vg|D EC 2011 Open Teams 16 _,1_2,I,1,14,Kamras,0,Rosenthal,0|
rs|5HW-2,2SN-2,3CW-1,3CE-1,2SN+3,2SN+3,3CN-2,2NN=,2DE+1,3NE-2,1SE=,2DE=,3NS+1,2HWx-4,3DN=,1NW-2,2HS+3,3HS+2,1NE-1,1NE=,4HW+2,4HW+3,6NW=,6NW=,3NN-2,3NS-3,3NE=,3NW=|
pn|Wikner,Silverstei,Tornqvist,Rosenthal,Fallenius,Cullin,Fredin,Upmark|pg||
qx|o1|st||md|3SA3HT87DK98432C98,ST942HK93DJT65C72,SKQJ65H54D7CKT653,S87HAQJ62DAQCAQJ4|sv|o|nt|vugraphpl2: all players at the table, we have correct boards so we can begin :)|pg||
mb|p|mb|2N|nt|jr7: 4@h must bee the end|pg||
mb|p|mb|3C|mb|p|mb|3N|an| |mb|p|mb|4D|mb|p|mb|5C|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or16runda1.html|pg||
nt|jr7: a sort af Amerikan stayman - Showing 5@H-color|pg||
mb|p|nt|jr7: but now something vent wrong! :)|pg||
mb|5H|an| |mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
mb|p|pc|sK|nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins |pg||
nt|jr7: 1 down :(|pg||
pc|s7|nt|santyclz: Hi folks.|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: hi :)|pg||
nt|jr7: hi|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s2|pg||
pc|s3|pc|s4|pc|sJ|pc|s8|pg||
pc|d7|pc|dQ|pc|dK|pc|d5|pg||
pc|d9|pc|d6|pc|h4|pc|dA|pg||
pc|c5|pc|cQ|pc|c8|pc|c2|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h7|pc|h3|pc|h5|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h8|pc|h9|pc|c3|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|c1|st||md|3SA3HT87DK98432C98,ST942HK93DJT65C72,SKQJ65H54D7CKT653,S87HAQJ62DAQCAQJ4|sv|o|nt|ralfwil: hello Martin!|pg||
nt|vugraphpl7: we have a problem|pg||
nt|jr7: Maybee East still is a sleep! :-)|pg||
nt|jr7: :(|pg||
nt|vugraphpl7: they are playing but i have mistake in boards|pg||
nt|ady: how many go through?|pg||
nt|kastan88: 3 best teams from each group (8 teams) qualifying to Swiss A|pg||
nt|jbgood: hi|pg||
nt|kastan88: hej Jon|pg||
nt|ady: thx|pg||
nt|alok_daga: starts with a bang|pg||
nt|alok_daga: A grand for EW,highly biddable|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: hi all|pg||
nt|hawe45:  3 NT - easy to make, but to bid it - I doubt...|pg||
nt|cenglund:  Hello everybody|pg||
nt|hawe45:  hi|pg||
nt|roswolf: ITALY V NORWAY HERE|pg||
mb|1C|mb|1D|nt|alok_daga: playing IMPS wud prefer 2 bid 7dmnds|pg||
nt|alok_daga: 1nt (tr 2 dmnds),acceptance,RKC,5NT 7|pg||
nt|pelu: Hi all wellcome to the first KO-match|pg||
mb|p|nt|ady: 4@H looks ok for e/w   but can beaten if defence finds 2 diamond ruffs|pg||
mb|1S|nt|ady: 5@D  makes if getting heart right|pg||
nt|jbgood: and 4@s or 5@c playable|pg||
nt|ady: n/s  do well in spades in spite of 4-1 split|pg||
nt|ady: sorry of course 3 losers in diamonds for e/w|pg||
nt|hawe45:  If 2 @D is a weak-2 - it´s awful|pg||
nt|suketbombi: 5@H here would be a great sucess for E-W unless  N-s finds an impossible @D ruff|pg||
nt|vugraphpl7: E: http://www.worldbridge.org/people/person.asp?qryid=7668|pg||
nt|pelu: to make 4@S decl has to duck @s 2x, but as u see 5@H close to make - only defense: @DA and small @S to Q - almost impossible to find|pg||
nt|vugraphpl7: W: http://www.worldbridge.org/people/person.asp?qryid=3480|pg||
nt|suketbombi: yes|pg||
nt|pelu: Hi Raju wellcome|pg||
nt|vugraphpl7: W: http://eurobridge.org/scripts/person.asp?qryid=3733|pg||
nt|xenya: hello everyone|pg||
nt|roswolf: hi vladimir|pg||
nt|xenya: hello Geoffrey|pg||
nt|vugraphpl7: S: http://eurobridge.org/scripts/person.asp?qryid=935|pg||
nt|vugraphpl7: N: http://eurobridge.org/scripts/person.asp?qryid=3399|pg||
nt|geot: Hi friends:)|pg||
mb|d|nt|suketbombi: GM peter Thx and welcome all the specs|pg||
nt|roswolf: normal start how enterprising is west "!?|pg||
mb|p|mb|1N|nt|alok_daga: 3spades=shortage,I assume|pg||
mb|2C|nt|geot: Geoffrey, Vlad, and specs|pg||
mb|d|nt|roswolf: hmm nrway strikes first|pg||
nt|xenya: hello Geo|pg||
nt|mamos: good afternoon|pg||
mb|r|nt|rmb1: 4@D seems to have stolen the hand|pg||
nt|cenglund:  I would not open 2H with 4 cards in the other major in 2nd hand|pg||
nt|hawe45:  And so much values in minors|pg||
nt|alok_daga: 4cl by East,now all Forcing|pg||
nt|pelu: the X is the clue to S to find the winning plan|pg||
nt|suketbombi: good board for australia if they make this it will be ahugh bonus not very tuff|pg||
nt|suketbombi: @C ace is off hence let it be doubleon then|pg||
nt|suketbombi: sorry very sorry|pg||
nt|suketbombi: South Africa was dreaming:):)|pg||
mb|p|mb|2S|nt|fabsayc: 420 is par, use entries for spade finesses|pg||
nt|ralfwil: important to finess in @s immediately|pg||
nt|ady: not the way to beat 4@H|pg||
mb|p|nt|jr7: Hi all - no names, but we are playing|pg||
mb|p|nt|jbgood: and the trump lead doesnt hurt declarer much|pg||
nt|alok_daga: hope bidding 6 does not go unpunished as a flat brd|pg||
nt|alok_daga: Fantoni,Nunes miss this cold grand?|pg||
nt|mamos: NS rying to mess with EWs auction here|pg||
nt|hawe45:  3 NT from West - and North must lead a SMALL @S...|pg||
mb|p|nt|geot: Duboins double was of course a reasonable choice, but no success here|pg||
nt|psyck: Hello everyone|pg||
nt|roswolf: a bit too pushy by west although 5@D would not be a success either|pg||
nt|hawe45:  - making with the @H 10 in South|pg||
pc|s8|nt|roswolf: are these the right teams/names?|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Ace of @H and a @h will be a deception for North|pg||
nt|xenya: this will be painful for Lavazza|pg||
nt|mamos: 4@h better|pg||
nt|mamos: wow  seems odd to sell out to this|pg||
nt|hawe45:  No - 4 @H always down, as long as South does NOT take the @D King|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Tactic: Write a + - and win|pg||
pc|sA|nt|roswolf: hi CK|pg||
pc|s2|nt|rmb1: North needed to make more of his club suit in the auction|pg||
pc|s5|pg||
nt|davpro: Well done|pg||
pc|c8|pc|c2|pc|c3|nt|alok_daga: this 7 ,playing teams by any standard shud br a push.F&N will be v upset I am sure|pg||
nt|davpro: true|pg||
nt|suketbombi: too fast|pg||
nt|pelu: 5@S x in OR hare S only open 1@S and EW could easy fins the @H-fit and bid on to 5@h|pg||
pc|cJ|pg||
nt|fabsayc: there is more though, some chance of a squeeze for 5|pg||
nt|mamos: letting your opponnets play 2@s-3   seems dubious tactics|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d2|pc|d5|pc|d7|pg||
pc|s7|pc|s3|pc|s4|nt|roswolf: they will need some expresso's|pg||
pc|sK|pg||
pc|sQ|nt|geot: West wanted to cater for partner having some nice spades behind and not commit his own partnership to the 5 level |pg||
pc|h2|pc|d3|pc|s9|pg||
nt|ralfwil: only a mistake in the defence can give 11 tricks|pg||
pc|sJ|nt|xenya: going for the maximum|pg||
pc|dQ|nt|psyck: Hi Geo, Geoffrey, & Vladimir|pg||
pc|d4|pc|sT|pg||
nt|kirp:  Hi y'all, EW play a Precison-based @C system, not sure what NS Play (may be Polish)|pg||
pc|h5|pc|hJ|pc|h7|nt|hawe45:  But 140 looks normal - mayby 150 at the other table|pg||
nt|cenglund:  I am pretty sure that Apteker-Gower end up in 3NT|pg||
pc|h9|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h8|pc|h3|nt|fabsayc: but west led low diamond so error chance is real|pg||
pc|h4|pg||
pc|h6|pc|hT|pc|hK|nt|mamos: Hans is right though any plus wll gain as EW got very overheated in OR|pg||
pc|s6|pg||
pc|cK|pc|cA|pc|c9|pc|c7|pg||
nt|hawe45:  2 down - East discarded a @H-winner earlier|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|d8|pc|d6|pc|c5|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|d9|pc|dT|pc|c6|pg||
pc|c4|pc|dK|pc|dJ|pc|cT|pg||
pg||
qx|o2|st||md|4SAQJ863HK864DA8CQ,S974H92D32CAJ8652,ST2HT7DQT9654CKT4,SK5HAQJ53DKJ7C973|sv|n|nt|jr7: 3nt=5@H, 4@D=transfer, 5@C = good hand, no spadecontrol BUT NOT SO GOOD HAND :)|pg||
mb|1H|mb|1S|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or16runda1.html|pg||
mb|p|mb|d|mb|r|nt|santyclz: Not a lot of extras after opening 2nt.|pg||
mb|3C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sT|pc|sK|pc|sA|pc|s4|pg||
nt|jr7: I have bid 3@D :)|pg||
pc|sJ|pc|s7|pc|s2|pc|s5|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s9|pc|cT|pc|h3|pg||
pc|d9|pc|dJ|pc|dA|pc|d2|pg||
pc|s8|pc|h2|pc|cK|pc|h5|pg||
pc|dT|pc|dK|pc|d8|pc|d3|pg||
pc|c3|pc|cQ|pc|cA|pc|c4|pg||
mc|8|pg||
qx|c2|st||md|4SAQJ863HK864DA8CQ,S974H92D32CAJ8652,ST2HT7DQT9654CKT4,SK5HAQJ53DKJ7C973|sv|n|nt|kirp:  Small slam potential for NS, some interference possible by EW|pg||
nt|hawe45:  How to bid 3 NT - I see no way to that contract|pg||
nt|cenglund:  There is a risk to end up in 4 hearts|pg||
nt|cenglund:  They probably open 1H|pg||
nt|hawe45:  It would have more idea to open THIS West-hand with 2 @D|pg||
nt|cenglund:  It was a disaster for the South Africans|pg||
nt|hawe45:  - but I would´nt do it|pg||
nt|pelu: I 100% agree with Apteker to open 4@s|pg||
nt|suketbombi: would have played @S T to queen in an unlikely event @S 9 drops singleton and @DK is doubleton then think about @CS|pg||
nt|Walddk4: Welcome to Patrick|pg||
nt|patricck: Hi everyone :)|pg||
nt|suketbombi: hi Patrick|pg||
nt|pelu: another wild board|pg||
nt|roswolf: new leaders|pg||
nt|xenya: hello CK|pg||
mb|1N|nt|ady: 4@H  down 2 in open room   11 imps for Netherlands|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: Hans , Christer , Specs good afternoon to all |pg||
nt|geot: An unusual 17 imps against a team of such a standard|pg||
nt|xenya: who is to blame on that deal?|pg||
mb|2C|nt|ralfwil: but - at least in teams - declarer should have played @sA and @s10 before the last trumph. a good player can duck @sJ|pg||
nt|geot: West could certainly have bid 4NT, two places to play (minors at first)|pg||
mb|2N|nt|cenglund:  Meck opened 1D with the puny collection of high cards|pg||
nt|hawe45:  The problem is: You take these two first West-hands and compare. There is TOO much fifference - so partner never will know, what you have, when you open 2 @D|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: 2@D opener , with diferent type of hands|pg||
nt|alok_daga: 1sp 1nt 2hrts,2spades then?|pg||
nt|patricck: A nice start for the Apteker team as EW pushed the Open room pair one level higher|pg||
nt|roswolf: double game + swing|pg||
mb|p|nt|fabsayc: double by north|pg||
mb|3C|an| |nt|kirp:  As predicted!|pg||
nt|Walddk4: Welcome to Ronny|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: Hi all|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: N/S play either straight forward 2/1 or transfer after 1@c opening|pg||
nt|jbgood: N opened 3 @c and E made a nonleaping Michaels 4@d, so 4@h was wrongsided and got a @d lead|pg||
nt|rmb1: 3NT by South is not bad with spade lead from King|pg||
nt|ady: 12 tricks possible|pg||
nt|rmb1: Yes @H + @D behave well|pg||
nt|rmb1: Meanwhile South could X or bid NT now|pg||
nt|ady: not wild about 2@S from east|pg||
nt|jbgood: 500 in 2@s x - but that will not happen|pg||
nt|mamos: don't know geoffrey|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Only + = both hands had the 10 of @S|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: 11 fast reicks for N-S  in minor |pg||
nt|cenglund:  True, but I am sure they would have opened 1H, but Meck did not allow that|pg||
nt|hawe45:  It seems, that a @S-shift will kill 5 @C|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Not so fast... - these 11 tricks|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: the 11 trick of @D can be a problem in this hand |pg||
nt|roswolf: 3nt will be reached quickly here|pg||
nt|mamos: Lebensohl or equivalent here|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|oosmanb: Hi everyone|pg||
nt|kirp:  S takes ull by the horns|pg||
nt|kirp:  bull not ull|pg||
nt|oosmanb: Nice bid by South!|pg||
nt|pelu: when the X show the black suits what is 2@C then?|pg||
nt|patricck: East has taken away North's main suit|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: ah they change|pg||
nt|suketbombi: wnats to get his @S in to picture early and bid @Cs to hilt but his party is spoiled by the 2@C bid East|pg||
pc|cQ|nt|jbgood: and now 3 NT?|pg||
nt|roswolf: hi mike|pg||
nt|mamos: Mahaffey EW|pg||
nt|roswolf: at least this will be fast:)|pg||
nt|hawe45:  @H-lead is obligatory, otherwise 11 tricks|pg||
