vg|A EC 2011 Mixed Teams Round Robin,2_5,I,11,20,Couples,0,Zarkesch,0|
rs|6CW-2,3NW+1,4HW-3,1SSx-1,5CN+1,3NN-2,4SNx-1,4SNx-2,4DS-1,4HWx-2,4HNx-2,3SE=,3DW=,2SE=,4HW-1,4HW-1,3SW+1,4SW=,5DW+1,6DW=|
pn|Taczewska,Boeddeker,Taczewski,Zarkesch,VECHIATTO,Busse P,Engel,Busse G|pg||
qx|c11|st||md|1ST92H84DA9432C964,SKJ43HAK97DQCKQ83,SQ865HQJ53DJT8C75,SA7HT62DK765CAJT2|sv|o|nt|oliverc: Given the K@H with North, perhaps it would have been more sensible to cash the|pg||
nt|oliverc: A@D after the A@H and then lead Ace and a small @S. If South wins, more likely to|pg||
nt|oliverc: find the A@C with North and South might have been endplayed anyway|pg||
nt|brotherp: funny result in open room|pg||
mb|p|nt|brotherp: weak nt or maybe upgraded because of the nice features|pg||
nt|brotherp: tactical decision needed by East|pg||
nt|brotherp: 3@d anyone?|pg||
nt|bobholl: marion thinks long :)|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: sure...and an unusual aution in other room|pg||
mb|1C|an| |nt|roswolf: a good weak 2?|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: good player, though|pg||
mb|p|mb|2S!|nt|roswolf: hi all|pg||
mb|p|mb|3N|nt|brotherp: dbl showing a 4 card major and a longer minor; quite a common treatment in NL|pg||
nt|roswolf: in the slam zone just about|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|brotherp: 3@d now ?!|pg||
nt|bobholl: guess marion will bid 3@D now|pg||
pc|hQ|nt|roswolf: but 6@C is no thing of beauty |pg||
nt|roswolf: 3nt is certainly a normal contract|pg||
pc|h2|nt|roswolf: again all very normal|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: pas seems to turn out ok|pg||
nt|brotherp: remarkable decision imo; anyway 2@h will handle nicely also - barring the unfindable trump lead|pg||
pc|h4|nt|roswolf: not really many hands of interest - the dealing computer on strike perhaps!?|pg||
nt|bobholl: paulissen contemplating and still thinking|pg||
nt|roswolf: with no poor breaks any reasonable line works|pg||
nt|roswolf: still he has to plan for a rainy day|pg||
nt|bobholl: he has only 9 tricks if everything breaks without a @D ruff so i guess he'll try that|pg||
nt|bobholl: gib says 11 tricks but he sees 52 cards (just like we :))|pg||
nt|roswolf: probably cdonsidering the diamond guess|pg||
nt|bobholl: meike (wortel) THINKS LONG AND LEADS A @h|pg||
nt|brotherp: excellent lead :>|pg||
pc|hA|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: ok now, though|pg||
nt|roswolf: and doesnt seem to be too difficult|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d8|nt|wilkinsona: oh, right|pg||
pc|d5|pc|dA|pg||
pc|h8|pc|h7|pc|hJ|pc|h6|pg||
pc|h3|pc|hT|nt|bobholl: now @H and @D ??|pg||
nt|roswolf: trump now will cause a bit of anguish|pg||
nt|pelu: 2@S prob @C-support, but singleton @DQ?|pg||
pc|d2|pc|hK|pg||
pc|s3|pc|s5|nt|bobholl: @C now and another @D ?|pg||
nt|bobholl: he is lucky that the @S 6 is now high enough|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes|pg||
nt|bobholl: will play @C now surely|pg||
nt|bobholl: but if yuo switch @D A and @C Q ??|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s2|pg||
pc|s7|pc|s9|pc|sJ|pc|sQ|pg||
nt|roswolf: well i think he is thinking far too much - especially when there is an obvious line|pg||
mc|10|nt|roswolf: yes indeed|pg||
pg||
qx|o12|st||md|2SAQJ43HT3D84CAJ76,SKT975H4DAK32C532,S86HK986DT975CQT8,S2HAQJ752DQJ6CK94|sv|n|nt|daman: and here we go|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|mb|2C|nt|daman: undo?|pg||
nt|daman: or do they play relay?|pg||
mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|2S|nt|Walddk2: Contract is 1@SX in the closed room|pg||
mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|nt|Walddk2: West passed, East opened 1@H, 1@S overcall pass pass, double, all pass|pg||
mb|3H|an| |nt|daman: starnge auction so far here|pg||
mb|p|nt|daman: strange*|pg||
mb|3S|an| |mb|p|mb|4H|nt|daman: must be a backhanded relay system|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: http://www.poznan2011.pl/|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: schedule http://www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://r.poznan2011.pl/mxt/rrleaderb.html|pg||
pc|cT|pc|cK|pc|cA|pc|c5|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c3|pc|cQ|pc|c4|pg||
pc|c8|pc|c9|pc|cJ|pc|c2|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s5|pc|s6|pc|s2|pg||
pc|d4|pc|dA|pc|d5|pc|d6|pg||
nt|daman: an inauspicious start to the match|pg||
pc|h4|pc|h6|pc|hQ|pc|h3|pg||
pc|hA|pc|hT|pc|s7|pc|h8|pg||
pc|h2|nt|daman: only 3 down|pg||
mc|7|pg||
qx|c12|st||md|2SAQJ43HT3D84CAJ76,SKT975H4DAK32C532,S86HK986DT975CQT8,S2HAQJ752DQJ6CK94|sv|n|nt|bobholl: they are in time trouble now so arbiter will come (later)|pg||
