg||
nt|hedyg: last 2 boards|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: next sesion 18.45|pg||
mb|1N|an| |mb|2S|an|!S +minor|nt|rcerreto: another mini-notrump|pg||
nt|rcerreto: this time EW will have less problem getting to game|pg||
mb|3H|nt|granguru:  score of hand 10 is wrong hand is not played yet|pg||
nt|hedyg: micro?|pg||
mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|roswolf: the more i see it a gambling 3nt in a minoe hasnt much to recommend it -now showing a major is a different matter|pg||
nt|hedyg: ok thanks Simona|pg||
nt|jbgood: 8-12 i belive|pg||
pc|h6|nt|chilloncan: 9 trix await|pg||
nt|chilloncan: since E has only 2 diamonds|pg||
nt|runnerup: ..3nt ..so nothing special|pg||
pc|h2|pc|hJ|pc|s3|pg||
nt|hedyg: gambling, not promising those outside queens|pg||
pc|s4|nt|chilloncan: oops a snag there. was expecting spade ace to block the suit|pg||
pc|sJ|pc|sK|pc|sA|pg||
nt|odysseus69: same contract different route|pg||
pc|dJ|nt|runnerup: so 1 more imp for a good lead|pg||
nt|odysseus69: this type of laydown usually takes a long time with increasing delays from about 4th club on|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|dA|pc|d3|pg||
mc|11|pg||
qx|o20|st||md|2SK3HQJT52DQ8743C3,SQ96HA876DAKCQJ76,SJT82HKDT9652CKT2,SA754H943DJCA9854|sv|b|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|2C|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|3C|mb|p|nt|santyclz: 2@s is invitational with 4@ss.|pg||
mb|4S|nt|toral5: 2@S=4 cards,forcing up to 2nt|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|toral5: a bidding confusion here|pg||
pc|c3|nt|henryb:  scores: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
nt|toral5: 3@C wd have been taken as 4s|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: last board|pg||
nt|santyclz: Thanks Maria, great job.|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|cK|pc|cA|pg||
pc|s4|nt|vugraphpl2: the next (last) round for today shopul begin in 20 minutes|pg||
nt|toral5: did well by not leading @H q as the cards lie|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|toral5: when is the next set?|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s6|pc|s2|pg||
nt|Walddk8: In about 15 minutes|pg||
pc|d4|pc|dK|pc|d2|pc|dJ|pg||
nt|santyclz: Sched to begin in about 2 min, I doubt it will.  Vg in your timezone: http://online.bridgebase.com/vugraph/schedule.php  Make it your home page!|pg||
nt|toral5: ok.|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s8|pc|s5|pc|s3|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
pc|s9|pc|sT|pc|sA|pc|d3|pg||
pc|c5|nt|santyclz: 4@s is lucky that the @c break sets 3nt as well.|pg||
nt|toral5: declarer still has a trump+@C loser along with some @H|pg||
pc|h2|pc|cJ|pc|c2|pg||
pc|c6|pc|cT|pc|c4|pc|d7|pg||
mc|9|nt|santyclz: Thanks all, bye for now.|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: so see you in 15 minutes :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bye :)|pg||
pg||
qx|c20|st||md|2SK3HQJT52DQ8743C3,SQ96HA876DAKCQJ76,SJT82HKDT9652CKT2,SA754H943DJCA9854|sv|b|nt|chilloncan: while away i reconsidered my analysis. i think now that the percentages are in fact in favor of Allfrey's playing small from dummy at trick one|pg||
nt|roswolf: :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: last board of this match now|pg||
nt|odysseus69: time saver - thank you Westra|pg||
nt|hedyg: last board now|pg||
nt|hedyg: thanks to our outstanding operator in Poznan, Simona!to my excellent fellow commentators Jon and Rodolfo for donating their time and expertise to guide us through these boards.our ...|pg||
nt|hedyg: appreciation to the EBL and the PBF for bringing this event to BBO, especially Slawek Latala  who was intrumental in organizing these broadcasts on behalf of BBO|pg||
mb|1C!|an| |nt|hedyg: thanks to our outstanding operator in Poznan, Simona!to my excellent fellow commentators Geoffrey and Murat for donating their time and expertise to guide us through these ...|pg||