nt|pelu: 2@C just tell: be carefull N - bad distribution - |pg||
nt|pelu: N dont belive :)|pg||
nt|patricck: Now there is partnership confidence, having no doubts about partner misinterpreting the bid|pg||
nt|pelu: will S bid 3@S or give up?|pg||
nt|patricck: South is sitting there waiting for a power cut I think.....bet he doesn't feel happy about the auction|pg||
nt|mamos: 2@c showed majors  2NT was presumably relay|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c4|nt|STRIK3R: you might have seen me playing with Olsen on BBO, his nick is James950|pg||
nt|oosmanb: He's actually a regular on BBO |pg||
nt|STRIK3R: yes :)|pg||
nt|rmb1: Nowhere else to go?|pg||
nt|jbgood: 5@c also good|pg||
nt|pelu: would u in S place :)|pg||
nt|suketbombi: :)|pg||
nt|pelu: now N sh accept - his partner passed over 2@c|pg||
nt|geot: South just delay the 3NT bid here, cant really see why she did not bid 3NT over 1S|pg||
pc|c3|pg||
nt|fabsayc: is club ace realistic lead|pg||
nt|ady: 3@S North?|pg||
nt|patricck: best defence is to lead @D, A@H and another might lead to a lucky 10 tricks when the K@S falls after East has ruffed|pg||
nt|suketbombi: @DS is the best Start for defence |pg||
nt|pelu: samme bidding to 3@C in OR, but here S passed|pg||
nt|pelu: Piekarek like to X|pg||
nt|patricck: no reason to double here|pg||
pc|h2|nt|hawe45:  No @S-lead also OK naturally|pg||
nt|xenya: 3N i may be Geoffrey, but certainly not quickly|pg||
pc|h7|nt|jameslee 2: K@S lead |pg||
nt|xenya: and not 3N... |pg||
pc|hJ|nt|rmb1: 4@H will be more interesting|pg||
nt|jbgood: even 4@h:) at least on a spade lead|pg||
nt|suketbombi: nice lead :) |pg||
pc|hK|pg||
nt|fabsayc: or duck of heart lead now|pg||
nt|pelu: best attack - now prob down more that 1|pg||
nt|mamos: what options do you think South is thinking about here Hans?|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Checking the menu for dinner|pg||
nt|mamos: lol|pg||
pc|dA|nt|ralfwil: a clear duck! If declarer has @hAjxxx why not finess?|pg||
nt|alok_daga: the OR made a helptry thru a 3dmnds,here more logical,end result,same.Diff 2 bid|pg||
nt|xenya: what's going on here|pg||
nt|roswolf: 4@S on a moysian fit is unexpected|pg||
nt|psyck: S got herself worried of the @d unneccesarily|pg||
nt|geot: Hm...........as ex-Norwegian I am not to happy about this auction|pg||
nt|roswolf: 5@C on a moysian is crazy|pg||
pc|d2|nt|fabsayc: i think it is, this play only makes sense if south has heart ace|pg||
nt|geot: 25 HCPs and two balanced hands, seems to "clever" to do something like this|pg||
nt|psyck: looks like 3N would have come home with say a loser in each suit|pg||
pc|d4|nt|jameslee 2: bad luck to see 11 and not make them |pg||
pc|d7|pg||
nt|roswolf: imps back to the coffee drinkers i fancy:)|pg||
pc|d8|pc|d3|nt|patricck: best not to cover|pg||
nt|suketbombi: normaly u lead doubleton to get ruff here it is to shorten the big hand|pg||
pc|dQ|nt|jbgood: perhaps N might have tried 3@s over 3 @h?|pg||
pc|dK|pg||
nt|fabsayc: yes jack was a mistake|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Bad luck for declarer|pg||
pc|dJ|nt|jameslee 2: thats it |pg||
nt|jameslee 2: he is the one that can see them not the others |pg||
nt|hawe45:  Now -2 for 3 IMP´s|pg||
nt|hawe45:  - if he tries to make it|pg||
pc|s3|nt|hawe45:  This would be wrong with 3 @C together with 4 @D|pg||
nt|cenglund:  Spade 10 prevent declarer from squeezing East|pg||
pc|s4|pc|d5|pg||
nt|mamos: one off for push now |pg||
pc|hA|nt|jameslee 2: other room 5@C -1|pg||
pc|h4|nt|Walddk4: 2 segments of 14 boards in the R32, R16, QF and SF. 3 x 16 in the finals on Wednesday|pg||
nt|patricck: pitch a @C from dummy might be best|pg||
nt|patricck: 28 board matches are of course cutthroat, the best team often wins but the match is short enough to give the underdog a fighting chance|pg||
nt|suketbombi: he is likely to ruff  and play the @CT|pg||
nt|pelu: ruff, take @SA and play @C and West is ensplayed|pg||
nt|pelu: bridge is so easy when u see all 52 cards :)|pg||
nt|patricck: We've been seeing the same cards for quite a while now.........   hopefully we will see some action soon|pg||
nt|psyck: likely no more tricks in @c than in NT|pg||
pc|h9|nt|ralfwil: what are the best chances? enter dummy on @sA and play a small @h?|pg||
nt|fabsayc: small heart from hand trick 2 looks fine|pg||
pc|hT|pg||
nt|cenglund:  Mahaffey may discard a spade and then declarer will prevail|pg||
pc|hQ|nt|alok_daga: clubs,33,hrts 33,Spade K inside ,nv brd not wrth the risk|pg||
nt|geot: and the contract is two levels higher|pg||
pc|h6|nt|suketbombi: sure but he knows 2/1/5/5 with east|pg||
pc|s7|pc|cT|pg||
nt|cenglund:  Now it's -1|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: upps |pg||
nt|hawe45:  No push any longer|pg||
mc|8|nt|rmb1: @C finesse and @H finesse|pg||
nt|ady: re hi all   got disconnected|pg||
nt|rmb1: Not missed much - declarer edging his way towards his contract|pg||
nt|hawe45:  West has a weak-2 - and East will keep the @H´s|pg||
pg||
qx|o3|st||md|1SJT753H72DA87CK73,SQHK9653DQ92CT852,SK98HAT4DT4CAQJ94,SA642HQJ8DKJ653C6|sv|e|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or16runda1.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl  |pg||
nt|jr7: 4@S|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
mb|1N|mb|p|nt|santyclz: There are currently 8 vg tables running, to watch multiple tables:  www.bridgebase.com/mobile  Open 1 browser window/table.|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
mb|2H|an| |mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|santyclz: S might invite, depending on their nt range.|pg||
pc|c6|nt|jr7: 1NT shows what?|pg||
nt|jr7: I hope 15-17|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c2|pc|c4|pg||
pc|s3|pc|sQ|pc|sK|pc|sA|pg||
nt|santyclz: Could be 12-14, 14-16 or an upgraded 15-17 but in that case I would expect s to invite.|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h2|pc|h3|pc|hA|pg||
pc|s8|pc|s2|pc|s5|pc|h5|pg||
pc|s9|pc|s4|pc|sJ|mc|11|pg||
qx|c3|st||md|1SJT753H72DA87CK73,SQHK9653DQ92CT852,SK98HAT4DT4CAQJ94,SA642HQJ8DKJ653C6|sv|e|nt|mamos: 3Nt NS seems likely|pg||
nt|roswolf: meckwell in the other room|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Bridge is an easy game - defense not!|pg||
nt|cenglund:  He will establish a spade trick now|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: big swing 12 |pg||
nt|jameslee 2: miss fit for N-S reds againts -blacks |pg||
nt|jameslee 2: part score lets see where|pg||
nt|roswolf: the roof fell in|pg||
nt|xenya: small slip at the end for an extra undertrick|pg||
nt|roswolf: more bite here|pg||
nt|psyck: anyway, imps to the coffee promoters will make the match closer & more exciting for us|pg||
nt|hawe45:  OK|pg||
nt|mamos: defence has two more tricks|pg||
mb|p|nt|cenglund:  You could not imagine that he scored a trick in a side suit missing KQJ10|pg||
nt|pelu: a very nice board|pg||
mb|p|nt|kirp:  Precision @C by W|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: N/S can make 3@h and E/W can make 3@d, but need accurate play to make 3@H I think|pg||
nt|roswolf: indeed mike -straightforward bd|pg||
nt|psyck: oh, 3N did not make after all|pg||
mb|1N|nt|fann4: The OR (Open Room) in 4@S|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Easy game with @S Queen well placed|pg||
mb|p|nt|kirp:  3@H looks ambitious on 43|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: 1@d was suction|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: @H or @s and @c|pg||
nt|rmb1: According to their card, South could open 1NT,  not sure why he didn't|pg||
nt|roswolf: indeed and perhaps a share in the complimentary drink -p&p to the UK is the bore though:(|pg||
mb|2H|nt|oosmanb: 3@D probably for EW|pg||
nt|oosmanb: 3@h might be tricky|pg||
nt|alok_daga: 17 facing 14,a slam for the taking as cards fit.Doubt whether it will be bid|pg||
nt|fann4: E made a try and then stopped (he was facing a weak NT opening)|pg||
mb|p|nt|fabsayc: this 2@D is a new species, at least for me|pg||
nt|kirp:  curious to see how high EW get now|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Nobody will agree - but life is fantastic. if you open he North hand with 1 @C|pg||
mb|2S|nt|fann4: Similar situation now - not easy for E to drive to slam, though he has 7 controls, a doubleton and some good @D|pg||
nt|psyck: declarer played @h too early, before setting up @c's|pg||
mb|p|nt|ralfwil: 2@s on the way to 3@d?|pg||
nt|ady: bad diamond split may beat this|pg||
nt|roswolf: 2nt!?|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: other table meck made the 2@H with the sing 8@C lead |pg||
nt|roswolf: still 3 imps to the italians|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|jameslee 2: but here bidding to finishe |pg||
nt|cenglund:  Multi is a dangerous gadget - for both sides|pg||
nt|hawe45:  2 @S: I confirm my 5-card-suit...|pg||
nt|pelu: a veru poor opening, can NS stop in time?|pg||
nt|patricck: might be a thin opening, but it would have been a chunky pass :)|pg||
nt|suketbombi: agree peter|pg||
nt|pelu: Qx 2x are not good vcalues|pg||
pc|c6|nt|kirp:  E showed 5-7 hcp, so no strain on raise to 3@D|pg||
nt|oosmanb: this just needs @C Ace onside, (or Ax @S?)|pg||
nt|alok_daga: wud rank F&N as 1 of the best in business they not having a gud day in office|pg||
nt|pelu: and the opening suit not better|pg||
nt|mamos: cards lie very friendly for Spades|pg||
pc|cK|nt|rmb1: Loose one @D and ruff one, could be just one @D loser|pg||
nt|jbgood: he may lose to the king and ruff one - that would give 10|pg||
nt|ady: yes    will have to take care|pg||
nt|roswolf: 3nt looks certain|pg||
nt|roswolf: i assume the 1@S bid denied 4@H|pg||
nt|fann4: Only 11 tricks in NT|pg||
nt|alok_daga: the nt game playing IMPS is ridiculous|pg||
nt|patricck: sure, but the 10@D is a useful filler, I am not saying it is a clear opening, just that it is close to the borderline|pg||
nt|roswolf: alet off for norway|pg||
pc|c5|nt|jbgood: sry Robin - not a deliberate copy:)|pg||
nt|roswolf: this auction is very restrained|pg||
pc|c9|pg||
nt|psyck: indded, N managed to describe his hand at a low level|pg||
pc|sJ|nt|rmb1: Yes.  Not always true that 3 losers is 10 winners|pg||
pc|sQ|nt|jameslee 2: now hw has confirm the 5@C also :)|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Yes - at the 3-level...|pg||
pc|sK|nt|mamos:  So Diamonds are 3-3 and soon declarer wil smile|pg||
nt|roswolf: i think that the odds are on north only having 3|pg||
pc|s2|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: will find the A of @c and @s after 1@d, since 1@h was a freely bid|pg||
pc|s9|nt|fabsayc: this looks very good for NS, all games down and lots of values|pg||
pc|s4|nt|ralfwil: 9 tricks on any lead, so a nice stop|pg||
nt|mamos: declarer does have entry problems|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes but i fancy this making|pg||
pc|s3|nt|jameslee 2: not and easy spot to make 9 lets she what can happend |pg||
pc|h3|pg||
nt|pelu: no problem in opening on 11, but u sh have a good suit|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Claim|pg||
mc|11|nt|oosmanb: actually maybe it also needs A@S onside or @D 2-2, so you can get to 2nd @c trick|pg||
pg||
qx|o4|st||md|2ST75H5DT74C985432,SK8HQT92D862CKJT7,SQJ92HAKJ7DA53CAQ,SA643H8643DKQJ9C6|sv|b|nt|jr7: not 12-14 for sure :) -all too good!|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or16runda1.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
mb|p|nt|santyclz: I agree it was too good.|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
mb|2C|an| |mb|p|nt|jr7: 1 down in 2NT|pg||
mb|2N|an| |nt|santyclz: That must be a xfer to @cs.|pg||
mb|p|mb|3C|an| |mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|jr7: As I play 2NT = @C, and 3@C = @D|pg||
pc|dK|nt|santyclz: As I play it shows a balanced hand with 3 k's and out -- so much depends on system.|pg||
nt|jr7: ok - they did not play transfer - but vere asking for STOP if 2NT-hand - and YES :)|pg||