nt|roswolf: hmm trappy deal|pg||
mb|p|nt|pelu: spec when West will open 1@s|pg||
mb|p|mb|1H|nt|bobholl: 3 !! not afraid|pg||
nt|pelu: ok :) wrong - again :(|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|nt|roswolf: west might have opened|pg||
mb|p|nt|wilkinsona: same auction both tables|pg||
nt|brotherp: difficult play hand yet again|pg||
mb|d|nt|Walddk2: South African Texas = hearts|pg||
nt|roswolf: west passing 1@S is optimistic|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: yup boring bd to finish with|pg||
nt|Walddk2: http://www.bridgeguys.com/Conventions/TexasSouthAfrican.html|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|brotherp: @c lead more or less kills the defence ...impossible to play the 9  it seems|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: can afford to lose 2 spades it seems|pg||
nt|roswolf: logically should pass now|pg||
pc|h4|nt|pelu: 4-5 defensive tricks and pd did open|pg||
pc|h6|pc|hJ|pc|hT|pg||
nt|roswolf: -1 or -2 |pg||
nt|pelu: 3x@D best defense now|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h3|pc|c5|pc|h8|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: the heart J may worry declarer ..|pg||
nt|brotherp: well the @c lead took care of most problems; on a spade or trump lead this looks like an uphill struggle for declarer|pg||
nt|bobholl: @H 41 may be she thinks|pg||
nt|bobholl: than @DK is needed for 3d @S|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c6|pc|c2|pc|c8|pg||
pc|cT|nt|pelu: ???|pg||
pc|c9|nt|bobholl: nasty surprise in @H won't make anymore|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c3|pg||
pc|s6|nt|bobholl: now she 's made herself trump short|pg||
pc|s2|pc|sA|pc|s5|pg||
nt|brotherp: still ok with both spades in North and only 3@d's - some anxious moments though|pg||
pc|sJ|pc|sK|pc|s8|pc|h2|pg||
nt|pelu: why not discard a sure @D loser on @HK?|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d5|nt|bobholl: 8 of @H now |pg||
pc|d6|pc|d4|pg||
nt|oliverc: hmmm|pg||
pc|sT|nt|brotherp: mmm|pg||
nt|bobholl: @C ruff beats it|pg||
nt|oliverc: :)|pg||
nt|oliverc: lucky|pg||
pc|d7|nt|oliverc: Something of a comedy of errors there|pg||
nt|vugraphzhd: A short break|pg||
nt|brotherp: indeed|pg||
nt|brotherp: after the club lead declarer only needs hearts 3-2|pg||
pc|h5|nt|roswolf: looked odd for sure|pg||
pc|sQ|pg||
pc|cA|pc|s7|pc|cQ|pc|cK|pg||
pc|s9|mc|6|pg||
qx|o13|st||md|3SQ7HQT74D2CQT5432,SJ64HJ6DQJ873CK86,SA8532HAK5DA5CA97,SKT9H9832DKT964CJ|sv|b|mb|1C|an| |mb|p|nt|daman: can they find 5@C? |pg||
mb|1D|an| |mb|p|mb|1N|an| |mb|p|mb|2C|an| |mb|p|mb|2S|an| |mb|p|nt|daman: 2@C followed by 3@C would show long @Cs and seconary @Hs|pg||
nt|daman: d*|pg||
mb|3C|mb|p|nt|daman: tah dah|pg||
mb|3H|mb|p|mb|4C|mb|p|mb|5C|nt|daman: 4@C now   must show 6|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|daman: a super auction|pg||
mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores: http://r.poznan2011.pl/mxt/rrleaderb.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|cQ|pc|cK|pc|cA|pg||
nt|daman: that was not the lead that hurt|pg||
pc|c7|pc|d4|nt|daman: will make 6 now|pg||
pc|cT|pc|c6|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c8|pc|c9|pc|h2|pg||
mc|12|pg||
qx|c13|st||md|3SQ7HQT74D2CQT5432,SJ64HJ6DQJ873CK86,SA8532HAK5DA5CA97,SKT9H9832DKT964CJ|sv|b|mb|1C!|nt|roswolf: this seems an easy grand to bid|pg||
mb|p|mb|1D!|mb|p|nt|roswolf: strong club in vogue here|pg||
mb|1S|nt|roswolf: despite the pre-empt perhaps not:)|pg||
nt|bobholl: 4@C explained as @D better(:)? than 4@D |pg||
nt|roswolf: can west do anything more than raise to 6?|pg||
nt|bobholl: 5@D why not ?|pg||
mb|p|nt|pelu: 5@c a nice game - not 3NT|pg||
nt|roswolf: 3nt looks favorite|pg||
mb|2C|nt|Walddk4: Welcome back|pg||
nt|Walddk4: Hello to Oliver Clarke|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: but what next?|pg||
mb|3C|nt|roswolf: east is very minimum|pg||
nt|oliverc: hi everyone|pg||
mb|p|nt|bobholl: jan will have to take the risk he daoes|pg||
nt|roswolf: no maybe @C will prevail|pg||
mb|3S|mb|p|nt|roswolf: 3nt from north will put the question to south|pg||
mb|3N|nt|roswolf: if west is there with a punt - sowhat|pg||
nt|roswolf: well good luck comes to his aid|pg||
nt|oliverc: A fairly predictable final contract|pg||
nt|oliverc: Nothing likely to disturb this|pg||
mb|p|nt|oliverc: South effectively endplayed on the opening lead|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|roswolf: my first prediction was right|pg||
nt|roswolf: still south may run the club Q|pg||
nt|pelu: why not 3@H by S and not 3@S to tell her hand?|pg||
nt|roswolf: north  i meant|pg||
nt|roswolf: fair comment peter|pg||
nt|pelu: yes but then he sh be in 6@C :)|pg||
