vg|C EC 2011 Open Teams RR _,7_7,I,1,10,Angelini,0,Mossop,0|
rs|3NE+1,3NE=,2SE=,3DW-1,3NS=,2NS+2,1HN+1,1NW=,6SS-1,6SN-1,5SWx=,6HS-1,3HE+1,4HE=,4SN+1,4SN+3,3NE=,3CW=,1NE=,4HW-1|
pn|Fantoni,Carroll,Nunes,Garvey,Mossop,Brogeland,Zivkovic,Angelini|pg||
qx|o1|st||md|3SA652H743DJT4CT87,SJ943H86DQ7CAJ632,SQT8HQT52D9652CQ4,SK7HAKJ9DAK83CK95|sv|o|nt|henryb:  Hello Tom|pg||
mb|p|mb|2N|mb|p|nt|ballebodk: hi Henry|pg||
nt|hedyg: good afternoon and welcome back to the 5th European Open Championships, Poznan, Poland. open teams ,RR 7/7, 10 boards / round|pg||
mb|3C|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|mb|3H|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|hedyg: our operator is Michal Gorny|pg||
nt|henryb:  "Puppet Stayman", E showed some major suit length, West showed 4@s and East said "I don't have @s"|pg||
pc|dJ|nt|hedyg: EW CC: http://www.ecatsbridge.org/documents/files/ConventionCards/2008MindSportGamesBeijing/Open/Ireland/garvey-carroll.pdf|pg||
nt|hedyg: NS CC: http://www.ecatsbridge.org/documents/files/ConventionCards/2009BermudaBowlBrazil/bermudabowl/italy/fantoni-nunes.pdf|pg||
pc|d7|pc|d2|pc|dK|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c7|pc|c2|pc|c4|pg||
pc|c5|pc|c8|pc|cJ|pc|cQ|pg||
nt|ballebodk: look at the clubsuit - its taken from the books - if you could come forth and back the right way to play the clubs will be to take the A first and then towards the K9 - but you are ...|pg||
nt|ballebodk: an entry short to that :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: the official website is : http://www.poznan2011.pl/|pg||
pc|h5|pc|hA|pc|h7|pc|h6|pg||
pc|d3|nt|hedyg: results and running scores: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
pc|d4|pc|dQ|pc|d5|pg||
pc|cA|pc|d6|pc|c9|pc|cT|pg||
pc|c6|pc|d9|pc|s7|pc|dT|pg||
nt|hedyg: 1st 3 qualify / group for the A Swiss teams|pg||
pc|c3|pc|s8|pc|sK|pc|s2|pg||
pc|h8|pc|hT|pc|hJ|pc|h3|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h4|pc|s3|pc|h2|pg||
pc|dA|mc|10|pg||
qx|c1|st||md|3SA652H743DJT4CT87,SJ943H86DQ7CAJ632,SQT8HQT52D9652CQ4,SK7HAKJ9DAK83CK95|sv|o|nt|bagman: Hi all|pg||
mb|p|mb|1C|nt|Gerben42:  welcome back in Poznan|pg||
nt|davpro: Morning all|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: hi all|pg||
mb|1D|nt|hawe45:  A splinter in North would do fine - in later defense|pg||
mb|p|nt|jbgood: hi|pg||
nt|davpro: Thx operator. It looked like an forcing pass-opening :)|pg||
mb|2N|mb|p|nt|davpro: Who is Brogeland playing with?|pg||
mb|3C|mb|p|nt|davpro: Ah- there the name came|pg||
mb|3D|nt|hawe45:  You have seen too manu bad overcalls, when you sell out with the North hand|pg||
mb|p|mb|3H|mb|p|nt|Gerben42:  south hand is known as Bridge World Death Hand (BWDH)|pg||
nt|Gerben42:  invitational values with 3-card support for partner|pg||
nt|bagman: South has a nice hand with spade values and N has an easy raise to game with 2 aces|pg||
nt|hawe45:  East has built a trap - will remove to 5 @H, only losing 100 I think|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Is there a reward for "slowest bid hand of the tournament" - without special reason...|pg||
nt|bridge_one: Hello all|pg||
nt|runnerup: hi all|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Hello|pg||
mb|3N|nt|Gerben42:  with Qxxxx x Axxx xxx North would pass and 4@S would be cold|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|Gerben42:  but there is normally no perfect answer|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: 10 tricks are on ice here|pg||
nt|roswolf: players names will be up in a mo|pg||
nt|jbgood: going through the motions|pg||
pc|dJ|nt|runnerup: looks dangerous -all tricks possible|pg||
nt|davpro: W probably showed 4@s and E might have shown 4@h. I don't know their system :(|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d6|pc|d3|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c4|pc|c9|pc|cT|pg||
nt|jbgood: puppet i think - then 3@d shows 1 or 2 4 card majors, and deny 5|pg||
pc|dT|nt|hawe45:  13 tricks - over|pg||
pc|d7|nt|hawe45:  or 12|pg||
pc|d2|nt|bagman: One of the answers is to use an artificial tool to separate hands with 3 card spades and those with 0-2|pg||
nt|bridge_one: and 6 is down with @H lead|pg||
nt|davpro: y- that was my guess too|pg||
pc|dA|pg||
nt|jbgood: then responder bids the suit he doesnt have |pg||
pc|cK|pc|c7|pc|c3|pc|cQ|pg||
pc|c5|pc|c8|pc|cA|nt|hawe45:  Funny hand|pg||
nt|bridge_one: funny for N/S |pg||
nt|hawe45:  1590 - a score not seen so often...|pg||
pc|h2|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|h5|pc|h9|mc|9|nt|davpro: Declarer can count to 9. Lets see if he tries for more|pg||
nt|davpro: nope|pg||
nt|jbgood: he actually had 10 from the top if n really discarded 2 hearts|pg||
pg||
qx|o2|st||md|4SQJH9753DAQJ92C96,SHT4DK87654CAQJ75,SA6432HQJ86DTCK42,SKT9875HAK2D3CT83|sv|n|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|1N|nt|hedyg: in this group the 4th places team is 10 VPs behind the 3rd|pg||
mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|eamongall: good afternoon .. I get to commentate on friends Garvey and Carroll |pg||
nt|hedyg: so Mossop needs a miracle to qualify|pg||
pc|h3|nt|eamongall: ah only first 3 qualifying |pg||
pc|h4|pc|hJ|pc|hK|pg||
nt|hedyg: only 10 tricks Michal?|pg||