pc|d4|pc|d8|pc|dA|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h3|pc|h5|pc|h2|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h4|pc|d7|pc|h9|pg||
pc|h7|pc|h8|pc|c2|pc|hT|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c7|pc|cQ|pc|c6|pg||
pc|cA|pc|s3|pc|c4|pc|cT|pg||
pc|sJ|pc|s4|pc|s5|pc|sK|pg||
nt|jr7: sorry was sleeping! :)|pg||
pc|cK|pc|s2|nt|santyclz: The operation succeeded but the patient will die.|pg||
pc|s6|pc|c5|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|s9|pc|h6|pc|c8|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|hJ|pc|dQ|pc|c9|pg||
pc|s7|pc|s8|pc|sQ|pc|sA|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|dT|pc|d2|pc|d3|pg||
pc|d9|pc|sT|pc|d6|pc|d5|pg||
pg||
qx|c4|st||md|2ST75H5DT74C985432,SK8HQT92D862CKJT7,SQJ92HAKJ7DA53CAQ,SA643H8643DKQJ9C6|sv|b|nt|kirp:  Looks like a part score here|pg||
nt|cenglund:  Meckwell had a disaster in the OR|pg||
nt|fann4: Alok, I think your criticism is a bit strong - East knows they have 29-31 points between, so how risky is 3NT? I'd say virtually not at all.|pg||
nt|roswolf: a push|pg||
nt|mamos: so anothe rpush|pg||
mb|p|mb|2C!|nt|hawe45:  Easy defense against 6 @D |pg||
nt|roswolf: lots of points but not enough for a slam|pg||
mb|p|nt|STRIK3R: can make 3NT as the cards lay|pg||
nt|oosmanb: no stopping now|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: if guessing right in @h's|pg||
nt|ady: e/w can make 4@H   but fortunate |pg||
mb|2D|nt|rmb1: Can make 4@H if there is only 1 @H loser|pg||
nt|psyck: more or less on a finesse, likely will be bid|pg||
mb|p|nt|fabsayc: hardly recommended but brown would have done well to balance with double|pg||
mb|2N|nt|ady: will hav e to drop honor doubleton heart in north hand   and bring in 5 club tricks|pg||
nt|rmb1: X from East?  4@C seems too much|pg||
nt|roswolf: @S partial|pg||
nt|hawe45:  I mean: 6 @S|pg||
nt|alok_daga: the fact that the spade suit does not cum into the frame,I found objectionable|pg||
mb|p|nt|kirp:  14-16 hcp, 3@C is simple Stayman|pg||
nt|cenglund:  Yes, because there is not way of pitching the losing diamonds|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: 3@C = singleton @C not in the goos spot for N|pg||
nt|hawe45:  6 @H...|pg||
nt|cenglund:  Meck hates to bid bad slams, but he did not follow his principle on this one|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: very dificult not to bid 6@H here |pg||
nt|hawe45:  Cue-bids might be invented these days|pg||
nt|cenglund:  RKCB is not the answer|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: but on info controls could be a good stop from N-S lets see |pg||
nt|hawe45:  South has bad values in the side-suits|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: he could bid it directly or not |pg||
nt|jameslee 2: long think |pg||
nt|cenglund:  I suppose 3C shows minimum|pg||
nt|fann4: Slam is on here for NS, but the @SKQx opposite shortage looks wasted to South.|pg||
nt|fann4: This can go for 800 in 4@Sx|pg||
nt|fann4: Note E did not enter the auction in the OR|pg||
nt|alok_daga: but AQ10xx,shud appeal when partner splinters|pg||
nt|fann4: NS are clearly in a forcing situation, so S may pass.|pg||
nt|fann4: In which case N will likely press on.|pg||
nt|alok_daga: Pass?his strength yet undisclosed|pg||
nt|fann4: S hates @SKQx for offense, but dbl may be a little premature|pg||
nt|fann4: Alok, 3@S is a splinter, forcing to game.|pg||
nt|alok_daga: 1hrt may be 6,he has 14|pg||
nt|bagman: Hi all|pg||
nt|alok_daga: Hi|pg||
nt|fann4: Hi and welcome Pekka|pg||
nt|patricck: should be a flat board|pg||
mb|p|nt|mamos: Dbl =?|pg||
nt|suketbombi: flat board here 1@H & 2@CS to loose|pg||
nt|roswolf: 6@C would make on a good day|pg||
nt|psyck: 4333 & max 32 hcp, so E took the low road|pg||
nt|roswolf: but no enterprise from the italians|pg||
mb|p|nt|hawe45:  This was the solution - now 4 @H and that´s it|pg||
nt|cenglund:  Now he cant cue bid 4D|pg||
nt|hawe45:  If he does, he might make the slam...!|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: let,s see if S can help N to bid the good contract |pg||
nt|pelu: the runnings scores are yet not running, but I am sure that the polish IT-staff is working hard|pg||
nt|mamos: 2@d either weak @d or 20+ art|pg||
pc|dK|nt|mamos: so North shows balanced hand|pg||
pc|d4|nt|jbgood: stole it|pg||
nt|ady: needs a club switch now|pg||
nt|mamos: South squeezed out of auction|pg||
nt|cenglund:  Provided that 4C was not a query of some kind|pg||
nt|bagman: If memory servers; greco hampson play meckwell type precision where North was limited|pg||
pc|d8|nt|ralfwil: not the best defence. Either a @d lead or continue with @s|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: @c lead ?|pg||
nt|roswolf: hmm not easy to pick that contract|pg||
pc|d5|pg||
nt|kirp:  3N is fairly lucky to make, 3@C could be 5 CMS looking at 3@S bid to show 4@Hs|pg||
nt|oosmanb: can he play on @C instead of @H ?|pg||
nt|kirp:  W showed @S if any 4 crd major, so @S lead is not best usually|pg||
pc|dQ|nt|cenglund:  They are heading for same destination|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: there they go to 6@H|pg||
nt|pelu: there could come 11 tricks|pg||
pc|d7|pc|d2|pc|d3|pg||
nt|kirp:  may play on @Hs |pg||
nt|hawe45:  I hate to - but have to! - syt it: POOR BIDDING AT BOTH TABLES|pg||
nt|hawe45:  say it|pg||
nt|cenglund:  I don't think that this slam is unavoidable|pg||
nt|pelu: no more|pg||
pc|dJ|nt|roswolf: i want to bid|pg||
pc|dT|pc|d6|nt|ralfwil: this is what happened!|pg||
pc|dA|pg||
nt|kirp:  small @H best now, but @D finesse works|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: considering his middelcards in @c, playing one round on @h's was more attempting, needed to try @c's if first @h failed?|pg||
nt|oosmanb: Team Angelini picked up more imps in board 2 when the other room bid 3NT instead of 3@D|pg||
nt|kirp:  ad hope NY couldn't take 3@Hs and 2@Cs|pg||
nt|oosmanb: a fair punt, but didnt work out|pg||
nt|oosmanb: yes, I guess J@H onside is higher %age than @C 3-3? |pg||
nt|kirp:  3@S lead certainly gave defense little chance to figure out what to do|pg||
nt|kirp:  if @H J is onside, then has time to test @Cs and if not 33, then @Ds|pg||
nt|kirp:  @D finesse|pg||
nt|oosmanb: Doesnt he need @d finesse in any case? |pg||
nt|hawe45:  They are "buried" in their conventions!|pg||
nt|mamos: 2Nt will be "less bad " than 3@c I think|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s3|pc|s5|nt|fann4: Yes, I think they play a lot of Meckwell stuff.|pg||
nt|roswolf: 11 tricks look the max|pg||
pc|sK|pg||
nt|cenglund:  Both N-S pairs thought that it's a big minus|pg||
pc|hT|pc|hK|nt|jbgood: needed to safety play diamonds to win|pg||
pc|h3|nt|fabsayc: likely not much difference here since NS on for 4@S|pg||
nt|kirp:  still only 8 trix with J@H onside|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: need to get 3@d tricks, so @d finesse is very much needed|pg||
nt|kirp:  S should have continued @Hs ,then needed @D finesse|pg||
pc|h5|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Might make 120 = 8 IMP´s|pg||
pc|s2|nt|jameslee 2: we,ll after all (no score)  we shall keep 12-12|pg||
pc|sA|nt|ady: now has to drop doubleton A@S eith east    play towards K@S    then drop ace 2nd round|pg||
nt|jbgood: still 1 down may be cheap|pg||
pc|s7|nt|kirp:  another pickup for EW, as they played 1N in OR|pg||
nt|cenglund:  A pleasent surprise is waiting for them|pg||
nt|psyck: tuf to find minor 44 fit after 2N opening & 6NT is not a good slam unlike 6@c, so sensible by E to not try I suppose|pg||
pc|s8|pg||
nt|oosmanb: Full 10 imps on offering here|pg||
pc|d9|nt|kirp:  duck this to set up count for end position|pg||
pc|c2|nt|ady: but still down 1|pg||
nt|alok_daga: Greco had a problem,5hrts I found the least of all evils|pg||
pc|c7|pc|h7|pg||
nt|hawe45:  North needes the @H-finesse earlier - now trouble with @S back|pg||
nt|hawe45:  needed|pg||
mc|8|nt|rmb1: Exit in @C|pg||
pg||
qx|o5|st||md|3SJ98654HQT7DCAQJ7,ST3HK843DAJ96C542,SKHAJ95D8543CT863,SAQ72H62DKQT72CK9|sv|n|nt|vugraphpl2: :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or16runda1.html|pg||
mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl  |pg||
mb|1D|nt|santyclz: Welcome back Jorgen, did you bring the coffee?|pg||
nt|jr7: 4@S |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
mb|1S|mb|d|mb|p|mb|1N|nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
mb|p|mb|2D|mb|p|nt|santyclz: 4@s?  Too rich for my blood.|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|jr7: but they can never reach 4@S :) - and @D will kill the contrakt|pg||
pc|s8|pc|sT|pc|sK|pc|sA|pg||
pc|d2|pc|s4|pc|dJ|pc|d3|pg||
pc|s3|nt|santyclz: Nice, peaceful 2@d contract which is likely to make in spite of the break.|pg||
pc|c8|pc|sQ|pc|s5|pg||
pc|s2|pc|s6|pc|d9|pc|c3|pg||
pc|d6|pc|d4|pc|d7|pc|c7|pg||
pc|s7|pc|s9|pc|dA|pc|h5|pg||
pc|c2|pc|cT|pc|cK|pc|cA|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|c4|pc|c6|pc|c9|pg||
nt|santyclz: Looks as if +1 since n didn't ruff the 2nd @s.|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|c5|pc|h9|pc|dT|pg||
pc|dK|pc|h7|pc|h3|pc|d5|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|sJ|pc|h4|pc|d8|pg||
pc|h2|pc|hT|pc|h8|pc|hJ|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h6|pc|hQ|pc|hK|pg||
pg||
qx|c5|st||md|3SJ98654HQT7DCAQJ7,ST3HK843DAJ96C542,SKHAJ95D8543CT863,SAQ72H62DKQT72CK9|sv|n|nt|oosmanb: Yes excellent play|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: reviewed board 1, N/S play transfer after 1@c opening|pg||
nt|roswolf: 6@S is a sporting contract|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Here you must insist on two @S-losers NOT to make 4 @S|pg||
nt|alok_daga: with Qx,Jxx what does he cue?|pg||
nt|roswolf: only 10 5ricks made in the other room -an imp closer|pg||
nt|roswolf: tricks|pg||
nt|hawe45:  He did´nt|pg||
nt|mamos: 2NT will be the most common contract  I was going to say most popular  but most North's won't like it|pg||
mb|p|nt|ady: 4@H  was bid and made in OR   so poor result for Netherlands|pg||
nt|mamos: which sport is that Geoff|pg||
nt|hawe45:  11 tricks possible|pg||
mb|1D|nt|fabsayc: 4nt?|pg||
nt|ralfwil: first slam 6@d or 6@c|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: so 1@h from South now, showing 4+@s|pg||
nt|patricck: NS make 10 tricks in @H and EW can make 9 tricks as a sacrifice in @D |pg||
mb|1S|mb|d|nt|rmb1: Convention card I have says 2H natural|pg||
nt|jbgood: a direct 3 NT or via 3@h?|pg||
nt|roswolf: not bridge:)|pg||
mb|r|nt|fabsayc: i dont like double|pg||
nt|ralfwil: agree|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: 1@s from north show 3-5 @s's they open 1@c with weak hands with 5-5 in @c and @s|pg||
nt|patricck: or 8 tricks sacrificing in spades, same score|pg||
nt|roswolf: some e/w partscore now|pg||
mb|2N|nt|jbgood: transfers first|pg||
mb|p|nt|kirp:  2@S can buy the hand now|pg||
nt|mamos: do we know what North's rdbl was?  |pg||
nt|hawe45:  Yes = @S honor|pg||
mb|3N|nt|bagman: S is happy to pass this as i would guess that 2@H denies 3 or more spades|pg||
mb|p|nt|fann4: 1 off on the bad trump break.|pg||
nt|alok_daga: where does the 8th trick cum from?5hrts+2 dmnds|pg||
nt|bagman: Declarer is likely to play the @DJ from dummy after winning @HK hoping to be able to get a spade or a diamond later|pg||
nt|fann4: There is no 8th trick - he will lose 3@C tricks.|pg||
nt|fann4: Now that he is going to be deprived of a @C ruff he should probably win in hand and play a @S up to the K|pg||
nt|mamos: That won't help S much who has such a poor suit|pg||
mb|p|nt|ralfwil: W is very happy now|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: 2@s confirm the 5th @s|pg||
nt|kirp:  Surprised that W did not act over 1@H|pg||
nt|mamos: South is going to have a peek I'd guess|pg||
nt|roswolf: a diamond lead would give it|pg||
nt|mamos: it won't be a surprise if they bid it|pg||
mb|p|nt|mamos: but declarer has only seven tricks |pg||
pc|s8|nt|jbgood: same contract we would all have ended up in|pg||
nt|hawe45:  5 on a @H-lead only|pg||