nt|roswolf: that's true|pg||
pc|d6|pc|d2|pc|dJ|pc|dA|pg||
nt|roswolf: run the queen or play the ace?|pg||
pc|s2|nt|roswolf: but bidding a making grand after a preempt is always a good achievemnt so well done|pg||
pc|s9|pc|sQ|pc|sJ|pg||
nt|Walddk4: welcome back to Wiebe de Jong|pg||
nt|pelu: remember the 1@S hand? in OR West open 1@S - and EW in 4@H -3|pg||
nt|roswolf: i like running the queen since opps sometimes dont cover anyway|pg||
pc|s7|nt|brotherp: hello all|pg||
nt|Walddk4: and Tony Wilkinson|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: Hi again|pg||
nt|bobholl: making fun about ducking the @C twice|pg||
nt|oliverc: hi|pg||
pc|s4|nt|bobholl: good @D switch|pg||
pc|sA|pc|sT|pg||
pc|cA|pc|cJ|pc|c2|nt|roswolf: hmm north trying a psychological line|pg||
pc|c6|pg||
pc|c7|pc|h2|pc|cQ|pc|cK|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d5|pc|d9|nt|roswolf: now dead|pg||
pc|h4|pg||
mc|7|nt|pelu: 4@S also a make|pg||
nt|Walddk4: Welcome to Tobias Förster|pg||
nt|ampelman: hello Peter, hello Geoffrey|pg||
nt|ampelman: NS play Blue Club|pg||
nt|ampelman: 1@s was 17-20 with 5+@s|pg||
nt|ampelman: 1@c strong|pg||
nt|ampelman: 1@d negativ|pg||
nt|pelu: NS in 5@C in OR = 13 IMP for Coupless|pg||
nt|ampelman: 2@c showed some @c and maximum|pg||
nt|vugraphpl9: short break|pg||
pg||
qx|o14|st||md|4SAJ7654HKJ62D64CQ,SK82HAT9874DA9CK2,SQT93H3DKT83CJT53,SHQ5DQJ752CA98764|sv|o|mb|2N|nt|daman: NS should be able to compete in @Ss over the 2NT opening|pg||
nt|daman: what would we all bid?|pg||
nt|daman: my mother would double   showing BOTH majors    lol'|pg||
mb|3D|mb|p|mb|4S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|d|nt|daman: 3@D is a bit like Unusual vs Unusual     showing @Ss with secondary @Hs|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|daman: 3@D would have been longer @Hs with secondary @Ss|pg||
mb|p|nt|daman: 3@C sorry|pg||
pc|dQ|nt|daman: EW should come to 4 tricks|pg||
pc|d4|pc|dA|pc|d3|pg||
pc|c2|nt|daman: now a @C|pg||
pc|c3|pc|cA|pc|cQ|pg||
pc|c4|pc|s4|pc|cK|pc|c5|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s2|pc|s3|pc|c6|pg||
nt|daman: 4@S was aggressive after the 2NT opening with 4-4 in the minors    but   South could have a better hand also|pg||
pc|s5|nt|Walddk2: Welcome to CK|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s9|nt|psyck: Hello|pg||
nt|daman: Hi CK|pg||
pc|c7|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h3|pc|h5|pc|h2|pg||
pc|d9|pc|dK|pc|d5|pc|d6|pg||
pc|sT|pc|c8|pc|s6|pc|s8|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|c14|st||md|4SAJ7654HKJ62D64CQ,SK82HAT9874DA9CK2,SQT93H3DKT83CJT53,SHQ5DQJ752CA98764|sv|o|nt|pelu: so far so good, but|pg||
mb|p|mb|2H!|nt|roswolf: a freakish deal at last|pg||
nt|bobholl: normal 4@H now|pg||
mb|p|nt|brotherp: difficult hand coming up now|pg||
nt|ampelman: 2@h=5+@s 4+@h 8-14|pg||
mb|2S|nt|ampelman: ten major cards if 8-10|pg||
nt|roswolf: 2@H flannery?|pg||
mb|2N!|mb|3S|mb|p|nt|roswolf: this could be feisty|pg||
mb|4S|nt|brotherp: cruel @d duplication|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|d|mb|p|nt|brotherp: impossible @c lead needed it seems|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: chance of a club ruff perhaps|pg||
mb|p|nt|brotherp: even on a d-lead declarer still has a lot of work to do|pg||
nt|oliverc: perhaps hard to find the J@C lead on this bidding|pg||
nt|bobholl: has to lead small @S from hand to get rid of 2@C|pg||
nt|vugraphzhd: Standings after 8 of 11 rounds: 1: Drijver-Brink +56,7 2nd Jansma-Paulissen 20,4 3rd Schollaardt wortel +18,1 4th Westra-Bertens +12,5 5th Bakkeren-Bakkeren +4,1|pg||
mb|p|nt|ampelman: south shape is difficult to bid otherwise since canape is in use|pg||
nt|roswolf: i like the double|pg||
nt|ampelman: after the 1Major opening|pg||
nt|roswolf: looks like a trick in every suit|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d4|pc|dA|nt|bobholl: the last one was freakish too ?)|pg||
nt|roswolf: 6/6's are always freaks|pg||
pc|d3|pg||
pc|d9|pc|dK|nt|brotherp: good start|pg||
nt|brotherp: now it's sort of a guess between @cA onside or @sK onside|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: looks as though there might be and endplay|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d6|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h5|nt|roswolf: now defence needs to cash|pg||
pc|hK|pc|hA|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c3|nt|bobholl: good duck by maarten|pg||
pc|cA|pc|cQ|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|sJ|nt|bobholl: he'll make 4 now i guess|pg||
nt|roswolf: yup|pg||
pc|h4|pc|d8|pg||
nt|brotherp: wrong guess|pg||
nt|ampelman: there is the danger of a second undetrick|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s2|pc|s3|pc|c4|pg||