nt|eamongall: I was thinking first 4 for a long time |pg||
nt|hedyg: k|pg||
nt|henryb:  Hedy, I do not think declarer took the @h finesse|pg||
nt|ballebodk: when you have the W hand and hear p to open 1 sp you dont like him much but when he rebid 2 sp you look around the room for a new pard :) - but its a good pas from W, before you ...|pg||
nt|ballebodk: get in to much trouble|pg||
pc|d3|pc|dA|pc|d4|pc|dT|pg||
pc|h5|pc|hT|pc|h6|pc|hA|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c6|pc|cQ|pc|cK|pg||
nt|hedyg: LOL Tom|pg||
nt|hedyg: time to cash the @H trick|pg||
nt|ballebodk: i'm pretty sure when you look at the scoresheets afterwods you will find several that have ended in big trouble|pg||
nt|hedyg: but not with new partners!|pg||
nt|henryb:  If declarer lays down the @sK he should survive for +110|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c8|pc|c9|pc|cJ|pg||
pc|dK|pc|s4|pc|s5|pc|dQ|pg||
pc|sK|pc|sJ|pc|d5|pc|sA|pg||
pc|h8|pc|h2|pc|h7|pc|d6|pg||
nt|hedyg: Nunes would like Fantoni to cash the J@D|pg||
pc|c2|pc|cT|pc|sQ|pc|c5|pg||
mc|8|pg||
qx|c2|st||md|4SQJH9753DAQJ92C96,SHT4DK87654CAQJ75,SA6432HQJ86DTCK42,SKT9875HAK2D3CT83|sv|n|nt|eamongall: Here defence need to find the @C ruff in time to beat 4@Hs |pg||
nt|roswolf: 10 or 11 tricks operator?|pg||
nt|davpro: there was actually 12 to take (double dummie)|pg||
mb|1S|nt|davpro: 10 point all around. |pg||
mb|p|nt|bridge_one: with 6/5 and only 1 defencive trick normally better to play in attack|pg||
mb|1N|mb|p|nt|runnerup: perhaps east should take it away -he has got support in hearts so ..|pg||
nt|jbgood: Angelini seems to be in the A Swiss almost no matter what happens in this match|pg||
mb|2S|nt|davpro: y and Mossop will need a good result to joij them|pg||
mb|p|mb|3D|nt|davpro: *join|pg||
nt|jbgood: 24 vps to Mossop |pg||
nt|jbgood: 3 from each group to A - the others to B|pg||
mb|p|nt|hawe45:  About 12 tricks again - but lucky and only in South|pg||
nt|bridge_one: Jxxx in @D are very much - the double by Versace means balanced hand value in @S - Zaleski can reopen|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|jbgood: then 27 from A and 5 from B go on to the KO stage|pg||
nt|davpro: They found a 6-1 fit instead of the 6-0 fit. On level higher though|pg||
pc|hQ|nt|eamongall: the non-vul Townsend might venture an insurance 4@Hs |pg||
nt|jbgood: but I think a black suit or even NT play better than @ds|pg||
nt|davpro: y|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h3|nt|bridge_one: so 2@C forcing one round|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Best lead: @S King|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Sorry - NORTH is declarer... - wake up|pg||
pc|h4|pg||
nt|roswolf: south wont get in much to lead trumps|pg||
nt|hawe45:  But would also make on the @S-lead|pg||
nt|bridge_one: lead small @S possible but @H equivalent - many use to overcall 1@S in West to give the lead|pg||
nt|bridge_one: with weak 5332 i agree to pass like Versace|pg||
nt|hawe45:  But an overcall would put the contract in South, so...|pg||
nt|runnerup: nothing really helps,but contracts should have been by south this time -by n= -if spade lead,but now 12|pg||
nt|bridge_one: the option between @H and @S lead is a typical problem in bridge|pg||
pc|d3|nt|eamongall: Now defence need to get active |pg||
pc|d2|pc|dK|pc|dT|pg||
nt|roswolf: and wont necessarily lead one anyway:)|pg||
nt|jbgood: hi Roland and all|pg||
nt|jbgood: sry - wrong table:)|pg||
nt|jbgood: maybe 2 |pg||
pc|d7|nt|eamongall: still time |pg||
nt|bagman: N has to duck the @HK if W plays a low heart|pg||
nt|bagman: Both N and S know that there are no spade tricks to make|pg||
pc|s4|nt|bridge_one: i prefere to lead in the suit more solid, but without a solid suit i prefere the lead from small cards - but is is only a opinion|pg||
nt|jbgood: NT is more flexible than 3@d|pg||
pc|s7|nt|bagman: They also see the clubs so they can make extra tricks only from trumps|pg||
pc|d9|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|d4|pc|s2|pc|h2|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d5|pc|s3|nt|jbgood: an imaginative E might bid 3@c then:)|pg||
pc|c3|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d8|pc|s6|pc|s5|pg||
nt|eamongall: At another table McGann Brown have reached the happy position of having 3 vulnerable doubled undertricks available against 4@S ...they still have to collect them |pg||
pc|h5|pc|hT|nt|Gerben42:  going plus got to be worth something|pg||
nt|Gerben42:  so far +100 is almost worth everything|pg||
nt|Gerben42:  if Madala is N then S is Rimstedt|pg||
nt|Gerben42:  operator please correct S name?|pg||
pc|h6|pc|hA|pg||
pc|cT|nt|bridge_one: i think finesse in @C give more % at declarer|pg||
pc|c6|pc|c5|pc|cK|pg||
mc|8|pg||
qx|o3|st||md|1S32HT763DAQCAT532,SQ765H854DT93CJ87,SKT84HAK9DK8752CK,SAJ9HQJ2DJ64CQ964|sv|e|mb|p|mb|p|mb|1D|mb|p|nt|hedyg: then Nunes could have disced his @c and eventually ruff a @c later since Fantoni had a natural @s trick|pg||
mb|2C|an|.|nt|ballebodk: if fantoni have taken h9 and played d J the contract would have been one down. i think nunes is a litte &%¤% right now as he found the right defense but pard ..... |pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: yes Fantoni didnt see it|pg||