nt|mamos: EW seem to have some misunderstanding here|pg||
nt|hawe45:  2 NT looks strange to me|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Why lead the 8, when partner has a @S-picture|pg||
nt|hawe45:  But their captain just told me, that E/W play strong @C|pg||
pc|s3|pc|sK|pc|sA|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: diferent bid other table 3@S here 2nt to end in 3nt |pg||
nt|bagman: Declarer's main hope is to score 6 hearts and 2 diamonds; with hearts 4-1 he needs something nice to happen |pg||
nt|suketbombi: chaance to make now|pg||
nt|patricck: yes, a @C ruff was possible|pg||
pc|dK|nt|jameslee 2: x@H lead could come from S |pg||
nt|alok_daga: played xledummy it will make|pg||
nt|fann4: You are wrong. It cannot make.|pg||
nt|suketbombi: he can finese the @Ds and make|pg||
nt|pelu: same start in Or also here East ducked @h10 - and then @H to A and @D finess|pg||
pc|s4|nt|patricck: In the other room East ducked a trump to get a signal, but when West showed out on the 2nd heart declarer finessed the diamond|pg||
pc|d6|pc|d3|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: not much comunication for the 2 @S finesse required |pg||
nt|jameslee 2: K@C play could duck by S |pg||
nt|bagman: East needs to play a spade in some point to prevent @S-@D strip squeeze; if the defense cashes their 4 tricks and fail to play a spade, W is strip squeezed|pg||
nt|fann4: And easy to see - losing 1 trump, 1@S, 3@C and @DK|pg||
nt|roswolf: this looks horrible|pg||
pc|d2|nt|mamos: they have lots oif controls |pg||
nt|roswolf: indeed game on|pg||
nt|mamos: declarer still has some hopes of success   |pg||
nt|hawe45:  Difficult for South to find five discards|pg||
pc|s5|nt|fabsayc: reminder to east: keep all those hearts, all winners|pg||
nt|oosmanb: This will be over in a flash|pg||
pc|dA|nt|pelu: strange that bort East plæayers gave N a 2. chancxe to make|pg||
pc|d4|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: no sill stuck upp in dummy j@C-A@C |pg||
pc|d9|nt|psyck: getting better now :)|pg||
nt|roswolf: less horrible now|pg||
pc|d5|nt|ady: takes early trump leads to beat 4@H by e/w more than 1 trick|pg||
pc|dT|nt|bagman: Having cashed the spade, the defense should take the clubs and lock declarer to his hand|pg||
nt|hawe45:  But North MUST have @H Ace - otherwise 9 tricks|pg||
pc|h7|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: what can E play for now ?|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: Kx@S ?|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: jx@S ?|pg||
nt|cenglund:  No you can't missguess the spades|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: has to decide how to move the @S |pg||
nt|jameslee 2: x@S to the 9@S |pg||
pc|h2|nt|bagman: If they fail to do that, they have to be careful in the endgame|pg||
pc|hT|pc|hK|nt|patricck: yes, there wasn't any doubt about which suit to switch to|pg||
pc|hA|pg||
pc|c6|pc|c9|nt|mamos: ouch|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|c2|pg||
nt|cenglund:  Now he is down|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: upps can loss 3 more tricks  with x@H back|pg||
pc|sJ|nt|cenglund:  Excellent score for the team Apteker|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: this is Bridge when one has a few options can go rong :)|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Both of them (East and West) might have bid better. East has no hand for NT-play, and West never showed the 6th @S|pg||
nt|cenglund:  They bid the more sensible 4S in the OR making|pg||
nt|fann4: The defence would have to mess this up really badly to end play themselves.|pg||
nt|roswolf: a bad cardplay error from north|pg||
pc|sT|nt|jbgood: dont think many try 4@h vuln|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: yes absolutly true |pg||
pc|d8|pc|sQ|pg||
pc|dQ|nt|ady: yes agree|pg||
nt|mamos: un ouch:)|pg||
pc|s6|nt|bagman: Now the defense must take care that they don't let W get endplayed and don't set up a club|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|h5|pg||
nt|bagman: Now it's tough for Jens Auken|pg||
pc|d7|nt|jameslee 2: 4@S its a much more better contract then 3NT|pg||
pc|c7|pc|h3|pc|c3|pg||
pc|s2|nt|mamos: I think that this will be at lots and lots of tables Geoff |pg||
pc|s9|pc|h4|pc|c8|pg||
pc|cA|nt|mamos: so predict flat |pg||
pc|c4|nt|alok_daga: wd|pg||
nt|fann4: You saw the dangers coming, Pekka|pg||
pc|cT|nt|roswolf: indeed a slightly less than a 50% slam|pg||
pc|cK|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|c5|pc|h9|pc|h6|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h8|pc|hJ|pc|s7|pg||
pg||
qx|o6|st||md|4SA8HQ9652DA98CQ63,SKQ92HAK8DT4CK754,ST654HT7DKJ72CJ92,SJ73HJ43DQ653CAT8|sv|e|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or16runda1.html|pg||
mb|p|nt|santyclz: 2nt made although it might have been beaten on the hand n played 3@c-2 for an 8 imp swing.|pg||
mb|1H|mb|d|nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
nt|santyclz: If you hover your mouse over the team score, a pop-up shows the imp scale.|pg||
mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: :)|pg||
pc|h2|nt|santyclz: I'm told that doesn't work with the browser version.|pg||
pc|h8|pc|h7|pc|hJ|pg||
pc|s3|pc|s8|pc|sK|pc|s4|pg||
pc|s2|pc|s6|pc|sJ|pc|sA|pg||
nt|jr7: 1@S is absolut the best bid, hi nows Vest have 4 @S - normaly :)|pg||
pc|h5|pc|hK|pc|hT|pc|h3|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s5|pc|s7|pc|h6|pg||
nt|santyclz: And most of the time when he doesn't, he has another bid to take.|pg||
pc|hA|nt|jr7: When NS shal play@D - it must be @DJ as the first card|pg||
pc|c9|pc|h4|pc|h9|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c2|pc|cA|pc|c3|pg||
pc|cT|pc|c6|pc|cK|pc|cJ|pg||
pc|c5|pc|d2|pc|c8|pc|cQ|pg||
pc|d8|pc|d4|pc|dK|pc|d3|pg||
pc|sT|pc|d5|pc|d9|pc|s9|pg||
pc|d7|pc|d6|pc|dA|pc|dT|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|c7|pc|dJ|pc|dQ|pg||
nt|jr7: :(|pg||
nt|jr7: J I said :)|pg||
pg||
qx|c6|st||md|4SA8HQ9652DA98CQ63,SKQ92HAK8DT4CK754,ST654HT7DKJ72CJ92,SJ73HJ43DQ653CAT8|sv|e|nt|STRIK3R: interesting bidding problem for west now, if it goes 1@d, and 2@d from South to show @s and a sidesuite|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: 10 |pg||
nt|bagman: West should have discard the @SA because the !Q was not covered so E had the @SJ left|pg||
nt|bagman: @SQ|pg||
nt|alok_daga: a likely push,|pg||
nt|patricck: It couldn't be @D, you can see those in dummy|pg||
nt|pelu: 12 IMP after mistake in defense and then in play|pg||
nt|roswolf: that will cost|pg||
nt|roswolf: a tempter for n/s|pg||
nt|psyck: they got to a strange contract other room last deal, likely the bidding was not completely entered|pg||
mb|p|nt|hawe45:  Suppose West opens 1 @H - would 5 @D be the bid?|pg||
nt|cenglund:  The level of bridge seen so far has been rather poor and not what we had expected|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: has 4@H could wait |pg||
mb|1H|nt|jbgood: so 3 teams go to the A Swiss and the others to B. Then 27 from A and 5 from B go to the KO rounds|pg||
nt|ady: part score hand|pg||
nt|jbgood: no carry overs|pg||
nt|ady: 2@H  about the limit for n/s|pg||
nt|rmb1: Might try 4@S would make if @SKx onside|pg||
mb|d|nt|oosmanb: Fun hand now|pg||
nt|hawe45:  At the other table only 3 @D - too friendly|pg||
nt|fann4: They could miss it now|pg||
nt|fann4: But vul N must be tempted to do something.|pg||
mb|p|mb|2D|nt|kirp:  3@H by NS should be the limit, not successfully either|pg||
nt|jbgood: running scores: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda6.html|pg||
nt|roswolf: muiderberg it looks like|pg||
nt|mamos: lightning pace at this table|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: 5@S same spot |pg||
nt|alok_daga: now the excitement starts with a unnatural 2hrts|pg||
nt|fann4: Shows you!|pg||
nt|fann4: 2@H wasn't unnatural - it was a weak 2.|pg||
mb|p|nt|oosmanb: Well North's initial pass|pg||
nt|oosmanb: has put an upper limit I think|pg||
nt|kirp:  gives W a problem, tho' strong@C system helps|pg||
nt|kirp:  W knows NS have 8+@Hs ,|pg||
nt|fann4: Maybe not everyone's choice, with A109xxx.|pg||
nt|suketbombi: yes the @H duck was strang apparently happened on other tables too|pg||
nt|pelu: but again easy for us|pg||
mb|p|nt|ady: yes    the hand belongs to e/w    but 9 tricks the limit|pg||
mb|p|nt|STRIK3R: 8@hs I would say, x from east should show 4@h?|pg||
nt|kirp:  2N is some form of Lebensohl, compete in a minor|pg||
nt|oosmanb: Yes seems like it|pg||
pc|sA|nt|kirp:  but not as clear in this sequence|pg||
nt|roswolf: difficult call here|pg||
nt|mamos: East's hand seems enormous for this treatment but what do I know|pg||
nt|roswolf: mild slam try showing short spades no doubt|pg||
pc|s2|nt|fabsayc: lead critical|pg||
nt|ady: n/s well overboard|pg||
nt|psyck: S making a slam try showing the @h suit & @s shortness, N will signoff with balanced minimum|pg||
pc|s4|nt|fabsayc: no diamond lead makes south huge favorite to hold spade queen|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: 5@S on the K@C placed|pg||
pc|s3|pg||
nt|kirp:  good stop|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: indeed|pg||
nt|suketbombi: yes:)|pg||
nt|suketbombi: a passive defence here is in order  @D being frozen suit|pg||
nt|patricck: looks like 4 losers|pg||
pc|s8|nt|rmb1: Its only -1 |pg||
nt|roswolf: and a club switch to follow|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: spec gives me a 6@D cool contract comment |pg||
nt|bagman: In the 2nd position the preempt should be quite pure as there's sort of 50-50 chance that the good cards are held by the partner|pg||
pc|s9|nt|suketbombi: yes unless defence opens up @DS|pg||
nt|pelu: down 1 as long as NS dont play @D|pg||
nt|roswolf: north co-operates - this auction needs to slow down|pg||
pc|sT|nt|ady: 200 to Netherlands    could only make 140     east with defensive values  might have doubled 4@H|pg||
nt|hawe45:  And with 400 in 5 @D|pg||
nt|hawe45:  No - East ducks the first @C for sure|pg||
nt|fann4: So 10 imps probably to DEN|pg||
pc|sJ|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: true only 1 discard for the 4th @H not enough for 12 @D|pg||
nt|fann4: Who will have built up a good lead.|pg||
nt|alok_daga: Marty Bergen says AQJ10xx&Jxxx of the OM 2 start a weak 2 here the suit also bad |pg||
nt|xenya: but even 4@H is too high on a @C lead|pg||
nt|roswolf: yup but normal|pg||
pc|d3|nt|mamos: maybe a little lucky that there was a Spade to cash|pg||
nt|roswolf: these top players dont go wrong in the play of these hands|pg||
nt|roswolf: a great result for mahaffey|pg||
pc|d9|pc|dT|nt|ralfwil: -1 now. 2@d 2@h and one trumph|pg||
nt|ady: may only be down 1    need to take club ruff|pg||
nt|cenglund:  A heart continuation would been fatal|pg||
nt|hawe45:  But with some endplay-position, which makes|pg||
nt|cenglund:  No endplay any more, whatever is the shift|pg||
pc|dJ|pg||
nt|mamos: West has a difficult choice over 1@h  here   some might bid 1NT  some x as here some Pass|pg||
pc|s5|pc|s7|nt|cenglund:  3 IMPs to Apteker|pg||
pc|d8|nt|ady: though if they take club ruff  then diamond trick goes|pg||
nt|ady: so down 1 it is|pg||
pc|sQ|pg||
nt|suketbombi:  two rds of @C now and @H A and back:)|pg||
nt|suketbombi: now he did open up @DS|pg||
nt|pelu: 4@H only need @H or @DA right - almost a 75%|pg||
nt|mamos: East chose 1@S rather than 2@d in the OR|pg||
nt|hawe45:  South might take the @D Ace before the @C-shift, will work fine here|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c4|pc|cJ|nt|ady: so the 4@H bid saved an imp|pg||
nt|psyck: on a good day, N would have Axxx Axx Ajx QJx or something & 6@h would have play|pg||
pc|cA|pg||
nt|kirp:  that settles for 3@D making|pg||
nt|roswolf: today is a bad day:(|pg||
nt|psyck: another swing unexpectedly with @dJ lead in OR same contract|pg||
nt|roswolf: the bidding helped to pinpoint the club lead|pg||
pc|d5|nt|bagman: There were 3 unpurities in S hand: weak hearts, side 4 card major and singleton K|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d4|pc|d2|pg||