pc|s4|nt|bobholl: sry 5|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s9|pc|c6|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: we can see all the hands of course and declarer makes some natural plays|pg||
pc|s8|pc|sT|pc|d5|pc|s5|pg||
pc|dT|pc|d7|pc|h2|pc|h7|pg||
mc|8|nt|roswolf: which materialised|pg||
nt|ampelman: I think it was -1 now, right ?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl9: was 2 down|pg||
nt|ampelman: ok|pg||
pg||
qx|o15|st||md|1SQTHAQDKJ853CAQ32,SK872HKJ9753D92CT,SA543H86DQT76C975,SJ96HT42DA4CKJ864|sv|n|mb|1D|nt|psyck: looks like 3N by S here|pg||
mb|2H|an| |nt|psyck: if they can get there|pg||
mb|p|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://r.poznan2011.pl/mxt/rrleaderb.html|pg||
mb|3H|an| |nt|daman: 3NT now?|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|daman: taking a shot?|pg||
nt|psyck: someone qwill double|pg||
nt|daman: North|pg||
mb|4D|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|cT|nt|daman: this should but Boeddeker on the bopard|pg||
nt|psyck: that is quite a view to bid 4@d there, losing chances of either penalty or @s or NT contracts|pg||
nt|daman: board*|pg||
pc|c5|pc|c6|pc|cQ|pg||
pc|d3|pc|d2|pc|dQ|pc|dA|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|cA|pc|d9|pc|c7|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h6|pc|hT|pc|hQ|pg||
pc|dK|pc|h5|nt|psyck: even that  endplay does not help declarer after the good start by defense|pg||
pc|d6|pc|d4|pg||
nt|daman: not playing a @C system allowed EW to crowd the auction and create this good result|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|sK|pc|sA|pc|s6|pg||
pc|h8|pc|h2|pc|hA|pc|h7|pg||
pc|sT|pc|s2|pc|s3|nt|daman: in the CR     North made a negative double of 2@H|pg||
pc|sJ|pg||
pc|cK|pc|c2|pc|s7|pc|c9|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|c15|st||md|1SQTHAQDKJ853CAQ32,SK872HKJ9753D92CT,SA543H86DQT76C975,SJ96HT42DA4CKJ864|sv|n|nt|Walddk4: At long last|pg||
nt|Walddk4: Welcome everyone|pg||
nt|Walddk4: and welcome to Peter Lund|pg||
nt|pelu: hi all with some delay|pg||
mb|1C|mb|2H|mb|d|nt|brotherp: another interesting hand coming up|pg||
mb|3H|mb|3N|mb|4H|nt|bobholl: results on http://www.nbbportal.nl/27000/districtscompetitie_2.html|pg||
nt|Walddk4: Welcome to another Peter, Goodman from Wales|pg||
nt|pelu: Its Tyrkey against a real international team with players from USA, Germany, Sweden and Netherland|pg||
nt|petepunt: morning all|pg||
nt|ampelman: 1@c=16+ any|pg||
mb|d|nt|brotherp: seems like 4@h made needs some defensive cooperation|pg||
nt|brotherp: which they got in the open room|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: the 4 hearts played elsewhere does not look that attractive|pg||
mb|p|nt|oliverc: no|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: rehi|pg||
nt|roswolf: this looks a decent slam|pg||
nt|bobholl: For results: http://tinyurl.com/44xdakb   this one shorter?|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: 5 diamonds seems ok|pg||
nt|brotherp: 5@d really in the picture now|pg||
mb|p|nt|pelu: a big swing in B3: in OR Fredin-Michielsen stopped in 4@H with 13 tricks from top in 7NT - the problem: a 2@C opening - also calles the "slam-killer" :)|pg||
nt|ampelman: X=points|pg||
pc|h6|nt|brotherp: well a @c lead would sink 5@d ...and North might have started with @c Ace |pg||
nt|roswolf: e/w seem to have bid recklessly here|pg||
pc|h2|nt|wilkinsona: yes, as spec says ...|pg||
nt|bobholl: 5 @D was the contract to be in but paulissens pass is understandable|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: and another spec points out the attractions of 3N|pg||
nt|bobholl: 5@D goes down also on 3@C |pg||
nt|brotherp: in the end the 4@H contract in the open room was made because North continued spades when in with the @hA|pg||
nt|bobholl: @C disappearing on @D|pg||
nt|brotherp: with South holding 3@d's that was just enough|pg||
nt|petepunt: tough 3rd bid for North,  but 2@H looks better|pg||
nt|Walddk4: Operator, East's name is spelt  Kuzselka|pg||
nt|pelu: there are 12 tricks - but only with @hs 3-3|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h3|pg||
nt|roswolf: 6nt likely|pg||
nt|petepunt: 4NT feels the right spot though|pg||
pc|sQ|nt|roswolf: can be made on a minor suit squeeze i think|pg||
nt|roswolf: 5nt pick a slam probably|pg||
nt|bobholl: 6@D easier|pg||
nt|roswolf: might bid a grand i suppose|pg||
pc|sK|pc|sA|pc|s6|pg||
pc|s3|nt|roswolf: 7@D CAN be made by the backward finesse in trumps which pins the 10 +9|pg||
nt|roswolf: hardly likely though unless south shows his hand|pg||
nt|roswolf: this may be a long think|pg||
nt|bobholl: it is and understandable :)|pg||