mb|2S|mb|p|mb|2N|nt|hedyg: on the other hand, Nunes could have saved the situation by playing a 2nd @H, not a @c|pg||
nt|hedyg: i think it would have been still -1|pg||
mb|p|mb|3D|nt|hedyg: so it took the 2 of them ...|pg||
mb|p|mb|3H|mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|mb|3N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|ballebodk: are you sure - if garvey trumfs and play club right away i think he is home again |pg||
nt|hedyg: of course i am not sure :)|pg||
pc|s5|nt|hedyg: 1@D= 14+ forcing 1 round|pg||
nt|hedyg: 2@c was natural . gf|pg||
nt|vugraphpl8: http://www.poznan2011.pl/|pg||
nt|ballebodk: should bee a borring 3 NT from our point, as when d is 3-3 there are at least 9 tricks|pg||
nt|henryb:  with very friendly @d, Fantoni has 9 tricks|pg||
pc|s8|pc|s9|pc|s2|pg||
nt|vugraphpl8: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrleaderb.html|pg||
nt|hedyg: thanks Michal :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl8: :)|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h3|nt|hedyg: Garvey looking for killing defense|pg||
pc|h8|pc|hA|pg||
nt|hedyg: this is NOT it|pg||
nt|vugraphpl8: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orr7t1-1.htm|pg||
nt|eamongall: don't think there was any killing defence this time |pg||
nt|hedyg: Mossop in 2NT only|pg||
nt|hedyg: making 4|pg||
nt|ballebodk: nope but his comunicationslines is bad so i think he has to decide very what do play on - could he win with d 4-2 if sp A is in place ? wtith 1 s, 3h, 3, 2c |pg||
nt|ballebodk: *soon|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d6|pc|dQ|pc|d3|pg||
pc|dA|pc|dT|pc|d5|pc|d4|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c8|pc|cK|pc|c4|pg||
pc|dK|pc|dJ|pc|c3|pc|d9|pg||
pc|d7|nt|hedyg: disc @cs and exit with K@H and @H|pg||
nt|eamongall: hi eamon. if east switches to @ds a mere mortal would begin to sweat.... to quote bernix |pg||
nt|hedyg: wait for opps to give you rest|pg||
nt|hedyg: Fantoni is not a mere mortal :p|pg||
pc|c6|nt|eamongall: garvey got some tough @C discarding to do here to save overs|pg||
nt|ballebodk: its at little odd that the stopped in 2NT with 16hp+10hp - these guys normally bid 3 NT on 23-24 ballanced !|pg||
pc|s3|pc|cJ|pg||
pc|d8|pc|c9|pc|c5|pc|c7|pg||
pc|hK|nt|hedyg: maybe Mossop didnt get the message that 2@H showed a good hand|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|c3|st||md|1S32HT763DAQCAT532,SQ765H854DT93CJ87,SKT84HAK9DK8752CK,SAJ9HQJ2DJ64CQ964|sv|e|nt|runnerup: took 10 -so -1 imp|pg||
mb|p|nt|bagman: EW are currently 4th fighting for a medal|pg||
mb|p|mb|1D|mb|p|nt|jbgood: looks like a peaceful 3 NT by N|pg||
nt|jbgood: or S for that matter|pg||
mb|1H|mb|p|mb|1S|nt|runnerup: normal 4 @h = with no other ideas -from anyone -looks like it ,but..|pg||
mb|p|mb|1N|nt|bagman: Rimsted clearly gambling with her heart suit|pg||
nt|davpro: yes. 9 easy tricks, but not the best communications...|pg||
nt|jbgood: 1 nt - 2 @h - 2 NT - 3 NT?|pg||
mb|p|nt|Gerben42:  some would call it practical :)|pg||
nt|bridge_one: all colors taked by weak players :)|pg||
nt|bridge_one: North bid both, @D and @H|pg||
mb|2H|mb|p|mb|2N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|jbgood: N should know that the @c king counts for full - and bid 3 imo|pg||
pc|s6|nt|davpro: They stopped low, but if @ds are not 3-3 a higher contract would be a struggle|pg||
pc|s8|pc|s9|pc|s2|pg||
pc|c4|nt|Gerben42:  with a bit more fortune it would have been a claimer|pg||
nt|bagman: In pairs it might not be that practical as the bonus for the game is not that big as in teams|pg||
pc|c2|nt|bridge_one: duck this @D could be a idea|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Gives the same result, if South plays safe|pg||
nt|bridge_one: but give at south the chance to fault|pg||
pc|c7|pc|cK|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Absolutely|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d4|pc|dA|pc|d3|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d9|pc|d5|pc|d6|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h4|pc|hA|pc|h2|pg||
pc|dK|pc|dJ|pc|c3|pc|dT|pg||
nt|jbgood: the point is that you create swings when you dont bid games on 26 combined |pg||
pc|d7|pc|c6|pc|c5|nt|davpro: To be fair against N. 2N from S was perhaps a bit low (aswell)|pg||
pc|cJ|pg||
pc|d8|nt|jbgood: I am sure this wil be a game swing for Angelini|pg||
pc|c9|pc|h6|pc|c8|pg||
pc|hK|pc|hJ|pc|h7|pc|h5|pg||
pc|h9|pc|hQ|pc|hT|pc|h8|pg||
nt|jbgood: it shows 10-11 hcps nevertheless|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|cA|pc|s5|pc|s4|pg||
pc|cT|pc|s7|pc|sT|pc|sJ|pg||
pc|s3|pc|sQ|pc|sK|pc|sA|pg||
pg||
qx|o4|st||md|2SQT763H75DQT95C98,SJ952HK8DK832CKJ7,SAK8HAQJT4DJCT432,S4H9632DA764CAQ65|sv|b|nt|hedyg: else Zivkovic would have passed 1NT|pg||
nt|ballebodk: anyway - when you make mistakes and it only cost 6 imps you are a lucky guy :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: running scores:http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
mb|1C|mb|1H|nt|hedyg: running scores: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
nt|hedyg: thats better|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|s4|nt|eamongall: should be able to gather in 7 tricks here for a double part score swing and 4-5 imps |pg||