nt|hedyg: boards.our appreciation to the EBL and the PBF for bringing this event to BBO, especially Slawek Latala  who was intrumental in organizing these broadcasts on behalf of BBO|pg||
nt|hedyg: special thanks to our specs for joining and for your kind and helpful comments,we hope you enjoyed the show|pg||
nt|hedyg: special thanks to our specs for joining and for your kind and helpful comments,we hope you enjoyed the show|pg||
mb|p|mb|1N|an| |nt|chilloncan: haste makes waste:)|pg||
nt|hedyg: we will be back for the last round of the RR in 32 minutes|pg||
nt|jbgood: 1 nt= 5+ @c and positive|pg||
mb|p|mb|2C|an| |nt|vugraphpl3: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrleaderb.html|pg||
nt|hedyg: we will be back at 18 45 CET, in 30 minutes|pg||
mb|p|mb|2S|an| |nt|hedyg: 1@c any 17+|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: 1NT= 8+, 5+ @cs|pg||
mb|3N|mb|p|nt|hedyg: 3NT looks right with the W hand|pg||
nt|roswolf: IF an early heart switch the contract should go down|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: good point hedy|pg||
nt|hedyg: is this early enough?|pg||
nt|roswolf: :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: Bessis in 3@HX in the OR|pg||
nt|odysseus69: switch n/s and they have an overtrick|pg||
nt|runnerup: tx all -last looks like a bit too ambitious 4 hearts but can happen here also|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: 2@c relay i assume|pg||
nt|jbgood: since they play 1 NT 12-15, they have to open 1@c on 16|pg||
nt|rcerreto: they are in a game forcing situation|pg||
pc|hQ|nt|chilloncan: why is the team name "skwark"? Allfrey-Robson play on the Allfrey team|pg||
nt|jbgood: ace is good now|pg||
nt|rcerreto: normal lead but @d would have worked better|pg||
nt|hedyg: 2@S? controls or natural?|pg||
pc|h6|pc|hK|nt|odysseus69: well judged all round|pg||
nt|chilloncan: hi victor:)|pg||
pc|h3|pg||
nt|rcerreto: natural, maybe|pg||
pc|dT|pc|dJ|nt|hedyg: i thought they show controls 2nd bid|pg||
nt|jbgood: 5 clubs and 4 spades|pg||
pc|d3|nt|odysseus69: spade spade defeats 4H|pg||
pc|dK|pg||
pc|cQ|nt|hedyg: he was saving his father from 3@C X|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c4|nt|chilloncan: on  19 N got a reprieve when W shifted to a D. then N had to decide who had the club ace|pg||
nt|runnerup: so Lazy goes on as a winner and dutch drops out |pg||
nt|odysseus69: thx all - had a little excitement|pg||
pc|c3|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|cK|nt|hedyg: E did not open there|pg||
pc|cA|pc|h5|pg||
nt|hedyg: cannot be controls|pg||
pc|c9|pc|d4|pc|c6|nt|hedyg: p-3@C-p-p-X-p-p3@H-p-p-X|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: thx everyone|pg||
pc|cT|pg||
pc|d5|pc|s4|nt|rcerreto: ducking the lead wasn't the better choice|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|dA|pg||
nt|jbgood: gave away tempo|pg||
nt|rcerreto: yes|pg||
nt|rcerreto: he escaped the @d lead|pg||
pc|c7|pc|s8|pc|c8|nt|rcerreto: but gave a 2nd chance|pg||
pc|h2|pg||
pc|c5|nt|jbgood: and hearts were likely to be blocked at any rate... so|pg||
pc|d7|pc|h7|nt|rcerreto: N couldn't miss it|pg||
nt|hedyg: A@S first|pg||
pc|d2|pg||
pc|h4|pc|hT|pc|hA|nt|hedyg: ty all, see you in 27 minutes!|pg||
nt|roswolf: BYE ALL FOR NOW|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: bye :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: see You soon |pg||
pc|s2|pg||
nt|rcerreto: noo|pg||
nt|rcerreto: ah, 1@d is enough|pg||
nt|hedyg: yes|pg||
nt|rcerreto: sorry for having had a bad thought :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: he was down anyhow|pg||
nt|hedyg: lol|pg||
pc|s6|nt|hedyg: ty all! see you in a bit!|pg||
mc|8|nt|jbgood: bye for now|pg||
nt|rcerreto: thank everybody, bye!!|pg||
nt|vugraphpl3: see You. 18.45!|pg||
pg||