nt|bobholl: s said he'll ask what he shows afterwards :)|pg||
pc|s9|nt|ampelman: 3NT seems to have 8 tricks on the first look|pg||
pc|sT|pc|s2|pg||
pc|d5|nt|roswolf: this will take some time to play|pg||
pc|d9|nt|bobholl: can be made after giving up 1@H and than a @D @C squeeze on n|pg||
pc|dT|nt|oliverc: I have to go. Thanks everyone|pg||
pc|dA|pg||
pc|hT|pc|hQ|nt|petepunt: usefull to play 4n as quant after going through 4th suit as many othet forcing bids avail|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h8|pg||
nt|roswolf: i am sure declarer will ultimately play for the squeeze|pg||
nt|ampelman: @h or @s lead gives the ninth|pg||
pc|hJ|pc|d7|pc|h4|nt|roswolf: looks -2|pg||
pc|d3|pg||
pc|cT|pc|c5|pc|cK|pc|cA|pg||
pc|dK|pc|d2|pc|d6|pc|d4|pg||
mc|8|pg||
qx|o16|st||md|2ST7HQ82DAT963CK98,SA2HAT7DQJ42CQJT6,SQ6HK9653DKCA5432,SKJ98543HJ4D875C7|sv|e|nt|daman: 9 well earned IMPs|pg||
mb|1N|an| |mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|nt|psyck: good stop other table, would expect more bidding here|pg||
mb|p|mb|2N|an| |mb|3S|nt|psyck: ok, that should end it here too|pg||
mb|4D|nt|daman: South may interpret 2NT wrong|pg||
mb|d|nt|daman: as he did|pg||
mb|4H|mb|p|nt|psyck: S probably got it right & bid 4@d as pass or correct|pg||
nt|psyck: as he has tolerance for rounded suits too|pg||
mb|p|mb|d|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|daman: he could have passed 3@S|pg||
pc|c7|nt|psyck: sure, that was what i expected, but if she was going to bid, 4@d it right|pg||
nt|daman: as long as EW do not touch trumps this will fail|pg||
pc|c8|pc|cT|pc|cA|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://r.poznan2011.pl/mxt/rrleaderb.html|pg||
nt|psyck: I see some tables got as high as 5@hx this deal :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: www.poznan2011.pl :)|pg||
pc|h3|pc|h4|pc|hQ|pc|hA|pg||
pc|h7|pc|hK|pc|hJ|pc|h2|pg||
pc|dK|pc|d7|pc|d3|pc|d2|pg||
pc|c4|pc|s5|pc|cK|pc|c6|pg||
pc|dA|pc|d4|pc|s6|pc|d5|pg||
pc|c9|pc|cJ|pc|c2|pc|s3|pg||
pc|cQ|pc|c3|pc|d8|pc|h8|pg||
mc|8|pg||
qx|c16|st||md|2ST7HQ82DAT963CK98,SA2HAT7DQJ42CQJT6,SQ6HK9653DKCA5432,SKJ98543HJ4D875C7|sv|e|nt|wilkinsona: thanks|pg||
nt|roswolf: how high will east go?|pg||
mb|1N|nt|roswolf: another slam this time for n/s|pg||
nt|ampelman: 4@s ?|pg||
mb|2H!|nt|ampelman: how strong is 1NT ?|pg||
nt|roswolf: not strong enough i fear|pg||
mb|2S|nt|roswolf: 2@S looks wet|pg||
mb|3H|mb|p|nt|petepunt: west will prob be forced up to 4@C here too|pg||
nt|Walddk4: http://www.eurobridge.org/competitions/11Poznan/Bulletins/bul01.pdf  for today's bulletin. I recommend pages 4 through 7 :)|pg||
nt|pelu: if 1Nt = 12-14 then 2@S is the normal bid|pg||
nt|ampelman: 2@H=should be 5+@H + 4+minor|pg||
mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|mb|p|nt|brotherp: easy 3NT...13 tricks seems like a lot though|pg||
mb|p|pc|hQ|nt|Walddk4: running scores at  http://r.poznan2011.pl/mxt/rrleaderb.html|pg||
nt|ampelman: should make|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h6|nt|ampelman: losing 1@h 1@c 2@d|pg||
pc|h4|pg||
nt|petepunt: East suspects the 4-3 fit :)|pg||
pc|sA|nt|roswolf: hmm n/s didnt even try for the slam bonus|pg||
nt|ewj: I|pg||
nt|petepunt: lot to do here.|pg||
pc|s6|nt|bobholl: in this bidding the critical singleton @C is not shown|pg||
pc|s3|pc|sT|pg||
pc|s2|pc|sQ|pc|sK|nt|bobholl: he claims with beer card as the last one @D7|pg||
nt|vugraphzhd: Small break now|pg||
nt|vugraphzhd: Standings after 10 of 22 rounds: 1st: Drijver Brink +72 2nd Schollaardt-wortel +42 3rd Jansma-Paulissen +27 4th Cornellisse Krijgsman +23|pg||
pc|s7|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes poor judgment not to show it|pg||
pc|hJ|nt|petepunt: He needs to play N for the AJ@S for many reasons|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h7|pc|hK|pg||
pc|dK|pc|d5|pc|dT|nt|petepunt: SHe has started very well here :)|pg||
pc|d2|pg||
mc|9|nt|pelu: now W can claim|pg||
nt|pelu: E :)|pg||
nt|vugraphpl9: and she did|pg||
pg||
qx|o17|st||md|3SJ97HKQJ72DJTCQ98,SHA98654DQ9872CJT,SQ432HTDA653CA632,SAKT865H3DK4CK754|sv|o|nt|daman: these players came to bid|pg||
mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|2H|mb|p|mb|2S|mb|p|mb|3D|mb|p|nt|daman: EW play a system where 2@C over an opening is a GF|pg||
nt|daman: all other bids seem to be NF|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|psyck: ok, that explains this sequence|pg||
pc|d3|nt|daman: refer to board 11 CK|pg||
pc|d4|pc|dT|pc|dQ|pg||
pc|hA|pc|hT|pc|h3|nt|psyck: missing in my movie :(|pg||
nt|daman: the @D spots are helpful|pg||
pc|h2|pg||
nt|psyck: this table did not violate Burn Law like the other table, but they may be too high anyway |pg||