pc|s6|pc|s9|pc|sA|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c5|pc|c8|pc|cJ|pg||
nt|ballebodk: i bet that garvey have no way to show this hand - its bad: no other M, no suit, no stopper, but 10 hp so its not nice to pass|pg||
nt|henryb:  I only see 6 tricks, but I am usually blind|pg||
nt|hedyg: seems E had no bid|pg||
pc|h8|pc|hJ|pc|h6|pc|h5|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c6|pc|c9|pc|cK|pg||
nt|hedyg: 1@c= 11-13 balanced or any 17+ does not show any @cs |pg||
pc|hK|pc|hA|nt|ballebodk: N lead h Q - so there is your 7th trick :)|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h7|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h2|pc|d5|nt|eamongall: Carroll reluctant to play @Ss |pg||
nt|eamongall: Nunes will eventually take one of his chances to make |pg||
pc|d2|pg||
pc|hT|pc|h9|pc|d9|nt|hedyg: with 17+ Carroll would bid again, 2@c is out of the question with just 4 cards, 1NT without a stopper and singleton @s as well, he just had no bid|pg||
pc|d3|pg||
pc|sK|pc|d4|pc|s3|pc|s2|pg||
nt|henryb:  would 1@s have shown values without spades? Or would it show spades?|pg||
nt|eamongall: Carroll Garvey had chances to tie this board but will now lose 5 imps |pg||
nt|hedyg: here is their CC , Henry: http://www.ecatsbridge.org/documents/files/ConventionCards/2008MindSportGamesBeijing/Open/Ireland/garvey-carroll.pdf|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|d6|pc|dT|pc|dK|pg||
nt|hedyg: they dont see to play xfer bids|pg||
pc|d8|nt|ballebodk: i think most of us play with: x = 4 sp and 1 sp 5+ spade - but thats maybe waste of space ? |pg||
pc|h4|pc|d7|pc|dQ|pg||
pc|s8|pc|cA|pc|sQ|pc|s5|pg||
mc|8|nt|hedyg: or better they do, but as of 1NT|pg||
pg||
qx|c4|st||md|2SQT763H75DQT95C98,SJ952HK8DK832CKJ7,SAK8HAQJT4DJCT432,S4H9632DA764CAQ65|sv|b|nt|bagman: with both spades and diamonds open 3NT requires some luck|pg||
nt|davpro: So, with less and 3-4-1-5 distibution he would always pass?|pg||
nt|jbgood: yes|pg||
mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|nt|bridge_one: same defence in other room |pg||
mb|p|mb|1N|nt|bridge_one: 2@H is limited at 9 hcp 3 cards raise|pg||
mb|p|nt|runnerup: you have to guess well to make 4 @h -but that is bedt|pg||
nt|hawe45:  A poor 4 @H - but you might be forced to "guess" right|pg||
nt|bridge_one: East is evaluating what bid|pg||
nt|runnerup: this @d lead asked may help to get rid off spade looser|pg||
nt|jbgood: choice between dbl and 1 NT...|pg||
nt|jbgood: pass never an option for Boye on a near opener|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|jbgood: but defense may start with 3 spades and 5 hearts|pg||
pc|hQ|nt|jbgood: not any more|pg||
nt|davpro: 8 quick tricks for defense here on a spade lead. 7 for declarer on that lead|pg||
nt|jbgood: 7 th in the bag|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h7|nt|bagman: Declarer needs to ruff the heart losers and discard a club on a diamond|pg||
nt|hawe45:  UNDO|pg||
pc|hK|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|c2|pc|c5|pc|c8|pg||
pc|cK|nt|runnerup: no fight now just posible over tricks |pg||
pc|c3|nt|bagman: The @DA must be with E: if W has it, then E has the clubs|pg||
nt|hawe45:  But how can you play bridge - NOT leading partners suit with Ace-x???|pg||
nt|hawe45:  You MUST have seen too many bad overcalls|pg||
nt|bridge_one: 2@H now|pg||
pc|c6|pc|c9|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c4|nt|hawe45:  Happy Christmas now|pg||
nt|bridge_one: push hand|pg||
nt|runnerup: looks srange but no spade losers went away |pg||
pc|cQ|pc|h5|pg||
nt|jbgood: as suggested Angeline bid and made 3 NT on the previous one|pg||
pc|cA|pc|d5|pc|d8|pc|cT|pg||
pc|d4|nt|jbgood: strange that N didnt try a big spade first...|pg||
pc|d9|pc|dK|pc|dJ|pg||
pc|d2|pc|s8|pc|dA|nt|bagman: Declarer wondering if he can throw E in for a club trick|pg||
pc|dT|pg||
nt|davpro: y|pg||
pc|h6|mc|7|pg||
qx|o5|st||md|3SQJ9763HA43DCAT95,S42HQ975DJ942CQJ6,SAT5HKT8DAQ83CK82,SK8HJ62DKT765C743|sv|n|mb|1C|nt|hedyg: and that would be after double, i dont know after an overcall|pg||
mb|p|mb|2S|an|.|mb|p|nt|eamongall: Mossop team have bid these to 6@S which seems hopeless to me as cards lie |pg||
mb|2N|nt|henryb:  It says they play negative doubles.|pg||
mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|mb|3S|an|.|mb|p|mb|4C|an|.|mb|p|mb|4D|mb|d|nt|henryb:  6@s needs the @s finesse and avoiding 2 @c losers|pg||
nt|ballebodk: 6 sp seems to hard - sp K has to be onside and then you also need a little extra in clubs !|pg||
mb|r|nt|henryb:  seems like too much to ask|pg||
nt|snorre: ...|pg||
mb|p|nt|henryb:  and it would be on this layout|pg||
mb|4H|mb|p|mb|4S|nt|hedyg: 1@c= 14+ nat or 15+ balanced, 2@s= gf with 5+ cards|pg||
nt|hedyg: 2NT relay|pg||
nt|henryb:  Sort of thing the other table might try since they need a BIG win|pg||
nt|hedyg: 3@d = short?|pg||
nt|hedyg: 3@s fixes @s, 4@c cue, 4@d cue, 4@h cue|pg||
nt|hedyg: XX should show 1st rd control|pg||
nt|hedyg: here void  ofc|pg||
nt|henryb:  On the other hand, this slam is about 35%, so far too good for a "Roland" slam|pg||
nt|ballebodk: but if rdbl shows 1. control then N know that his D most likely is wasted|pg||
mb|p|mb|5C|mb|p|nt|hedyg: any 5 level bid by Nunes would show an odd nr of keycards now|pg||