nt|psyck: bidding same or except 3N instead of 4@d|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|cK|pc|c2|pc|c8|pg||
pc|c5|pc|c9|pc|cT|pc|c6|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h2|nt|fabsayc: i might still be thinking about running the spade trick 1, still the actual layout was much as you should expect|pg||
nt|ralfwil: can we get running scores?|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h7|pg||
pc|hK|pc|hT|nt|roswolf: trying for a squeeze|pg||
pc|h4|pc|h5|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s6|pc|hJ|pc|h6|pg||
pc|c7|pc|d7|pc|dQ|pc|h9|pg||
pc|d6|pc|hQ|pc|h8|pc|dK|pg||
nt|mamos: well done|pg||
pg||
qx|o7|st||md|1SKT6HK8742DAK4CQ6,SJ2HAQT965D72CT73,SA54HJ3DJ653CAKJ9,SQ9873HDQT98C8542|sv|b|mb|1N|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or16runda1.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins |pg||
pc|hT|nt|jr7: easy 9 tricks|pg||
pc|h3|pc|c8|pc|hK|pg||
nt|jr7: Who got 87 ?|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|c7|pc|c9|pc|c2|pg||
pc|c6|pc|c3|pc|cJ|pc|c4|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c5|nt|jr7: WHY not J ?|pg||
pc|d4|pc|cT|pg||
pc|cA|nt|santyclz: Seems strange to me.|pg||
pc|s9|pc|s6|pc|h5|pg||
nt|jr7: 0%|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d8|pc|dK|pc|d2|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d7|pc|d5|pc|d9|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s2|pc|s4|pc|s3|pg||
pc|sT|pc|sJ|pc|sA|pc|s7|pg||
mc|10|pg||
qx|c7|st||md|1SKT6HK8742DAK4CQ6,SJ2HAQT965D72CT73,SA54HJ3DJ653CAKJ9,SQ9873HDQT98C8542|sv|b|nt|oosmanb: Well done another optimal contract played by EW|pg||
nt|mamos: wild hand |pg||
nt|mamos: s|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Another IMP possible here for Apteker|pg||
nt|fann4: These days most experts prefer to open a weak 2 with a side 4 card major, if it's not too good a suit.|pg||
nt|pelu: what a gift|pg||
nt|suketbombi: yes true + this defence if both wrong|pg||
nt|pelu: so 76% :) I will only give 1% for misdefense|pg||
nt|xenya: good try but a new leader|pg||
nt|roswolf: strange lead in the other room -so the lead changes hands again|pg||
nt|mamos: The boards so far have been scrappy |pg||
mb|1N|nt|rmb1: Again EW might try 4@S|pg||
nt|fann4: But I far preferred the pass made at the other table.|pg||
mb|2D!|nt|psyck: looks like 3N down on @s lead here, if it can be found|pg||
nt|roswolf: 3nt is solid even though i suspect an upgrade from north|pg||
mb|d!|mb|r|mb|p|nt|oosmanb: Any endplays possible for 10th trick in 4@H? |pg||
nt|mamos: there could be blood spilt here|pg||
mb|2H|nt|oosmanb: I doubt it, so NS would do well to stop below game|pg||
nt|rmb1: 1@C was 16+ artificial|pg||
nt|fann4: Wow - a disaster for EW in the CR, ending up in 4@H in a 5-1 fit.|pg||
nt|geot: Only the mentioned spade lead is a problem|pg||
mb|p|nt|fabsayc: 61% for NS on board 6, nobody made 3@C|pg||
nt|oosmanb: but with a 10 card fit, vulnerable, can Fjaelberg put the brakes on |pg||
nt|kirp:  4@H can make if W does not switch to @S when in with the A@C|pg||
mb|p|nt|oosmanb: How? even if @C are stripped East has 4th @d to exit?|pg||
nt|kirp:  8@S|pg||
nt|patricck: more than 1% chance for a misdefence because it could be the opening lead that gives it away. After that has been survived very unlikely the defence will slip,|pg||
nt|roswolf: this will now power home|pg||
nt|psyck: yes, likely an upgrade with a decent 6 carder|pg||
mb|d|nt|oosmanb: Ah right, |pg||
nt|jbgood: guess X shows 4-5+ spades?|pg||
nt|ady: down 1  would sedem unless a slip|pg||
nt|rmb1: 1C-P-1H = S so I guess this X is a transfer to S as well|pg||
nt|mamos: surely 4@h now|pg||
nt|cenglund:  A less interesting board |pg||
nt|hawe45:  Overtrick is easy: 2 x @H - and a SMALL @D|pg||
nt|xenya: the 1N opening seems to have worked well here|pg||
mb|p|nt|oosmanb: Well spotted Martin|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: might get to 4 now|pg||
nt|alok_daga: Fantoni,Nunes reach a 4hrts on a 5 1 suit,miss their 5 3 fit,a off day for them|pg||
nt|roswolf: indeed|pg||
mb|p|nt|jbgood: S could never hope to buy the contract in @hs - so perhaps xx in stead of 2 @h to indicate a high @h honor might have worked better|pg||
nt|cenglund:  That's what happened in the OR|pg||
mb|p|nt|oosmanb: So yes important for West to break up endplay, and he will too, has 1@S bid to help him|pg||
nt|kirp:  I said 'can make', timing and defense needed to help|pg||
pc|cA|nt|bagman: E knows that W has short hearts and might even hope a heart lead|pg||
pc|c2|nt|alok_daga: Assume pp 1sp p 2nt=4trumps+a stiff.AKx treated as a 4card in the OR|pg||
nt|fann4: In my book, the W hand is just a 2@S raise over 1@S|pg||
nt|bagman: Here declarer can cash the @HA and cross ruff 8 additional trump tricks|pg||
nt|bagman: Easy 9 tricks|pg||
nt|fann4: Can one make 10 tricks on the layout?|pg||
nt|bagman: GIB can but E's going to cash his easy 9 :)|pg||
nt|fann4: Yes|pg||
nt|psyck: W got his @s's into the bidding other room, so a swing likely|pg||
pc|c6|nt|hawe45:  South can see 23 HCP - so not much for an entry in North|pg||
nt|pelu: now running score is up : http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or32runda1.html|pg||
pc|c3|pg||
nt|mamos: 4 off?|pg||
pc|sA|nt|jbgood: see?|pg||
nt|xenya: suppose N opens 1@C, 1@D from S -- and W overcalls 11S|pg||
pc|s3|nt|kirp:  I would guess it unlikely to make, knowing EW is very sound on all aspects of game|pg||
nt|xenya: 1@S*|pg||
pc|s6|nt|hawe45:  If North has given count, no sense for a small @D|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: looking for  an imposible @H ruff underlead from AK@D |pg||
nt|hawe45:  ??? Shall these two teams play in the next round (18.30...)|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: still Q@D on the other side E no more @H can ruff Hi |pg||
nt|suketbombi: dummy is a real dummy here|pg||
pc|s2|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: what line is the best from norths point of view?|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Should we say it this way: West was MINIMUM for his 2 @H...|pg||
pc|s5|pc|s7|nt|vugraphpl7: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/mxp/fa.html|pg||
nt|psyck: it was not too late for @s shift after winning @c either|pg||
nt|psyck: as has @hA entrtyto play @s again|pg||
nt|geot: And why should East find that? The bidding worked find for N/S.|pg||
pc|sK|nt|psyck: true|pg||
pc|sJ|pg||
nt|oosmanb: Draw @Hs, K@D ruff a @D, and @c up?|pg||
nt|kirp:  good nes and bad news, finesse works, 30 trumps is bad|pg||
nt|mamos: East probably pleased he didnt have to play this hand :)|pg||
pc|dK|nt|ady: e/w do well in hearts and could make 10 tricks if clubs not played early|pg||
nt|jbgood: much easier to defent if N knows about the heart king with prd |pg||
pc|d2|pc|d5|nt|fabsayc: non spade lead was a disaster for EW here, but can salvage with heart return knocking out north entry|pg||
pc|d8|pg||
nt|hawe45:  By playin the @H-suit correctly, West will save 300 - from the 1400|pg||
pc|dA|nt|mamos: well done|pg||
pc|d7|pc|d3|nt|mamos: Board 5 (6@S-1)  was indeed flat|pg||
pc|d9|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|c7|pc|cK|pc|c4|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|c5|pc|d4|nt|suketbombi: declerar will be pleased to get his @D trick in the end:)|pg||
pc|cT|pg||
pc|s4|nt|STRIK3R: Jans, tried another 3N on board 6, so antoher 6 IMPs to Angelini|pg||
nt|oosmanb: must keep @D for 2nd exit, and exit @C now, right?|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|sT|pc|h5|pg||
nt|hawe45:  There is only one play for the trumps, King doubleton brings nothing|pg||
pc|hT|pc|hJ|nt|mamos: nothing works here|pg||
pc|s8|pc|h2|pg||
pc|h3|pc|c8|pc|h7|pc|h9|pg||
nt|chessmaste: Declarer does best to leave diamonds well alone. If he plays three rounds of hearts, then I think East may have to find (and it would be brilliant to do so) the discard of a top ...|pg||
nt|chessmaste: club |pg||
pc|h6|pc|d6|pc|dT|pc|h8|pg||
pc|h4|pc|hQ|pc|c9|pc|dQ|pg||
pc|hA|pc|dJ|pc|s9|pc|hK|pg||
pg||
qx|o8|st||md|2ST93HT87DAJ85CAJ2,SAKHQ943DK7C98543,SQ764HAK2DQT943C7,SJ852HJ65D62CKQT6|sv|o|nt|vugraphpl2: i don't know, i vugraph only :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: we must wait for North, because he left us...|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: so we have a little break now :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: in this break you can read what happens in Poznan in  bulletins at www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins |pg||
mb|1C|nt|vugraphpl2: or read some information at www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
mb|d|mb|1S|nt|santyclz: Or Jorgen can entertain us with arias from Das Fleidermaus.|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: or see running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or16runda1.html|pg||
mb|1N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|2C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|2D|mb|p|mb|p|mb|3C|mb|p|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|jr7: nice fight :)|pg||
pc|cK|nt|vugraphpl2: :)|pg||
nt|jr7: 2 @S 1@D 1@H = 9-4|pg||
nt|santyclz: Seems to make 2@cs or 3@ds.|pg||
nt|jr7: maybee 0@H|pg||
nt|jr7: I knows @DK is in Vest - just play @D|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c3|pc|c7|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d7|pc|d3|pc|d2|pg||
pc|s3|pc|sK|pc|s4|pc|s2|pg||
pc|h3|pc|hA|pc|h6|pc|h7|pg||
pc|d9|pc|d6|pc|d5|pc|dK|pg||
pc|h4|pc|hK|pc|h5|pc|h8|pg||
pc|h2|pc|hJ|pc|hT|pc|hQ|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s6|pc|s5|pc|s9|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|c8|st||md|2ST93HT87DAJ85CAJ2,SAKHQ943DK7C98543,SQ764HAK2DQT943C7,SJ852HJ65D62CKQT6|sv|o|nt|fabsayc: so board punted back and forth|pg||
nt|kirp:  EW juggernaut continues on bd 6, |pg||
nt|chessmaste: The point is that West must get in twice to lead spades through|pg||
nt|oosmanb: Good point Mark|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: other table playing fast playing the last hand |pg||
nt|fann4: 3@D looks pretty flat|pg||
nt|psyck: but W did clearly ask for @s on the @c's|pg||
nt|roswolf: a lot of mistakes in this match - makes for a rollercoaster ride|pg||
nt|geot: to late with the heart lead, declarer can set up 2 hearts and a total of nine|pg||
nt|roswolf: here a pretty fair slam |pg||
nt|psyck: he could, but he chose to play @c 1st for some reason, a Grosvenor :)|pg||
nt|geot: what is best here, 6D or 6H|pg||
mb|1D|nt|mamos: 4 of a major here|pg||
mb|p|nt|fabsayc: after second club ducked north almost certainly should unblock diamonds|pg||
nt|hawe45:  So half of the teams play next round|pg||
nt|bagman: Even though the hearts are blocked there are only 8 tricks in NT|pg||
nt|psyck: These Grosvenor Coups can really demoralize opps, but not these EW here I'm sure|pg||
mb|1S|nt|STRIK3R: 1@d from south 4+@h|pg||
nt|rmb1: So much different seeing all four hands.  But North does not know about West's clubs or @HK in South|pg||
nt|ady: 4@S  makes    just lose 3 trump tricks|pg||
nt|roswolf: this is how they open a bal strongish hand|pg||
mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|nt|STRIK3R: 1NT from North, 0-2@h's|pg||
nt|rmb1: South has enough shape/points to insist on game|pg||
mb|p|nt|kirp:  does 1N deny 4@S?|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: made 4@H on board 7 in open|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: yes|pg||
nt|oosmanb: 4@H made in the other room, even though East was on lead and led @S|pg||
nt|oosmanb: I mean West was on lead|pg||
nt|mamos: the results service for this tourney is indeed the best ever http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orr7t31-1.htm  120 tables in play in the Open teams and every score  on the internet in a ...|pg||
nt|mamos: flash|pg||
nt|pelu: the 4@H - also misdefense in OR here S dusked to many @S , so 2 @D could go on @ss|pg||