pc|h4|pc|c2|pc|dK|pc|h7|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s7|pc|h5|pc|s2|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s9|pc|h6|pc|s3|pg||
pc|s5|pc|sJ|pc|d2|pc|s4|pg||
pc|cJ|pc|c3|pc|cK|pc|c9|pg||
pc|s6|pc|dJ|pc|h8|pc|sQ|pg||
pc|hJ|pc|h9|nt|daman: this contract is running out of steam|pg||
pc|c6|pc|c4|pg||
pc|hK|nt|daman: but will make|pg||
pc|d7|nt|psyck: S ruffing last @s did not help|pg||
pc|dA|pc|c5|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c7|pc|c8|pc|cT|pg||
nt|daman: a breathless push|pg||
mc|9|pg||
qx|c17|st||md|3SJ97HKQJ72DJTCQ98,SHA98654DQ9872CJT,SQ432HTDA653CA632,SAKT865H3DK4CK754|sv|o|nt|ampelman: where will this end ?|pg||
mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|1N!|nt|roswolf: a hand where you dont want to be declarer|pg||
mb|p|mb|2C!|mb|p|nt|pelu: look at the @S-suit - against 4@h S lead @SK - and N took @SA to play @H = only 3 @S-losers for E|pg||
nt|pelu: 2@D or 2@C by West - I prefer 2@c|pg||
mb|2H|nt|brotherp: ns are playing some kind of strong club|pg||
mb|p|mb|2S|nt|roswolf: this is a horror hand for e/w to bid|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|nt|pelu: in OR 2@C and then 2@S = 4. suit - so the NS didnt know the @S-suit by decl|pg||
nt|roswolf: you should as west be able to bid 3@D nf here|pg||
pc|dJ|nt|bobholl: he showed 5@H 4@D and a minimum|pg||
nt|pelu: 2@S is winning place|pg||
nt|ampelman: losing 2@s 2@c 1@d ?|pg||
nt|pelu: 4 black losers|pg||
pc|d2|nt|bobholl: tricky play |pg||
nt|bobholl: with 52 cards open not difficult but |pg||
nt|brotherp: best lead|pg||
nt|bobholl: jansma does that (too) often :)|pg||
nt|petepunt: may even lead @H here|pg||
nt|roswolf: yes that is as maybe but a 6-0 fit is usually to be avoided|pg||
pc|dA|nt|wilkinsona: plenty of chances though|pg||
nt|petepunt: @C suit is interesting here|pg||
pc|d4|pg||
pc|c2|nt|brotherp: think Verhees will play West for the @dJ...keeping the dangerous hand of lead|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: looks logical|pg||
nt|bobholl: but how to cross ? open up the @H for defenders ?|pg||
pc|c4|pc|cQ|pc|cT|pg||
nt|roswolf: hmm not an expected switch|pg||
pc|c9|pc|cJ|pc|cA|pc|c5|pg||
pc|d6|nt|roswolf: yes he needs to st up the side suit|pg||
nt|brotherp: easy hand now|pg||
pc|dK|nt|petepunt: will need to use a little deception to make this one|pg||
pc|dT|pc|d7|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s7|nt|brotherp: only some ego-points to be won by divining the black suit distribution now|pg||
pc|h4|pc|s2|pg||
nt|roswolf: this is now straightforward|pg||
pc|sK|pc|s9|pc|h5|pc|s3|pg||
pc|s8|pc|sJ|nt|brotherp: going for beauty and a throw in or simply playing for the @sK onside|pg||
nt|brotherp: the latter|pg||
pc|h6|pc|s4|pg||
mc|9|nt|ampelman: +1 ?|pg||
nt|pelu: ? =|pg||
nt|vugraphpl9: just made, sry |pg||
pg||
qx|o18|st||md|4SAJ874HA9D543CT72,S65HQT432DA7CAK53,SQT932HJ876DJCJ96,SKHK5DKQT9862CQ84|sv|n|nt|psyck: the defenders allowed 3@d to make as Burns law violations should not be allowed to gain|pg||
nt|daman: 5@D is a great contract|pg||
mb|1D|an| |mb|p|mb|2C|an| |nt|daman: there's that 2@C GF|pg||
mb|p|mb|2S|an| |mb|d|nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://r.poznan2011.pl/mxt/rrleaderb.html|pg||
mb|3H|mb|3S|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|sT|nt|Walddk2: Running scores at  http://b.poznan2011.pl/mxt/rrrunda2.html|pg||
pc|sK|pc|sA|nt|psyck: that artificial bidding allowed NS to get in making it worse for EW to find proper spot|pg||
pc|s6|pg||
pc|h9|pc|h2|pc|h6|pc|hK|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c7|pc|cK|pc|c6|pg||
nt|psyck: if you don't cash it, you dont get it|pg||
pc|s5|pc|s9|pc|h5|pc|s4|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d3|pc|dA|pc|dJ|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h7|pc|d6|pc|hA|pg||
nt|psyck: trump was good idea, but strange not to play A & another|pg||
pc|sJ|pc|h3|pc|s2|pc|d8|pg||
nt|daman: there has to be a way to get to 5@D|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c9|pc|c8|pc|c2|pg||
nt|psyck: difficult once NS come in with @s|pg||
nt|psyck: both rooms had the same problem|pg||
pc|d7|pc|h8|pc|d9|pc|d4|pg||
pc|sQ|pc|dT|pc|s7|pc|h4|pg||
pc|c3|pc|cJ|pc|cQ|pc|cT|pg||
pc|dQ|pc|d5|mc|9|nt|psyck: I guess they play negative free bids other room, so W had to x 1st, & E felt 4@d on 3@s would show better hand|pg||
pg||
qx|c18|st||md|4SAJ874HA9D543CT72,S65HQT432DA7CAK53,SQT932HJ876DJCJ96,SKHK5DKQT9862CQ84|sv|n|nt|bobholl: standing after R 9 brink drijv 44 wortel scholl 18 jansma paul 15 so we see a meeting between 2 and 3|pg||
nt|pelu: np Kacper - u just would see if we wre awake :)|pg||
mb|1D|nt|vugraphpl9: :)|pg||
mb|1S|mb|d|nt|ampelman: in 16 other room plays 4@hX|pg||