mb|6S|nt|hedyg: he is not counting the A@D opposite the void|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|d2|nt|hedyg: 4NT would have shown an even number of keycards (0 is even)|pg||
nt|hedyg: we have all been in worse slams|pg||
pc|d8|pc|dT|pc|s3|pg||
nt|henryb:  If the @dQ were the @cQ, this would be reasonable|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s2|pc|s5|pc|sK|pg||
pc|s8|pc|s6|pc|s4|pc|sA|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c4|pc|cA|pc|c6|pg||
pc|c5|pc|cJ|pc|cK|pc|c7|pg||
pc|c8|pc|c3|pc|c9|pc|cQ|pg||
nt|hedyg: on a good day QJ@C drop|pg||
mc|11|pg||
qx|c5|st||md|3SQJ9763HA43DCAT95,S42HQ975DJ942CQJ6,SAT5HKT8DAQ83CK82,SK8HJ62DKT765C743|sv|n|nt|Gerben42:  after 1@C the E hand is too big for 4@H I guess|pg||
nt|bagman: NS can make a minor suit slam|pg||
nt|bagman: Maybe EW have some Namyats type of device over 1m openings|pg||
nt|Gerben42:  3N-2 was only worth 20%|pg||
nt|Gerben42:  last round not finished yet?|pg||
nt|bagman: If N can show real clubs, S hand becomes very valuable with the source of tricks, heart control and trump support|pg||
nt|Gerben42:  if it starts 1@C 4@H, what does S bid?|pg||
nt|Gerben42:  4NT perhaps|pg||
nt|bagman: but E has a hand where she can prevent NS from changing that information. After 1@C, E can bid 4@H and then?|pg||
nt|Gerben42:  esp. tough if 1@C can be short (3 or even 2 cards)|pg||
nt|bagman: if 4NT shows primary diamonds and secondary clubs then it's the bid|pg||
nt|Gerben42:  the problem with such a bid is - what will pd think it is|pg||
nt|bagman: I wouldn't be surprised if there are some other agreements for the meaning of 4NT|pg||
nt|bagman: or no agreements :)|pg||
nt|Gerben42:  this is an area where regular partnerships are ahead of the game|pg||
nt|bagman: 6@HX is 500; it's better than the vulnerable game for EW so they might take the sac|pg||
nt|runnerup: 11 in both tables and we though how to make 10|pg||
mb|1N|nt|Gerben42:  something to be said for 5@H overcall too|pg||
nt|bridge_one: in 4@H in other match one made one down|pg||
nt|hawe45:  5 @D N/S should end the auction|pg||
mb|p|mb|2H|nt|bagman: against a strong 1@C 5@H would be fine|pg||
nt|runnerup: 3nt also,but ew can bid more|pg||
mb|p|mb|2S|nt|bridge_one: 5@D can be beated with @S lead|pg||
nt|runnerup: no just loose that|pg||
mb|p|nt|runnerup: small from table |pg||
nt|jbgood: some lucky day you make 6 @s on this lot - but not today|pg||
mb|3C|mb|p|mb|3S|nt|bridge_one: after pass at 5@C @S lead became possible|pg||
nt|hawe45:  Lightner...|pg||
nt|bridge_one: @S ruff, K @C - declarer lose the ruff, one @C and A@H|pg||
mb|p|nt|runnerup: ok wrong hand|pg||
nt|hawe45:  No right hand|pg||
nt|bridge_one: many pair use pass at 5@C like OK to lead @C, instead DBL means to lead in another suit|pg||
nt|bridge_one: but i don't know the gadget played by E/W|pg||
nt|jbgood: investigating for a club contract (slam?) and got no reaction of a positive kind |pg||
mb|4C|nt|runnerup: so it was all academical|pg||
mb|p|nt|bagman: Malinowski has very little defense and can hope that they go down only 3|pg||
mb|4D|mb|p|nt|bridge_one: now np|pg||
mb|4S|mb|p|nt|bagman: Good time to take the save; in pairs taking an 800 save against a making slam is not a way to win; normally you should take your chances and try to beat the slam|pg||
nt|jbgood: @d cue was what S did NOT want to get|pg||
mb|5S|nt|davpro: But from Ns view; doesn't it seem as if S hasn't got a @h cue?|pg||
mb|p|mb|6S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|jbgood: N looks to take no notice...|pg||
nt|jbgood: S bid well - N somewhat undiciplined - slam is more like a Roland one (which in the old days would be called a Norwegian slam)|pg||
pc|h6|nt|davpro: This could take a while, but will end with 1 down...|pg||
nt|jbgood: If N has the @c Q in stead of the @d Q his hand would be better though|pg||
pc|hA|nt|bagman: (unless the slam is such that everybody bids and makes it)|pg||
pc|h5|pc|h8|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|s2|pc|s5|pc|sK|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c5|pc|cQ|pc|cK|pg||
nt|jbgood: another swing for Angelini i reckon|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s8|pc|s3|pc|s4|pg||
nt|jbgood: running scores here: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
nt|davpro: Kopecky made 6@s against Rosenthal on the j of @c lead...|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d5|pc|s6|pc|d2|pg||
pc|s7|pc|h7|pc|sT|pc|d6|pg||
pc|d8|pc|d7|pc|s9|pc|d4|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h9|pc|hK|pc|h2|pg||
pc|dA|pc|dT|pc|h4|pc|d9|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c3|pc|c9|pc|cJ|pg||
mc|11|pg||
qx|o6|st||md|4S43HAKJ64DAQ8C732,SAJ952H83D97CKJ84,S8HQT952D2CAQT965,SKQT76H7DKJT6543C|sv|e|nt|hedyg: didnt go for the squeeze|pg||
nt|henryb:  or there is a stiff @c honor and you guess the right way|pg||
nt|hedyg: i dont know if there is a carryover to the Swiss teams. anybody?|pg||
nt|ballebodk: how high will we fly on this one ?|pg||
nt|henryb:  there was not in the Mixed|pg||
mb|1D|mb|1H|mb|1S|nt|snorre: The first 27 teams of Swiss A and the first 5 teams of Swiss B will qualify for the K.O. phase without a carry-over.|pg||