nt|suketbombi: some of the matches close but Monaco has runaway with a 41-0 lead against the Indian Texans|pg||
mb|p|nt|ady: they might play 3NT     might make with fortunate lay of club honors|pg||
nt|rmb1: X of 2@C even by passed hand, is a bit thin|pg||
nt|roswolf: looks like a long auction coming up|pg||
nt|mamos: most interesting contract on that board was 2@hxx .........  by South|pg||
nt|mamos: +1240|pg||
pc|dT|nt|jbgood: transfer?|pg||
nt|rmb1: 3@H might be a transfer or smolen (5+S - 4 H)|pg||
nt|psyck: @h better I think, you can try various lines in @d depending on how it goes if @h were trump|pg||
pc|d2|nt|jbgood: I would not think of Smolen with 6 @s:)|pg||
nt|rmb1: Just trying to get North to declare spades|pg||
nt|jbgood: but surely looks like it|pg||
nt|bagman: W has nothing to add here even though he can see that diamonds are likely to run|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d7|pg||
nt|rmb1: I thought East may double 4M based on West's earlier double.  But he has a different view of the hand|pg||
pc|d5|nt|oosmanb: East discarded a @d, and Nunes ruffed the 4th @D good|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: west thinking of attacking @c's?|pg||
nt|jbgood: is this true?|pg||
nt|rmb1: He may double 5M :)|pg||
nt|rmb1: and North is thinking ... ?|pg||
nt|jbgood: firs willing to play 4@h then 5 @s? Where is dicipline? (but N might have bid 3 NT with his double club stopper|pg||
nt|geot: the 18-20 2@D opening which will likely lead them to slam|pg||
pc|dK|pc|d3|nt|rmb1: I think 3@H was misunderstood|pg||
nt|ady: crazy bidding|pg||
pc|d6|pg||
pc|c5|nt|jbgood: No double:)|pg||
nt|rmb1: no trouble? :(|pg||
nt|ady: very good score for Netherlands  even undoubled|pg||
pc|c7|nt|alok_daga: follow F&N on a regular basis.Dont recollect when they last had such a disastrous set|pg||
nt|bagman: The defense has 3 hearts and a club; declarer can ruff his 3rd club in dummy|pg||
nt|fann4: Claiming time in one second.|pg||
nt|fann4: At this stage it is 19-11 to DEN in vps|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes and it is almost impossible to find a reasonable line that fails on this layout|pg||
pc|cK|nt|jameslee 2: seems a flat board on a @C lead |pg||
nt|geot: As long as the hearts are so friendly he will be playing for an overtrick in 6@H|pg||
pc|c2|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: K/Q@C depends on style |pg||
pc|s2|nt|roswolf: 4nt now or a majestic leap to the final contract?|pg||
pc|sT|pc|sA|nt|roswolf: what are trumps?|pg||
pc|s4|pg||
pc|c3|nt|ady: think south should have taken the money when e/w got to the 5 level |pg||
nt|jbgood: A kib points out: Muller was afraid they would run to 6 sp :)|pg||
pc|s6|pc|cQ|nt|jameslee 2: 1@D for E-W = for 11 |pg||
nt|roswolf: @H ok|pg||
nt|psyck: trump set as @h after the puppet response to 2N|pg||
nt|roswolf: indeed|pg||
nt|psyck: E would not bid 4@c if he had @s instead of @h|pg||
nt|psyck: sry mean if he did not have @h support|pg||
pc|cA|pg||
pc|dJ|nt|xenya: if S is imaginative enough to lead the @D9,,,|pg||
nt|geot: The Norwegians in the lead after winning 11 imps on board 21|pg||
nt|roswolf: on 21 3nt went -3 in the other room  so new leaders again|pg||
pc|h3|pc|d9|pc|c6|pg||
pc|h7|nt|kirp:  Should be down 1 now|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: yes|pg||
nt|oosmanb: EW have been ruthless at this table|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: do we know if there is seeding in RR?|pg||
nt|ady: Netherlands runninfg away   got 10 imps on hand 27th|pg||
pc|h4|pc|hK|nt|kirp:  Fantoni-Nunes look more ruthless|pg||
nt|mamos: wow Meckwell made 6@hx from the North seat|pg||
pc|h5|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|s5|pc|d8|nt|ralfwil: N was punished after a - for me forbidden - lead from Jxx|pg||
nt|fabsayc: board 8 spade lead is right at imps as best shot to beat hand, but more dubious at match points|pg||
nt|fabsayc: over 50% difference between +1 and +2|pg||
nt|fabsayc: i believe the most important decision at mp is the opening lead, which is not given enough consideration|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: and 2 boards left |pg||
nt|psyck: if E was doubleton @h, he would likely have just bid 3N, so 4@c must be cue with @h|pg||
pc|c4|pg||
nt|xenya: but not for long,,,|pg||
pc|d4|pc|s8|pc|h8|nt|roswolf: slam missed in the other room -new leaders again likely|pg||
pc|c8|pg||
nt|geot: A small sensation if "Kanin" wins this match even though the team contain of four strong players|pg||
pc|s7|pc|sJ|pc|s3|pc|sK|pg||
pc|h9|pc|hA|nt|rmb1: Expensive|pg||
pc|h6|pc|hT|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|cT|pc|s9|pc|c9|pg||
pc|h2|pc|hJ|pc|cJ|pc|hQ|pg||
pg||
qx|o9|st||md|3SKT43HKJT76DAC865,S8HA3DQJ7543CA942,SAQJ6H9854D982CKT,S9752HQ2DKT6CQJ73|sv|e|nt|jr7: good defence|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|1H|nt|jr7: 4@H/4@S maybee?|pg||
nt|santyclz: It could have been tougher.|pg||
mb|p|mb|2D|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or16runda1.html|pg||
nt|santyclz: Perhaps 2-way drury or something similar?|pg||
mb|2H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|s8|nt|santyclz: If 2-way it shows a hand interested in a @h game with 4 trump.|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s2|pc|s3|pg||
pc|h4|pc|h2|pc|hJ|pc|hA|pg||
pc|d7|pc|d2|pc|dK|pc|dA|pg||
pc|c5|pc|cA|pc|cT|pc|c3|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d8|pc|d6|pc|h6|pg||
pc|c6|pc|c2|pc|cK|pc|c7|pg||
pc|h5|pc|hQ|pc|hK|pc|h3|pg||
mc|11|pg||
qx|c9|st||md|3SKT43HKJT76DAC865,S8HA3DQJ7543CA942,SAQJ6H9854D982CKT,S9752HQ2DKT6CQJ73|sv|e|nt|rmb1: +620+500 = 15IMPs = very expensive|pg||
nt|alok_daga: in a 10 brd set with IMPS 20 in their favour wud be near 21 no?|pg||
nt|fann4: No, I think it's more than 19|pg||
nt|fann4: Yes checking now|pg||
nt|geot: but Lavazza up by 8 now. |pg||
nt|roswolf: well with all these errors they have a good chance even though behind at the moment|pg||
nt|geot: Exciting match|pg||
nt|xenya: how many times has the lead changed hands -- i seem to have lost count|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Some unblocking in @S might have given the extra trick|pg||
mb|p|nt|jbgood: but self inflicted and well deserved|pg||
nt|roswolf: 96 imps in 23 bds is a lot|pg||
nt|psyck: yes, the other room W did not value his 55 well enough to go further|pg||
mb|p|nt|bagman: S probably showed AK bare by leading the @HK; on the @HK, N should signal as to normal Kx lead; when the @HA reveals the position, N should show suit preference how to get in|pg||
nt|roswolf: this could be feisty|pg||
mb|1H|mb|p|nt|ady: 3NT play wrong way up|pg||
nt|jbgood: a good example why 3NT should be played by W|pg||
nt|fann4: It is in fact 20-10 right now|pg||
nt|roswolf: 4@SX the final contract?|pg||
nt|mamos: gane making for NS here|pg||
mb|2N!|nt|bagman: Facing a limited opening, Greco can pass|pg||
nt|fann4: Same pass in the other room|pg||
nt|fann4: A sensible auction in the OR|pg||
nt|bagman: They also play limited openings, I think|pg||
mb|p|nt|rmb1: 3NT denies outside A/K - but can be 2Q :)|pg||
nt|jbgood: even on a low club lead it is impossible to go right|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: 3@D a bergen style |pg||
nt|hawe45:  It will be bid for sure|pg||
nt|mamos: game|pg||
mb|3C|mb|p|nt|xenya: looks a par here, yes|pg||
mb|3H|nt|kirp:  hard to beat this with N on lead|pg||
nt|ady: both 3NT and 5@D need to beplayed by west|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: 4@S finishe |pg||
nt|jameslee 2: for a 11 flat score |pg||
nt|fann4: I'm not at all convinced about passing the S hand.|pg||
nt|alok_daga: 2spades with hrt,5 3 enterprising|pg||
nt|bagman: If 3@H showed a minimum, E has nothing to add|pg||
mb|p|nt|oosmanb: yeah|pg||
nt|kirp:  even after a @H switch by S, one duck and S has no more entries|pg||
nt|oosmanb: too many stoppers in @s, no entry for @H, |pg||
nt|kirp:  however there are transport problems|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: 4 more IMPs to Angelini|pg||
nt|bigtrain: 3rd seat 1@H seems like it might disrupt things a bit|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: was almost expecting Olsen to open 2@H|pg||
nt|oosmanb: I was half expecting a 1@H opening|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: not sure if he and Jan open 2@H on 5 card suites|pg||
nt|mamos: 2NT some limit bid I guess|pg||
mb|p|nt|patricck: not a lucky contract, but I agree with Souths bidding|pg||
nt|roswolf: east would have done better perhaps by immediately bidding 4@S|pg||
nt|mamos: maybe not bid|pg||
mb|p|nt|jr7: I think they are trying to catch the play they are playing now!|pg||
nt|hawe45:  I know many players, who would - as happened at the other table - have bid 2 @H over Wests 1 @S|pg||
pc|s8|nt|jameslee 2: last board could be a big swing to make the match closer |pg||
nt|fann4: This can easily go 2  down.|pg||
nt|bagman: EW are vulnerable, but I think that this is punishing partner for balancing|pg||
nt|fann4: E did far too much here.|pg||
nt|fann4: And suddenly ANG could pick up 8 or so imps|pg||
nt|alok_daga: &not a bad balance at that.1sp pp 2hrts can be worse|pg||
pc|sA|nt|fann4: Declarer has to guess to play low now for 1 down.|pg||
nt|fann4: I was expecting a trump lead there.|pg||
nt|bagman: W counting points...|pg||
pc|s9|nt|mamos: 9|pg||
pc|s3|pg||
nt|vicky888:  should make now|pg||
nt|bagman: He knows that N has at most 15 and that S passed|pg||
nt|xenya: -2 on a @D ruff|pg||
pc|h4|nt|oosmanb: nice play!|pg||
nt|patricck: actually maybe it isn't so bad|pg||
pc|h2|nt|fabsayc: malinowsku operating again with 3NT bid|pg||
nt|fabsayc: this time succesfully|pg||
nt|jbgood: an early unblock by N|pg||
nt|patricck: with no entry to the long hearts North could have grabbled the 2nd heart and played on @D|pg||
nt|mamos: Both Ns pairs in this match may be relieved that this is a push|pg||
pc|hJ|pc|hA|pg||
nt|roswolf: SUSPECT ONLY -1|pg||
nt|psyck: true, though they may just double that as cards are here|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Will play East for the Ace - hoping @C Ace by West maybe|pg||
nt|mamos: Im told 3@c showed minimum|pg||
pc|d7|nt|kirp:  now  some problems for W|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: entry problem in East|pg||
nt|kirp:  @D might have worked better|pg||
nt|kirp:  than K@C|pg||
nt|oosmanb: small @D or AK/?|pg||
pc|d2|nt|ady: maybe some back for Aptekar|pg||
pc|dK|nt|kirp:  small @D towards J, now W has to hope Q@C dblton|pg||
nt|oosmanb: I think there were problems with small @D to J too, then you dont have tempo for @C tricks|pg||
nt|oosmanb: as south will play another @S, before any @C played|pg||
nt|oosmanb: tricky hand to play|pg||
nt|bagman: N might cash out|pg||
pc|dA|pg||
nt|xenya: sorry i didn't notice there's ruff|pg||
pc|hK|nt|bagman: He knows that W must hold at least one spade|pg||
nt|fann4: There a number of ways to set this 2 tricks, but N has to be careful.|pg||
pc|h3|nt|jameslee 2: 3nt on board 20 can be made to make it a big swing |pg||
nt|fann4: And this is not one of them.|pg||
nt|roswolf: WELL DONE|pg||
pc|h5|pc|hQ|pg||
nt|suketbombi: @C shift wud have been killer declerar can still prevail on this lay out|pg||
nt|xenya: no ruff|pg||
pc|c5|nt|ady: 4@S also a make e/w|pg||
nt|bagman: Before setting it 2 tricks you have to set it 1 trick first|pg||
nt|fann4: Agreed.|pg||
nt|bagman: And if you have the setting trick in hand in a nondoubled vulnerable game, you quite often should cash it|pg||
nt|fann4: Declarer needs to take a ruffing finesse in @C to get 8 tricks|pg||
nt|alok_daga: cash hrt Ace play spade |pg||
nt|geot: In the other room N/S was left in 4@H I hear, bad news for the Norwegians|pg||
nt|xenya: so -1|pg||
pc|c2|nt|roswolf: cashing out i mean|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c3|pg||
nt|patricck: the defnece needed to switch to @C because there is no entry to the @S either|pg||
nt|roswolf: no accidents here|pg||