nt|ampelman: where east bid here 2@s and 3@s|pg||
nt|ampelman: which ended the auction|pg||
mb|3S|mb|p|nt|bobholl: in pairs it was rigth to play @D in imp @C seems rigth|pg||
mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|nt|roswolf: 4@H incroyable|pg||
nt|roswolf: and where is the axe?|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: east's opening is ugly|pg||
nt|roswolf: west will likely lead a spade|pg||
nt|ampelman: 4@h looks optimistic to me|pg||
mb|p|nt|brotherp: no light openers for Jansma (agreed it is a disgusting collection)|pg||
pc|sT|nt|petepunt: tough to deafeat this|pg||
nt|roswolf: too bold|pg||
nt|roswolf: it looks like a mixed teams bid|pg||
pc|sK|pc|sA|nt|bobholl: 3nt a good save against 4@S funny :)|pg||
nt|roswolf: yup bridge is a strange but wondrous game|pg||
nt|bobholl: on a @H lead anyway :)|pg||
pc|s5|pg||
nt|ampelman: 5@d looks fine|pg||
nt|pelu: for sure no X - %@D making easy|pg||
nt|pelu: 5@d|pg||
pc|c2|pc|cA|nt|bobholl: nice balance from gert jan (paulissen)|pg||
nt|brotherp: still Paulissen is there so EW reach their part-score in clubs|pg||
pc|c6|pc|c4|pg||
nt|bobholl: but i saw 2nt as balance (may be wrong)|pg||
pc|s6|pc|s2|pc|h5|pc|s4|pg||
pc|hK|pc|hA|pc|h2|pc|h6|pg||
pc|c7|pc|c3|pc|c9|nt|brotherp: Jansma doesnt know trumps are 2-2 so looking for the best way to play diamonds|pg||
pc|cQ|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d3|pc|dA|pc|dJ|pg||
pc|hQ|pc|h7|pc|d6|pc|h9|pg||
pc|h3|mc|9|nt|pelu: so "only" down 1|pg||
pg||
qx|o19|st||md|1S7HKT754DAT76CJ74,SKQT642HJ63DK53CK,SAJHQ8DQJ842CQT93,S9853HA92D9CA8652|sv|e|mb|p|mb|1S|mb|p|mb|2N|mb|p|mb|3C|an| |mb|p|mb|3D|an| |nt|psyck: as much weaker hand for 2N than we are used to seeing|pg||
mb|p|mb|3S|mb|p|mb|p|mb|p|pc|cT|nt|psyck: @h lead may have restricted?|pg||
pc|c2|pc|c7|pc|cK|pg||
pc|sQ|nt|psyck: as cards are, no way to beat 4@s|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s3|pc|s7|pg||
nt|psyck: i was right 1st time, @hq lead resticts|pg||
mc|10|pg||
qx|c19|st||md|1S7HKT754DAT76CJ74,SKQT642HJ63DK53CK,SAJHQ8DQJ842CQT93,S9853HA92D9CA8652|sv|e|nt|bobholl: if e had ducked the 1st @C would have been much more difficult|pg||
nt|petepunt: this has been a good come back by fredins team here|pg||
nt|pelu: a biddinbg misunderstand - and unlucky lead chanced 650 to 1090|pg||
nt|roswolf: hmm not sure east would take out if west stood it - a golden rule seems to be to leave such decisions to the better player(ahem ie the man):)|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: this is a bits and pieces hand|pg||
mb|1S|mb|p|nt|roswolf: this is a Mixed Competition and it has its own dynamics|pg||
nt|pelu: remember Board 17, where u would like W to bid 3@D NF - W in OR could that and are npw playing a hopeless 3@D|pg||
mb|2N!|mb|p|nt|brotherp: precision 1@d|pg||
nt|roswolf: well a direct raise to game isnt stupid|pg||
mb|3H|mb|p|nt|brotherp: asking 2@c|pg||
mb|4S|nt|bobholl: spades a bit unpretty|pg||
nt|pelu: the key-pælay in 4@s in OR was in trick 3 - after 2x@S N played @h7 - and @HK from East - all over|pg||
mb|p|mb|p|nt|wilkinsona: the rebidable singleton..|pg||
mb|p|pc|dQ|nt|pelu: wrong Q by N :)|pg||
nt|roswolf: this should be ok|pg||
pc|d9|nt|brotherp: not so easy to lead @d's now|pg||
nt|wilkinsona: now west was -2 elsewhere, how can East do?|pg||
nt|bobholl: e has shown 4414 or 4405 so easy :)|pg||
nt|brotherp: and another lead seems to let the contract through|pg||
nt|pelu: @hQ will defeat 4@s|pg||
pc|dA|nt|wilkinsona: ..and this seems to...|pg||
nt|brotherp: still West passes 3NT knowing the shortness; so club lead looks attractive|pg||
nt|pelu: for me 4@D is not bridge red against green and opp stop in 3@s|pg||
pc|d3|pg||
nt|pelu: sorry he made 3@D :(|pg||
pc|s7|nt|ampelman: after the 3@h bid the @hQ lead is too tough to find|pg||
pc|sK|nt|bobholl: 4@H 2@C 3@S may be |pg||
nt|brotherp: small spade or small club both seem attractive|pg||
pc|sA|pc|s3|pg||
pc|c3|nt|pelu: what is 3@H?|pg||
mc|10|nt|vugraphpl9: nobody alerted|pg||
nt|ampelman: no alert so natural ?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl9: iI think so|pg||
nt|roswolf: semi-bluff|pg||
nt|ampelman: lead-prohibator :)|pg||
pg||
qx|o20|st||md|2SKQJ843H98764DCJ8,SAT72HQDKJT4CQ974,S96HAKJT3D632CT63,S5H52DAQ9875CAK52|sv|b|mb|1D|an| |mb|1H|mb|d|mb|4H|mb|p|mb|p|mb|5D|mb|p|mb|p|nt|psyck: other room N did not overcall 1@h & EW had a free ride to explore slowly|pg||
mb|p|pc|hA|nt|vugraphpl2: www.poznan2011.pl|pg||
pc|h2|pc|h9|pc|hQ|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/mxt/rrleaderb.html|pg||
pc|d2|pc|d5|pc|s3|pc|dK|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|d3|pc|d7|pc|s4|pg||
pc|d4|pc|d6|pc|dQ|pc|h4|pg||
pc|cA|pc|c8|pc|c4|pc|c3|pg||