nt|hedyg: in the mixed teams the carryover was 3 , 2 ,1 David Greenwood tells me|pg||
nt|eamongall: probably something like 3 VPS for group leaders |pg||
nt|ballebodk: didnt the groupwinners get 3 kp in the mixed ?  |pg||
nt|hedyg: or 2,1,0 lol|pg||
nt|hedyg: 1st get 3|pg||
nt|henryb:  sorry, it was 3, 1, 0|pg||
nt|hedyg: ty Snorre!|pg||
mb|4H|nt|vugraphpl8: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orr7t1-1.htm|pg||
mb|4S|nt|hedyg: thanks Michal|pg||
nt|snorre: I have made a copy from the official rules and regulations...   :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: ahhhhh!|pg||
mb|p|nt|snorre: so they say there....|pg||
mb|p|mb|5C|mb|5H|nt|hedyg: http://www.poznan2011.pl/files/imce/Rules_and_Regulations.pdf?1|pg||
nt|eamongall: i returned yesterday from poznan. group winners shall get 3 vps carryover and cannot be drawn against other 1sts.... quote bernix |pg||
nt|snorre: http://www.poznan2011.pl/files/imce/Rules_and_Regulations.pdf?1   Page 11...|pg||
nt|eamongall: there it is in a nutshell ...|pg||
mb|p|nt|snorre: sry. page 8   :)|pg||
nt|henryb:  I think this auction is not quite correct|pg||
mb|5S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|d|nt|hedyg: Nunes should have shown his @cs|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|hedyg: maybe something like 4@c= @C+@H|pg||
pc|cA|nt|hedyg: oy!|pg||
nt|henryb:  850!|pg||
nt|hedyg: there goes the @H loser|pg||
pc|s6|pc|c3|pc|c4|pg||
nt|poerknight: hm|pg||
nt|hedyg: the only lead|pg||
pc|s7|pc|s4|pc|s9|pc|s8|pg||
nt|ballebodk: nice to see other persons lead as bad as me :)|pg||
nt|henryb:  No, any club|pg||
pc|sA|pc|c5|pc|sQ|pc|s3|pg||
nt|hedyg: you should see my leads :(|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c6|pc|h7|pc|c2|pg||
pc|d9|pc|d2|pc|d3|nt|eamongall: looks to me like boye has slipped in other room and Mossop is looking at making 6@Hs |pg||
nt|eamongall: no @C ruff came |pg||
nt|eamongall: and I think Carroll only now loses 3 @Ds here |pg||
nt|eamongall: 2 @Ds |pg||
nt|eamongall: so will be imp wastage |pg||
nt|henryb:  Is 20 imps ever wastage?|pg||
nt|eamongall: somewhere around 18 imps it was .... but Mossop failed to get home |pg||
nt|henryb:  so only 13|pg||
nt|eamongall: he seemed to play for 2-2 @Cs with !K onside |pg||
pc|dQ|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h8|pc|h2|pc|sT|pg||
pc|dK|pc|dA|pc|d7|nt|eamongall: finessed @CQ first round |pg||
pc|c9|pg||
nt|brolucius: Rodwell made 6@H doubled with an overtrick on a @D3 lead from East. The suit preference lead made it clear how to play the clubs.|pg||
mc|11|nt|snorre: From rules & regulations: After RR: "The team ranked 1st in each section will receive a carryover of 3 VP and the team ranked 2nd a carryover of 1 VP". No CarryOver when starting ...|pg||
nt|snorre: K.O's|pg||
nt|hedyg: that sure was a killerboard!|pg||
nt|hedyg: thanks Snorre :)|pg||
pg||
qx|c6|st||md|4S43HAKJ64DAQ8C732,SAJ952H83D97CKJ84,S8HQT952D2CAQT965,SKQT76H7DKJT6543C|sv|e|nt|bagman: If declarer planned to steal a the spade, she should have tried it before drawing trumps; the early play should have been either the steal attempt or claim -3 :)|pg||
nt|bridge_one: in other room the auction was different, so the lead was @C|pg||
nt|jbgood: nice major fits around the table|pg||
nt|jbgood: I may just have to stand corrected - i am told that Angelini in the OR also bid to 6 @s|pg||
nt|davpro: There will be (high) bidding :)|pg||
mb|3D|mb|3H|mb|p|mb|4D|nt|bridge_one: 3@H for N/S and 3@S for E/W here|pg||
nt|runnerup: may end for double partscore swing|pg||
mb|p|nt|bridge_one: 2@H open probably 10/12 constructive (and 2@D multi)|pg||
nt|davpro: When preempting with 3 in a minor you normally do not have a 4 card major. Nothing said about 5 card suits :)|pg||
mb|4H|nt|jbgood: hehe|pg||
mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|nt|bagman: Having showed 44 majors and getting no reaction from partner, W could show his 3 card support expecting to be in a decent trump suit|pg||
mb|5D|nt|eamongall: If anybody is following a pair you can find their probable table from the following |pg||
nt|jbgood: Boye may lead a club now and get a plus score ag 5|pg||
mb|p|nt|bagman: S wants to compete but the majors are behind her so she gives up|pg||
nt|bridge_one: Q@C help ,,, opps |pg||
mb|6H|mb|p|nt|bridge_one: OK|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|jbgood: even 6@h a good save over 4@s:)|pg||
nt|jbgood: spade ace and a club takes it 1 down|pg||
nt|davpro: Defense better take their tricks at once...|pg||
pc|sA|nt|jbgood: north really bid his hand to the limit:)|pg||
pc|s8|pc|s6|nt|eamongall: We are covering tables 8-15 as shown  on the results web page ... so the bottom 8 lines are tables H G F E A B C D in that order |pg||
nt|jbgood: @s 6 for a club now|pg||
pc|s3|pg||
nt|jbgood: Boye should be able to read that|pg||
pc|d9|pc|d2|pc|dK|nt|eamongall: http://b.poznan2011.pl/mxp/fa.html|pg||
pc|dA|pg||
nt|davpro: E could hold 764 from W view|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d7|pc|c5|nt|eamongall: this is table 13 of 15 in play tables and 3rd line from bottom of scoresheet |pg||
pc|d3|pg||
nt|jbgood: but difficult to think that prd has 5 spades (and a @c void...)|pg||
pc|d8|pc|s2|pc|h9|nt|bagman: Now E can ruff the diamond and try the heart to the K|pg||