mc|11|pg||
qx|o10|st||md|4SA953HJT4DAT75C98,ST874H982DK2CQJT3,SKQJ2HKQ3D986C652,S6HA765DQJ43CAK74|sv|b|nt|jr7: riski to play@C - he knows Vest have @H - he try to ruff a @S|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
nt|jr7: a small play - 1NT maybee|pg||
mb|1C|mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|1N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|santyclz: @hj?|pg||
pc|hJ|nt|vugraphpl2: yes :)|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h3|pc|h6|pg||
pc|hT|pc|h8|pc|hK|pc|hA|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d5|pc|dK|pc|d9|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c6|pc|cK|pc|c8|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c9|pc|cT|pc|c2|pg||
pc|c4|pc|s3|pc|cJ|pc|c5|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|d8|pc|c7|nt|santyclz: @hj is a cross between safety and agression -- frequently a good policy defending 1nt when you don't have a 5+card suit.|pg||
pc|s5|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d6|pc|dQ|pc|dA|pg||
pc|h4|pc|h9|pc|hQ|pc|h5|pg||
pc|s2|pc|s6|pc|sA|pc|s4|pg||
pc|s9|pc|s7|pc|sJ|pc|d4|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|dJ|pc|d7|pc|s8|pg||
pc|sK|pc|h7|pc|dT|pc|sT|pg||
nt|santyclz: Great shift by n! |pg||
pg||
qx|c10|st||md|4SA953HJT4DAT75C98,ST874H982DK2CQJT3,SKQJ2HKQ3D986C652,S6HA765DQJ43CAK74|sv|b|nt|ralfwil: and more than that....|pg||
nt|vugraphpl7: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/mxp/fa.html|pg||
nt|ralfwil: looks like 100%|pg||
nt|kirp:  he was hoping NS would duck k@C and then he could switch to @Ds|pg||
nt|rmb1: 13 back. 5@D played by W in OR|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: 1100 lets see |pg||
nt|jameslee 2: 15 IMps |pg||
nt|jameslee 2: are in play |pg||
nt|jameslee 2: for a 27/26 end |pg||
nt|alok_daga: the play of the cl Q was poor spade Ace,hrt Ace cah,spade|pg||
nt|alok_daga: cash|pg||
nt|fann4: Sorry, I meant 9 tricks, for 1 down|pg||
nt|psyck: The Italians, not unexpectedly, have not only comeback but also gaind a big lead, it will be tough for the Norwegians to comeback now|pg||
nt|roswolf: but a big italian gain|pg||
mb|1D|nt|ralfwil: instead of about 95%|pg||
nt|oosmanb: Potential for Jans to pull some imps back then|pg||
nt|jr7: 4@H in N/S|pg||
nt|ady: swingy srt|pg||
nt|jbgood: same opening in the OR - but W preferred 5@d|pg||
nt|ady: set|pg||
nt|rmb1: Thanks to BBO and EBL for organising.  Thanks to operator.  Thanks to David and Jon|pg||
nt|ady: thx all|pg||
nt|hawe45:  3 NT is no safe winner|pg||
mb|p|nt|STRIK3R: Yes, playing the K works if AQ is not on same hand|pg||
mb|1S|nt|jr7: 4@S in Ø/V only 2 down|pg||
mb|p|nt|jameslee 2: specs are on favour of a 3nt -1 on @D lead |pg||
mb|1N|nt|ady: e/w can make 3NT  even on a heart lead    but unlikely to get there|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: so not such big swing |pg||
nt|hawe45:  But how about 2 @H DOUBLED...|pg||
nt|alok_daga: Last brd of the set.Thnks 2 fellow commentators,specs&Monica for the gr8 vugraph|pg||
nt|bagman: Hampson might jump to 3@D|pg||
nt|bagman: if he ever gets to make the 2nd bid|pg||
nt|roswolf: on the last one the norwegians seemed unduly inhibited in the auction|pg||
nt|roswolf: in the other room|pg||
mb|p|nt|kirp:    think tahts what he was hoping for|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: yes|pg||
nt|bigtrain: this might be 14 for a tie|pg||
mb|p|nt|fabsayc: actually cost more than 20%|pg||
nt|ady: 4@S  doomed on early heart play|pg||
nt|psyck: yes, strange when E knew 10 card fit there|pg||
nt|roswolf: 1nt now?|pg||
nt|roswolf: or 21C?|pg||
nt|geot: A light 3rd seat opening by Sementa here, in what looks like a partscore. But N/S has 24 HCPs|pg||
nt|roswolf: 2@C|pg||
mb|p|pc|hJ|nt|bigtrain: probably only 12 though|pg||
nt|fann4: Maybe, because of the limited non-opening of 1@C, but that should still end things.|pg||
nt|pelu: last board - I will tx our great operator, many acitive kibs, and spec tx to the polish IT-.staff: outstanding work|pg||
nt|psyck: 2@c looked best to me|pg||
nt|roswolf: another anti %view by south|pg||
nt|mamos: These are 28 board matches so we are about 1/3 of the way through|pg||
nt|hawe45:  tricks for the defense - did´nt get them in OR|pg||
nt|hawe45:  7 tricks|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Same lead as here|pg||
pc|h2|nt|oosmanb: They've bought the hand|pg||
nt|ady: well stopped    |pg||
pc|hK|nt|ady: cannot fault e/w for not playing 3NT|pg||
nt|fann4: No, these guys don't jump on hands like this.|pg||
pc|hA|pg||
nt|vbman: -200|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: 3@D x ? how many off  |pg||
nt|hawe45:  12 IMP´s - at least|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: -1 |pg||
nt|patricck: last board? It is a 14 board set isn't it?|pg||
nt|psyck: to show @s fit & extra values|pg||
nt|psyck: unless 2@c natural, in which case NT ok|pg||
nt|roswolf: north has taken a good view to pass probably|pg||
pc|d3|nt|jr7: 1@C is strog, 2@C = diamond|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: that makes 700  for 12 |pg||
nt|vugraphpl7: yes, 14 board set|pg||
pc|d5|nt|fabsayc: now north needs to hold 10xx of hearts or another disaster|pg||
nt|kirp:  this looks straightforward|pg||
nt|ady: thx all    interesting set|pg||
nt|pelu: sorry - wrong - again :(:( - 14 boards - so long way to go - but still tx :)|pg||
pc|dK|nt|psyck: S cannot have more as he did not x 1st, so thats about as high as they were going i guess|pg||
nt|roswolf: north needs to guarantee his club ruff here|pg||
nt|roswolf: she south is a lady|pg||
pc|d6|pg||
nt|jr7: strong|pg||
nt|cenglund:  Should be only 1 down|pg||
nt|jameslee 2: and a match 26/24 |pg||
nt|suketbombi: no 14X3 =42 bds in total|pg||
pc|d2|nt|kirp:  9 or 10 trix|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: wont take long|pg||
pc|d8|nt|oosmanb: Last hand of the segment, but LOTS more bridge to come!|pg||
nt|oosmanb: Thank you to the organizers, and fellow commentators|pg||
nt|kirp:  ciao|pg||
nt|STRIK3R: hade|pg||
nt|jbgood: some really astonishing actions - great show|pg||
nt|ady: well Aptekar got to 3NT in OR   surprising   so finishing a close match|pg||
pc|dJ|nt|fann4: So a likely flat or 1imp board - meaning an excellent result for DEN, who are in 6th position in the A Swiss right now.|pg||
nt|alok_daga: GN all|pg||
nt|bagman: the trump lead was quite standard after the auction; with hearts 3-3 the spades go away for push|pg||
nt|fann4: Whereas ANG are 28th - remember the top 27 go thru, with 5 teams from the B Swiss, to the round of 32.|pg||
nt|fann4: For live updates on a brilliant site go to     http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/oswleaderb.html|pg||
pc|dT|pg||
nt|hawe45:  South will take this, play @H 10 and continue @H|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Bridge is an easy game - just take your tricks|pg||
mc|7|pg||
qx|o11|st||md|1ST753HT76DK764C53,SA42HQ953DA952CJ7,SQJ986HK2DQ83CT86,SKHAJ84DJTCAKQ942|sv|o|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|jr7: 7@C, 7@H, 7NT|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: 4 boards to go in this segment... 18IMP different|pg||
mb|1C|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|1S|mb|4H|mb|p|nt|jr7: 4@S oly 2 down|pg||
nt|jr7: only|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|pc|sQ|pc|sK|pc|sT|pc|s2|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h6|pc|h3|nt|santyclz: Seems a bit timid by w after being raised to game and holding 2 side aces...|pg||
pc|h2|pg||
pc|hJ|pc|h7|pc|h5|pc|hK|pg||
nt|jr7: they have both a littel ekstra in the pocket :)|pg||
mc|12|pg||
qx|c11|st||md|1ST753HT76DK764C53,SA42HQ953DA952CJ7,SQJ986HK2DQ83CT86,SKHAJ84DJTCAKQ942|sv|o|nt|patricck: The score sheets on the link seem to be set out for two segments of 14, so probably 28 board match as Roland suggested|pg||
nt|suketbombi: ok only 28 bd K/O?|pg||
nt|patricck: Yes, very cutthroat isn't it ? :)|pg||
nt|psyck: if @s's were going to be 33, there was no hurry to test that|pg||
nt|roswolf: hmm the norsemen and women sinking to the bottom of the fyord|pg||
nt|mamos: declarer let in|pg||
nt|mamos: and knew what to do|pg||
nt|hawe45:  In fact a very good slam here|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|pelu: same in mixed-teams|pg||
nt|roswolf: true CK|pg||
mb|p|mb|1C|nt|hawe45:  Because of the @C Jack-entry!|pg||
mb|p|mb|1H|nt|suketbombi: will settle for the good Old 3nt soon here|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|nt|mamos: Strong Club|pg||
mb|2S|mb|p|nt|psyck: a game forcing stayman 2@d bid maybe|pg||
nt|roswolf: looks like it|pg||
nt|psyck: 2@s could be 4 cards I suppose|pg||
nt|psyck: now 3@h - 3@s?|pg||
mb|p|mb|3C|nt|fabsayc: arggh, if you must bid again, double is clear|pg||
mb|p|mb|3H|nt|roswolf: a firm 3nt no doubt|pg||
nt|psyck: good S did not have slam ambitions here as 5 level is not safe|pg||
mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|psyck: with this lie, neither @s not NT safe at 5 level|pg||
nt|hawe45:  BOTH North-players bid 1 @S - for what reason?|pg||
pc|sQ|nt|hawe45:  Ah - the lead|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s3|pc|s4|pg||
nt|mamos: EW not close to Slam at either table|pg||
nt|hawe45:  I have been told, that the 1 @S-bid is the main-reason, why E/W did´nt bid the slam. One never stops learning|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c3|nt|pelu: ok I am back with u - multi-tasking :)|pg||
pc|cJ|nt|psyck: other room stopped in 4N, so push|pg||
pc|cT|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h2|pc|hJ|pc|h7|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h6|pc|h5|pc|hK|pg||
mc|13|pg||
qx|o12|st||md|2ST98HJ75D2CJ97643,SAK3HAT2DQJT97CAT,SQ54HK9863D8543C5,SJ762HQ4DAK6CKQ82|sv|n|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or16runda1.html|pg||
mb|1D|mb|p|mb|1S|nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|jr7: what now - 6 is very good - a lot of possibillity|pg||
mb|p|mb|2N|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|santyclz: 2 cards below a 7...|pg||
mb|6N|nt|jr7: I think he just bid 6NT :)|pg||
mb|p|nt|jr7: Y|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|santyclz: He thinks so too.|pg||
nt|santyclz: Right-sided it.|pg||
nt|jr7: what now - 11 from top and a lot af possibillity|pg||
pc|d4|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or16runda1.html|pg||
nt|santyclz: N wasn't nice enough -- any other suit gave an extra trick.|pg||
nt|jr7: I think a small @S to the J dont kill any of the other possibillities|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d2|pc|d7|pg||
pc|dK|pc|sT|pc|d9|pc|d3|pg||
pc|d6|pc|c7|nt|jr7: He cant drop anything from table with more @D|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d5|pg||
nt|jr7: small @S now!|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s4|pc|s2|pc|s8|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s5|pc|s6|pc|s9|pg||
pc|s3|pc|sQ|pc|s7|mc|12|pg||
qx|c12|st||md|2ST98HJ75D2CJ97643,SAK3HAT2DQJT97CAT,SQ54HK9863D8543C5,SJ762HQ4DAK6CKQ82|sv|n|nt|suketbombi: me too:) back|pg||
nt|roswolf: an imp to lavazza|pg||
nt|mamos: lol   it took up lots of bidding space Hans|pg||
mb|1C|nt|hawe45:  Seriously: I just learned, that 1 @S spoils the relay-system by E/W - having easily bid slam withou it. Interesting indeed - then 1 @S is a GOOD bid|pg||
nt|mamos: Slam again:)|pg||
mb|p|nt|fabsayc: michael yuen is one of my friends from vancouver|pg||
nt|psyck: 1 round of @s before the @h would have enabled him to play for the o/t with 2 @s finesses|pg||
mb|1H|nt|patricck: looks like another flat one here, hard imagine anything other than an EW spade game|pg||
nt|suketbombi: will settle for 4@S here E-W doubt N-S will come in in these colours |pg||
mb|p|nt|hawe45:  Not if North bids 1 @S...|pg||
mb|1S!|nt|suketbombi: but aptekar has ideas of bidding 3@C i|pg||
mb|p|nt|suketbombi: DOUBLEEEEE it says :)|pg||
mb|2D!|nt|patricck: yikes, at that vulnerability with a strong NT behind him? :(|pg||