pc|cK|pc|cJ|pc|c7|pc|c6|pg||
nt|psyck: I'd have preferred E to set the suit 1st bid (say by 2@h cue as Limit raise+ for @d) rather than doubling to show values.|pg||
nt|daman: I agree|pg||
nt|psyck: then they may still have been able to find out major suit controls even after the barrage to consider slam|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: claim and intervention of tournament director...|pg||
mc|12|nt|daman: now board 11?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: because W explained the bid double for spades and S didn't bid 5S... |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: no, pairs play without board 11|pg||
nt|psyck: and W didn't bid 5@s?|pg||
nt|psyck: :)|pg||
nt|psyck: thanks all|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: both pairs are speaking with TD now...|pg||
nt|daman: so    are we through?|pg||
nt|psyck: yes, just waiting for ruling|pg||
nt|daman: thx    |pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: http://www.poznan2011.pl/|pg||
nt|daman: tahnks everyone   see you again|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: http://www.poznan2011.pl/schedule|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: running scores http://b.poznan2011.pl/mxt/rrleaderb.html|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: thank you for your attention|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: :)|pg||
nt|psyck: next round in about 70 mins|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: we should begin the next round at 3PM|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: see you soon :)|pg||
nt|psyck: TD may uphold result & NS will not mind once they see the scoresheet|pg||
nt|vugraphpl2: they played board 11 on the other table... they didn't know that they should play on the bbo table|pg||
pg||
qx|c20|st||md|2SKQJ843H98764DCJ8,SAT72HQDKJT4CQ974,S96HAKJT3D632CT63,S5H52DAQ9875CAK52|sv|b|nt|bobholl: a major bid would be fine|pg||
nt|roswolf: this could be bloody if someone gets too frisky|pg||
nt|petepunt: however would have bid 2@D first time|pg||
mb|1D|nt|roswolf: nice slam here|pg||
mb|p|nt|pelu: agree, Peter, 4@D now is a gamble - almost like all-in|pg||
nt|pelu: after 1@S - 2NT = invit with 4+@s for sure 3@H cant be naturel|pg||
nt|ampelman: 9 tricks for NS in a @h contract|pg||
nt|roswolf: inverted raise to start with?|pg||
nt|ampelman: splinter bid ?|pg||
mb|2D!|an|10+|nt|petepunt: prefer to be able to bid 1n with wests cards|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: strong cub|pg||
nt|Walddk4: Bid it?|pg||
mb|3D|nt|bobholl: jan (jansma) asks why east thougth so long :)|pg||
nt|roswolf: south should raise the ante|pg||
mb|p|nt|Walddk4: Running scores at  http://b.poznan2011.pl/mxt/rrrunda2.html|pg||
nt|roswolf: 4@C cue?|pg||
mb|3S!|nt|roswolf: north gets that sinking feeling|pg||
mb|p|nt|dburn: West found partner with what West could expect - a bog-standard weak no trump with two low spades|pg||
nt|Walddk4: It's not a great 11 count with KQ doubleton|pg||
mb|3N|nt|petepunt: its a shocking 11 count :)|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: ok spade cue|pg||
nt|ampelman: 3@d is minimum, I guess|pg||
nt|roswolf: 4@C or 4@D?|pg||
mb|4D|mb|p|mb|4H|mb|p|nt|brotherp: finally an easy hand|pg||
mb|4N|mb|p|mb|5H|nt|roswolf: blood will flow|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: NOW 4NT|pg||
mb|6D|nt|bobholl: they play polish @C so N knows S is strong |pg||
nt|bobholl: jan is thinking long not normal for him|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: 6@D by default|pg||
mb|p|nt|bobholl: not that easy he still has got a lot of losing @D|pg||
nt|brotherp: not knowing the friendly distribution though Schollaard will spend some time figuring out the savest way|pg||
mb|p|nt|roswolf: well done|pg||
nt|ampelman: 4@h was the bid east wanted to here|pg||
nt|ampelman: hear|pg||
nt|roswolf: indeed|pg||
pc|hA|pc|h2|pc|h4|nt|dburn: so far, so bad|pg||
pc|hQ|pg||
nt|roswolf: easy claim|pg||
pc|hK|pc|h5|nt|roswolf: this looks only -1|pg||
pc|h6|nt|brotherp: setting up clubs sure is|pg||
pc|d4|pg||
pc|dJ|pc|d2|pc|dA|pc|sK|pg||
pc|d8|pc|s3|nt|petepunt: in 1N he would have set up a @C|pg||
pc|dT|pc|d3|pg||
pc|dK|pc|d6|pc|d5|pc|h8|pg||
nt|roswolf: east seems to have created a lot of losers now|pg||
nt|bobholl: gert jan looking whether it can be more than 1 down|pg||
nt|roswolf: but just an illusion|pg||
pc|c4|pc|c6|pc|cA|pc|c8|pg||
pc|cK|pc|cJ|pc|c7|pc|c3|pg||
nt|pelu: cant claim @Cs 4-1?|pg||
mc|12|nt|pelu: now he can|pg||
nt|vugraphpl9: 10min break|pg||
nt|roswolf: last board restart scheduledin 90 mins time|pg||
nt|roswolf: really no lunch!?|pg||
nt|vugraphpl9: after 3rd round i think|pg||
pg||