nt|eamongall: Most pairs move to the table of the pair below them next ... ie 12 goes where 11 used to be |pg||
pc|d4|pg||
nt|jbgood: no - then the 7 for his known strenth|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h7|pc|hK|pc|h3|pg||
pc|s4|pc|s5|pc|hT|pc|s7|pg||
nt|bagman: The heart attempt is likely to fail as N has shown @DA and @CK already|pg||
pc|h5|pc|d5|pc|hJ|nt|bagman: but there was nothing better to try|pg||
pc|h8|pg||
nt|davpro: From declarer view E has got 2+@c, so @c to T is the only thing that might work|pg||
pc|c2|nt|bagman: NS currently the 7th; EW about that much from the bottom|pg||
pc|c4|pc|cQ|nt|bridge_one: J @H A K and @C would discard a @D over the good @C in the dummy|pg||
nt|davpro: what do I know...|pg||
pc|d6|pg||
mc|11|pg||
qx|c7|st||md|1SQ5432HJDT53CJT98,ST8H653DAJ97CA654,SAK96H94DQ8642CK3,SJ7HAKQT872DKCQ72|sv|b|nt|hawe45:  4 @S making - good luck|pg||
nt|jbgood: playing for the singleton jack with E:) |pg||
nt|davpro: @c to T was obviously wrong if E has 2 @c...I'm sleeping|pg||
nt|jbgood: not the precentage play:)|pg||
nt|davpro: no- @c 2-2|pg||
nt|jbgood: yes|pg||
nt|jbgood: sleeping too:)|pg||
mb|p|nt|bridge_one: 5@H 2 down|pg||
mb|p|mb|1D|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|nt|bridge_one: 4@S correct bid !|pg||
mb|p|nt|jbgood: 5@s made on the unfortunate lead of the @c ace next door|pg||
nt|jbgood: doubled to boot|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|c4|nt|runnerup: north has not found hearts obfiously -so svedish increasing lead perhaps|pg||
pc|cK|nt|bagman: E doesn't want to lead from her collection|pg||
nt|bagman: Every card might be right or wrong|pg||
pc|c2|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s7|pc|s4|pc|s8|pg||
pc|sK|pc|sJ|pc|s2|pc|sT|pg||
pc|c3|pc|cQ|pc|c8|pc|c5|pg||
mc|10|nt|hawe45:  Trump-lead, North then ducked the @D...|pg||
pg||
qx|o8|st||md|2SKJ54HA64D43CAT43,ST2HJ87DA987CJ765,SA8763HKQT32DQ6C2,SQ9H95DKJT52CKQ98|sv|o|nt|hedyg: surely W is too|pg||
nt|ballebodk: i for sure had bid one on W|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: OR N opened 1@d and Angelini bid 4@H|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|mb|2C|mb|p|mb|2D|mb|d|mb|2N|mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|mb|4D|mb|d|nt|hedyg: 1@s= 14+ f1 or 9(11)+ if with @hs|pg||
mb|4H|nt|hedyg: 2@C= gf balanced or @cs or with fit|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: 2@d= relay|pg||
mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|dT|nt|hedyg: begging for @d lead|pg||
pc|d3|pc|dA|pc|d6|pg||
nt|eamongall: q@c was  %  play  20% to 17%   in the 6@Hs a few boards ago in other room I am told ... from peterh |pg||
pc|d7|pc|dQ|pc|dK|pc|d4|pg||
pc|cK|nt|ballebodk: nice this time the found out that BOTH opps have a diamond lead so slam was not likely to win :)|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c5|pc|c2|pg||
pc|s4|pc|s2|pc|sA|pc|s9|pg||
pc|s3|pc|sQ|nt|hedyg: i wonder what 2NT meant|pg||
pc|sK|pc|sT|pg||
nt|hedyg: must be fit in @s|pg||
mc|11|pg||
qx|c8|st||md|2SKJ54HA64D43CAT43,ST2HJ87DA987CJ765,SA8763HKQT32DQ6C2,SQ9H95DKJT52CKQ98|sv|o|nt|eamongall: My good friends here McGann and Brown |pg||
nt|eamongall: they owe me several pints of guiness |pg||
nt|bridge_one: 4@S made in other room ecause duck the A in @D|pg||
nt|jbgood: 4@s and coffee time|pg||
nt|davpro: I've got coffee all the time :)|pg||
mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|3N!|nt|runnerup: nothing should happen here but ..|pg||
mb|p|mb|4S|nt|Walddk2: Welcome to Barbara Apel|pg||
nt|barbyh: hi all, Barbara from Las vegas|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|eamongall: a decent score for NS for 1NT up 2 on board 7 |pg||
nt|bagman: The spade lead was unlucky for NS|pg||
mb|p|nt|eamongall: well there is a generous lead from McGann he won;t be happy |pg||
nt|hawe45:  A fast - flat - board|pg||
pc|h9|nt|bridge_one: i bet 10 tricks here :)|pg||
pc|h4|pc|hJ|pc|hK|pg||
pc|s3|pc|s9|nt|barbyh: could have heldthem to 1 less|pg||
nt|bagman: There is a theory, which states that against blind 3NT one should lead from the worse 4-carder from a 4432|pg||
nt|barbyh: against matchpoints or imps?|pg||
nt|bagman: both|pg||
nt|bagman: I don't subscribe to that theory but I was told that it was backed up by a huge simulation|pg||
nt|eamongall: The good news for McGann on the last board is some 3NT+2 company is appearing ...|pg||
nt|bagman: who knows; at least it makes leading easy|pg||
nt|barbyh: true, |pg||
nt|barbyh: well in this case lead from a club and you holdthemto 4|pg||
nt|bagman: The diamond lead (suggested by the theory) holds the contract to 4, too|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s2|pg||
pc|s4|pc|sT|pc|sA|pc|sQ|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h5|pc|hA|mc|13|nt|davpro: the @d losers vanished|pg||
nt|jbgood: not easy to find the @d lead|pg||
nt|davpro: nope|pg||
pg||
qx|o9|st||md|3ST62HK764DKJ8CJ42,SA7H53D64CAKQT876,SKJ98HAJDT9752C95,SQ543HQT982DAQ3C3|sv|e|mb|p|mb|1H|mb|p|mb|2C|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|3C|mb|p|mb|3N|nt|ballebodk: an easy 3 NT - if - E can tell he have a subminimum opening !|pg||