nt|psyck: a drury seq should get them to 4@h here|pg||
mb|p|mb|2H!|mb|p|mb|2S!|nt|psyck: Duboin conservatively passed 3rd seat, as Vul I suppose|pg||
mb|p|nt|fabsayc: wow is 3@S forcing|pg||
nt|suketbombi: best to overtake and Return @C he is not sure tho @SK cud be doubleton|pg||
nt|pelu: close fight in most maches, only 4 with big leads: NL-red +38 (Lowicz), Maroco Z + 33 (India), Kopecky + 31 (Hungary) and Denmark + 23 (Russia)|pg||
nt|psyck: & bad @s suit|pg||
mb|2N!|mb|p|mb|3H!|mb|p|mb|3S!|mb|p|nt|hawe45:  Not 12 sure tricks, and only losing line should be @H to the 10, I think|pg||
mb|4C!|nt|xenya: thoughtful lead -- but to no avail|pg||
nt|roswolf: declarer needs to take a little care|pg||
mb|p|nt|patricck: OK :)|pg||
nt|hawe45:  @C to the 10 works better|pg||
mb|4D|an| |mb|p|mb|4S|an| |nt|hawe45:  Sorry - every finesse with one of West´m s 10 will work|pg||
mb|p|nt|suketbombi: now back to @S and wait|pg||
mb|4N|an| |nt|fabsayc: this hand is for swindlers so should be played really fast|pg||
nt|fabsayc: and swindle on|pg||
nt|psyck: oh oh|pg||
nt|roswolf: not enough care|pg||
nt|xenya: re4ally?|pg||
mb|p|mb|5D!|nt|patricck: actually that was meant for someone else..... this contract is definitely not OK|pg||
mb|p|nt|pelu: OK for EW :)|pg||
nt|suketbombi: 4 tricks in bag and 1hs @d and more @Cs to loose|pg||
mb|5H!|mb|p|mb|6C!|nt|xenya: that's better|pg||
mb|p|nt|hawe45:  I can explain the bidding - finishing before midnight, maybe...|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Was just told from Swden, that West knows partners hand so good, that he has allready started planning the play...!|pg||
nt|james_h: sir|pg||
nt|james_h: sorry|pg||
mb|6N|nt|suketbombi: ok 3@Cs will be make but by E_W:)|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|roswolf: ah maybe enough|pg||
nt|psyck: ok, he was not sleepy after all|pg||
mb|p|nt|mamos: 6@d a better contract?|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d6|pc|d2|pc|dJ|pg||
nt|suketbombi: no :(:(|pg||
pc|h2|nt|mamos: so declarer has  eleven tricks and a number of ways to try for twelfth  his problem is how to best combine chances|pg||
pc|h3|pc|hQ|pc|h5|pg||
pc|dA|pc|c7|nt|mamos: and his first plan was a success  leading twards @hQ|pg||
pc|d7|pc|d5|pg||
nt|fabsayc: this is why south should have asked about 3@S bid|pg||
pc|dK|pc|c3|pc|d9|pc|d4|pg||
nt|ralfwil: must be a big round for EW|pg||
nt|fabsayc: 95% round|pg||
nt|fabsayc: in fact the pattern of all these hands is avoiding overtricks|pg||
nt|vugraphpl7: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/mxp/fa.html|pg||
pc|s2|pc|sT|pc|sA|pc|s4|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d8|pc|s6|nt|james_h: I like this line better than at the other table|pg||
pc|s8|pg||
pc|dT|pc|c5|pc|h4|pc|s9|pg||
nt|mamos: yes  I think the Heart play  combined more chances|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s5|pc|s7|pc|h7|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h6|pc|sJ|pc|hJ|pg||
mc|12|pg||
qx|o13|st||md|3SAH6532DKQJ75CQJ7,ST43HJT9DA9842C95,SQJ9762HKQ8D6CAT4,SK85HA74DT3CK8632|sv|b|nt|vugraphpl2: 2 boards to go in this segment :)|pg||
nt|jr7: a lot of squeezes very ready if ... - but he took the line-way :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: the 2nd segment should begin at 18|pg||
mb|2S|an| |mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: so in 70minutes :)|pg||
nt|santyclz: Vg in your timezone: http://online.bridgebase.com/vugraph/schedule.php  Make it your home page!|pg||
nt|jr7: must bee old people :)|pg||
mb|3D|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|nt|santyclz: Intermediate 2s?|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|pc|c3|nt|santyclz: Haven't seen much of those lately, except, of course, for Fantunes.|pg||
nt|jr7: not a good contrakt :(|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or16runda1.html|pg||
nt|jr7: when Vest on @DE is playing @C - everything vent wrong!|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletins|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c5|pc|cT|pg||
pc|d6|pc|d3|pc|dK|pc|dA|pg||
pc|c9|pc|c4|pc|cK|pc|cJ|pg||
pc|c2|pc|cQ|pc|sT|pc|cA|pg||
pc|s2|pc|s5|pc|sA|pc|s3|pg||
pc|h2|pc|hJ|pc|hK|pc|hA|pg||
pc|c8|pc|h3|pc|d2|pc|s6|pg||
pc|c6|pc|h5|pc|d4|nt|santyclz: This line basically needed 5-2@cs without the @ha with the long @cs and the singleton @s k.|pg||
pc|h8|pg||
pc|sK|pc|d5|pc|s4|pc|s7|pg||
mc|7|pg||
qx|c13|st||md|3SAH6532DKQJ75CQJ7,ST43HJT9DA9842C95,SQJ9762HKQ8D6CAT4,SK85HA74DT3CK8632|sv|b|nt|suketbombi: defence missed a trick there|pg||
nt|patricck: a triumph, only -1100|pg||
nt|roswolf: anything could happen here|pg||
mb|2S|mb|p|nt|psyck: yes, cards fav for a swing if only 1 get to say 4@S|pg||
nt|mamos: 10-13 2@s|pg||
mb|2N|mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|mb|3N|nt|roswolf: bergen type raise|pg||
nt|psyck: She could not bid game after that limit raise with a min i suppose|pg||
nt|roswolf: surprised no game bid|pg||
mb|p|nt|fabsayc: i think i would be reopening with double on west hand|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|psyck: knowing a few deals did not go well, maybe she should have tried|pg||
pc|hJ|nt|mamos: it seems that every pair reaches game here   but making it has not been so easy|pg||
pc|hK|nt|xenya: this does looks a bit conservative|pg||
nt|roswolf: yup|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h2|pg||
pc|c3|nt|mamos: Best defence is to take out this Heart entry now|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c9|pc|cT|pg||
nt|pelu: easy 10 tricks - S can set up 9 with 3 @D-tricks, and late a @C-trick will come|pg||
pc|d6|pc|d3|nt|geot: not such a great game, though, both clubs and spades must be favourable. |pg||
pc|dK|pc|dA|pg||
pc|c5|nt|mamos: communications just too difficult for declarer|pg||
pc|cA|nt|psyck: tough to evaluate how useful the holdings in the side suits are going to be, but could have made a general try with 3@h on 3@d|pg||
pc|c2|pc|cJ|pg||
pc|s2|pc|s8|nt|pelu: it was not safe to play on @C - would go down if @DA in East - @D was the safe suit|pg||
pc|sA|nt|suketbombi:  what is the logic in playing @CS when @D play would have yielded sure 9 tricks?|pg||
pc|s3|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d4|nt|psyck: they bid 4@s in other room, so that is the last nail|pg||
pc|s6|pc|dT|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|d2|pc|c4|pc|s5|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h9|pc|hQ|pc|h4|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|sK|nt|mamos: now the bad break in Diamonds means a loss on the board|pg||
mc|6|nt|mamos: no more tricks|pg||
pg||
qx|o14|st||md|4S953H742DKJT4C987,SQJ6H8DA87CAKJT62,SKT8742HAQJT6D93C,SAHK953DQ652CQ543|sv|o|nt|vugraphpl2: last board before us :)|pg||
mb|p|nt|jr7: last play - but maybee a funny play!|pg||
mb|p|mb|1C|mb|1S|mb|d|mb|p|mb|3C|mb|3H|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or16runda1.html|pg||
mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: information www.poznan2011.pl |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule www.poznan2011.pl/schedule |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: http://www.bridgebase.com/vugraph/schedule.php|pg||
pc|h2|nt|vugraphpl2: bulletin www.poznan2011.pl/bulletin|pg||
nt|santyclz: 8 top tricks and the 9th on the lead or the @sq.|pg||
pc|h8|pc|hJ|pc|hK|pg||
nt|jr7: now 9|pg||
pc|c5|pc|c8|pc|cK|pc|s2|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s4|pc|sA|pc|s3|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|c7|pc|c2|pc|s7|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c9|pc|cA|pc|s8|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|sT|pc|c3|pc|h4|pg||
pc|cT|pc|h6|pc|d2|nt|jr7: nice with @SD - he knows when NS is in, they take the rest :)|pg||
pc|h7|pg||
pc|c6|nt|santyclz: Last board, thanks Maria, great job.|pg||
pc|hA|nt|vugraphpl2: ty too :)|pg||
pc|h3|pc|d4|pg||
nt|jr7: bye all|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d3|pc|d5|pc|dT|pg||
pc|d7|pc|d9|pc|d6|pc|dJ|pg||
pc|dK|pc|d8|pc|hT|pc|dQ|pg||
pc|s5|pc|s6|pc|sK|pc|h5|pg||
nt|santyclz: Final session of the round robin in about 55 minutes.|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h9|pc|s9|pc|sJ|pg||
nt|santyclz: Thanks all bye for now.|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: ty all :) see you in 55 minutes :)|pg||
pg||
qx|c14|st||md|4S953H742DKJT4C987,SQJ6H8DA87CAKJT62,SKT8742HAQJT6D93C,SAHK953DQ652CQ543|sv|o|nt|ralfwil: a bad score for EW|pg||
nt|pelu: looks stange, but S still in chock after the 3@cX :)|pg||
nt|roswolf: We are now on the last board of the set. Thanks to our operator, Monika -Great Job! Our appreciation to all the organisers for ensuring that this fine event is brought to BBO ...|pg||
nt|roswolf: vugraph. Thanks too to my very learned fellow commentators CK, Vladimir and Geo for their company and perceptive comments and to our specs whose contributions keep us on our toes.|pg||
nt|psyck: Last deal, thanks all & see you in the round of 16 starting in about 1.5 hours.|pg||
nt|xenya: thanks everyone|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes scheduled restart 15.30 CET|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|geot: tks, and bye all:)|pg||
mb|2C!|mb|2S|mb|d|nt|fabsayc: no maybe even over average|pg||
nt|suketbombi: this one is indeed the last for the set peter:)|pg||
nt|mamos: this is the last board of this stanza|pg||
mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|nt|suketbombi: thx operator Patrick & peter and also the Kibs|pg||
nt|pelu: now last board of this segment - and again Tx for Operator, kibs and fellow commentators - and again - We cant do that too many times: tx to the outstanding IT-staff - I have never ...|pg||
nt|pelu: seen better servise for kibs and us !|pg||
nt|suketbombi: true peter I second your views|pg||
nt|mamos: Thanks to my felow commentator Hans|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: game hand to finish with|pg||
mb|p|nt|mamos: and to our operator in Poland  -- great job thank you|pg||
nt|mamos: thanks to you all|pg||
pc|hQ|nt|pelu: for several decades most of the staff came from Netherland - in the future, the IT-staff from Poland sh be send all over the world :)|pg||
nt|mamos: and to BBO and the EBL for bringing us this tourney and the Polish team for organising the best ever results and webpages|pg||
nt|mamos: this has seemed a difficult set  |pg||
pc|hK|pc|h7|pc|h8|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|dK|pc|dA|nt|ralfwil: until now over 90%|pg||
pc|d3|pg||
nt|ralfwil: for NS|pg||
nt|fabsayc: oh of course normal spade lead likely holds to 3|pg||
nt|ralfwil: and no cover on @h10|pg||
nt|fabsayc: i was expecting more +200 for NS on 13, but so far only 1|pg||
nt|fabsayc: two pairs in 4@H making on 33 fit|pg||
nt|fabsayc: not a mp success however|pg||
nt|fabsayc: play seems relatively fast, they must enforce slow penalties :)|pg||
nt|mamos: playing @hK looks right  if you win  you are home  if it loses you are not dead|pg||
pc|cA|pc|s2|nt|roswolf: whoops going too high|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c7|pg||
nt|suketbombi: another pass :) they have tasted Blood :) soon a signal for @CS and declerar will get 4@HS + @DA on good defence|pg||
pc|s6|pc|s4|nt|roswolf: club lead for glory|pg||
pc|sA|nt|roswolf: hooray|pg||
nt|geot: or J of hearts. but not diamond lead...then 1 imp out for the N/S pair|pg||
nt|xenya: voila :)|pg||
nt|psyck: y, anything but @dT|pg||
nt|geot: yes|pg||
pc|s3|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c8|pc|cT|pc|s7|pg||
pc|cK|pc|s8|pc|cQ|pc|c9|pg||
nt|suketbombi: @S now|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|h6|nt|patricck: no, only -2 |pg||
pc|c5|nt|mamos: and if you duck you still only have eight tricks|pg||
pc|h4|pg||
pc|c6|nt|roswolf: b7ye all see you back in 90 mins|pg||
nt|psyck: Most imps traded in this matchup :)  http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/or32runda1.html|pg||
pc|d9|pc|d2|pc|s5|pg||
mc|9|pg||