mb|p|nt|hedyg: nice to play 2@c gf and be able to repeat the suit|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|pc|s6|pc|s7|pc|sK|pc|s3|pg||
nt|hedyg: Brogeland playing 3@c|pg||
pc|dT|pc|dA|pc|d8|pc|d4|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c2|pc|cA|pc|c5|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c9|pc|s4|nt|hedyg: obviously amisunderstanding|pg||
pc|c4|pg||
mc|9|nt|hedyg: 1@H-2@c-2@d-3@c-p|pg||
pg||
qx|c9|st||md|3ST62HK764DKJ8CJ42,SA7H53D64CAKQT876,SKJ98HAJDT9752C95,SQ543HQT982DAQ3C3|sv|e|nt|bagman: I probably would have lead the @S, too :( (maybe there's something in that theory, after all)|pg||
nt|hawe45:  West must play this 3 NT|pg||
mb|p|nt|runnerup: 3nt in wrong hand so chance for Zaleski|pg||
nt|hawe45:  South led a small @C, but East had to go wrong|pg||
mb|1H|nt|bridge_one: no|pg||
mb|p|nt|bridge_one: 1@D 3@D easy ...|pg||
nt|runnerup: 3nt opening not everyones choice|pg||
mb|2C!|mb|p|mb|2D!|mb|p|mb|3C|nt|runnerup: winnig some ipms strange way|pg||
nt|hawe45:  To miss this 5 @D - played by West - will bring Zaleski  8 IMP|pg||
nt|jbgood: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html enables you to follow the exciting fights for 3rd place in some of the groups|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|bagman: W has so much extras that he can afford to bid the game in NT instead of looking for the spades|pg||
nt|jbgood: 3 teams go to the A Swiss - and the others to B|pg||
pc|dT|nt|davpro: 9 tricks in NT here|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|dK|pc|d4|pg||
nt|bridge_one: 4@D great choice by Versace|pg||
pc|d8|pc|d6|nt|runnerup: perhaps even he didnt expect mojor Q eens to table |pg||
pc|d2|pc|dA|pg||
pc|c3|pc|c2|pc|cK|pc|c5|pg||
nt|jbgood: i guess they play 2@c as game force - but not sure. if so, E may have regretted his pass, 3 nt always on|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c9|pc|h2|pc|c4|pg||
pc|cQ|nt|bagman: Even with the bad club break, declarer has 11 tricks losing only the two aces and scoring well in the pairs|pg||
pc|d5|pc|s3|nt|bagman: sry, the spades break also badly.... |pg||
pc|cJ|pg||
nt|jbgood: perhaps E just took a shot with his meager values|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|o10|st||md|4SQ64HKT2DK973CT84,S753HQ873D85CAQ32,S982H65DAT64CKJ75,SAKJTHAJ94DQJ2C96|sv|b|nt|hedyg: last board of this match now|pg||
mb|1N|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl8: next match at 17.00|pg||
pc|d3|nt|hedyg: thanks to our outstanding operator in Poznan, Michal!to my excellent fellow commentators Eamon, Henry and Tom for donating their time and expertise to guide us through these ...|pg||
nt|hedyg: boards.our appreciation to the EBL and the PBF for bringing this event to BBO, especially Slawek Latala  who was intrumental in organizing these broadcasts on behalf of BBO|pg||
pc|d5|pc|dA|pc|d2|pg||
nt|ballebodk: that must be nice for Brogeland, he gives it one more shot after slam, and what then left in partscore !! |pg||
pc|d4|pc|dQ|pc|dK|pc|d8|pg||
pc|d9|nt|hedyg: special thanks to our specs for joining and for your kind and helpful comments,we hope you enjoyed the show|pg||
pc|c2|pc|dT|pc|dJ|pg||
nt|hedyg: we will be back in ca 2 hours|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h2|pc|h3|pc|h5|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s4|pc|s3|pc|s2|pg||
pc|hJ|pc|hK|pc|h8|pc|h6|pg||
pc|d7|pc|c3|pc|d6|pc|c6|pg||
pc|c4|pc|cQ|pc|cK|pc|c9|pg||
pc|c5|pc|sT|pc|c8|pc|cA|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|s8|pc|h4|pc|hT|pg||
pc|s5|pc|s9|pc|sJ|mc|7|nt|hedyg: http://b.poznan2011.pl/ot/orrrunda7.html|pg||
nt|hedyg: ?|pg||
nt|hedyg: ok lets trust the result, not the play :)|pg||
nt|hedyg: see you all later!|pg||
pg||
qx|c10|st||md|4SQ64HKT2DK973CT84,S753HQ873D85CAQ32,S982H65DAT64CKJ75,SAKJTHAJ94DQJ2C96|sv|b|nt|jbgood: last one in the round robin |pg||
nt|jbgood: and cards lie badly for EW|pg||
mb|1C|mb|p|mb|2D!|mb|p|mb|2N|mb|p|mb|3C!|nt|bagman: EW can make here 10 tricks in NT on a club lead 11 tricks otherwise|pg||
mb|p|mb|4D|nt|davpro: What have I missed in the bidding?|pg||
mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|bagman: E bid 3NT to show the spade stopper in case W was interested in that; If W had a huge @H raise, he would not pass 3NT|pg||
nt|davpro: W probably showed a M?|pg||
nt|davpro: 2@d balanced hand , 3@c a major, 4@d ask major  (according to a kib)|pg||
nt|jbgood: probably|pg||
pc|d6|pc|dQ|pc|d7|pc|d5|pg||
nt|jbgood: the curse of underleading aces|pg||
nt|davpro: :)|pg||
nt|jbgood: but still down|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d3|pc|d8|pc|dT|pg||
pc|dA|pc|dJ|pc|d9|nt|bagman: Declarer is going to run the diamonds hoping for too many heart discards|pg||
pc|h3|pg||
pc|s5|nt|runnerup: killing lead |pg||
pc|s8|pc|sT|pc|sQ|pg||
nt|davpro: Does S know who has got the @d 4?|pg||
pc|c4|pc|cQ|pc|cK|pc|c6|pg||
pc|c5|pc|c9|nt|bagman: There's no legitimate squeeze but it costs nothing to try|pg||
pc|cT|pc|cA|pg||
nt|davpro: I need some sleep. Thx all kibs for pointing out my stupidity|pg||
nt|dburn: I doubt he cares all that much about the four, given what happened to the ace|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h5|pc|h4|pc|hK|pg||
pc|h2|mc|9|nt|jbgood: bye all|pg||
nt|davpro: bye all. I enjoyed as always.|pg||
pg||
